Blog

This is the category for all the blog posts of ElevatIQ.

Top 10 Practices for Pricing and Discounting in ERP

There are a lot of different ways of implementing pricing and discounting in ERP. But there’s always a debate in terms of which is the right system to implement. When we look at pricing, there are always going to be layers and layers of pricing rules. When we look across the industry, some people implement static pricing, which refers to setting prices periodically. It is often based on cost movements. 

Secondly, there’s dynamic pricing, which means that prices can change frequently, sometimes even daily. It is to maximize profit or competitiveness like in e-commerce businesses. Lastly, there’s commodity-based pricing, which industries use where the cost of materials or goods fluctuates. Most of the time, the pricing is based on standard costs, which are generally planned costs that can be updated at periodic intervals. 

This ignites the debate on where pricing should be managed—within the ERP system or externally. Businesses that lack control and consistency in their pricing strategies often face challenges such as maintaining complex distribution channels, tracking discounts and promotions, and handling overtime maintenance. These challenges call for centralized control over pricing offered by an ERP system. 

Top 10 Practices for Pricing and Discounting in ERP

Using an ERP system also eliminates the need for manual pricing decisions. It automates pricing calculations based on predefined rules, reducing errors and saving time. Many industries still resist adopting pricing and discounting processes, despite the advantages that ERP brings to the table. In this blog, we will discuss the top 10 best practices for ERP pricing and discounting processes that will help overcome this resistance. 



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

1. Pricing Simplification

When dealing with resistance from team members or departments, it’s crucial to ask fundamental questions about the complexity of the existing pricing model. The first question is whether the complexity is truly necessary or if it has evolved without clear justification. Complex pricing models can lead to numerous challenges, such as incorrect order bookings, increased potential for human errors, and data entry discrepancies. Misaligned data between the teams responsible for pricing and those responsible for order entry can have significant consequences. It can also impact margins, financial reporting, and overall revenue accuracy.

Simplifying the pricing model leads to a more streamlined and manageable pricing structure, which not only reduces the chances of errors but also enhances overall efficiency. One way to achieve simplification is by categorizing customers, products, or pricing levels and starting with a broader, more straightforward structure. Then, refinements and adjustments can be made as needed.

2. Prevent Human Errors

When different teams are responsible for pricing and discounting data entry, it increases the risk of mistakes and inconsistencies in the pricing process. These errors can have far-reaching consequences, including incorrect pricing, impacting the organization’s profitability and customer satisfaction. Managing pricing and discounting within the ERP system significantly reduces the likelihood of such errors and discrepancies.

Human errors, such as typographical mistakes, miscalculations, or misinterpretations of pricing rules, can result in incorrect pricing on sales orders or invoices. These discrepancies not only impact the immediate transaction but can have a cascading effect, affecting the company’s financial statements and reporting. Maintaining pricing and discounting within the ERP system can mitigate these risks by providing a centralized platform where pricing data can be controlled, validated, and consistently applied. Additionally, automation and validation rules can help catch and prevent errors, ensuring that pricing remains accurate.

3. Tackle Data Entry Challenges

Managing pricing and discounting outside the ERP system presents significant challenges in terms of data entry accuracy and consistency. It’s often difficult to convince organizations to maintain pricing and discounting within the ERP system, and this reluctance can lead to various implications, especially when different teams are involved in the process.  Discrepancies may emerge due to the lack of a centralized control mechanism. Various teams may have their interpretations and ways of entering pricing data, leading to inconsistencies and errors.

These discrepancies can not only affect day-to-day operations but can also have broader implications, impacting an organization’s financial statements, profitability, and customer satisfaction. The risk of data entry errors looms large, as any disconnect between those responsible for setting pricing and those managing data entry leaves room for mistakes, leading to many issues. Ultimately, the integrity and accuracy of data become challenging to maintain. 

4. Maintain Consistency in Financial Data

When pricing and discounting are managed outside the ERP system, several challenges occur. Incorrect pricing, whether due to complexity or siloed departments, can have a far-reaching impact on a business. Even minor pricing errors can accumulate over time, resulting in inaccuracies in financial statements. A pricing structure that is too complex or fragmented can lead to errors in booking orders, creating discrepancies that accumulate over time.

These discrepancies ultimately affect an organization’s profit margins, financial reporting, and the general ledger. Maintaining pricing within the ERP system is the solution to mitigate these challenges. By doing so, organizations can ensure that their financial data remains consistent and accurate. This approach reduces the chances of human errors and ensures that data integrity is maintained throughout the organization.

5. Encourage a Step Back

Reconsider your pricing strategy and its complexity. Also, discuss the benefits of broad pricing rules that can later be refined. Embracing an ERP system for pricing can be challenging, but it’s essential to understand the implications of your pricing strategy and the advantages of a more flexible approach. By asking questions like, “Does it need to be this complex?” and “Why is it so complicated?” organizations can prompt a critical evaluation of their pricing practices. This questioning can lead to a realization that simplification is possible and can result in more straightforward, manageable pricing structures.

6. Automation and Integration

One compelling argument for maintaining pricing and discounting within the ERP is the automation and integration benefits it offers. When pricing rules are established within the ERP system, it can automatically compute prices based on various parameters such as customer, product, quantity, and more. This high level of automation saves both time and effort while also significantly reducing the risk of manual errors. ERP systems are also well-suited for seamless integration with other business processes, guaranteeing the consistent and accurate dissemination of pricing data throughout the organization. This means that prices are calculated consistently, from sales orders to invoices and across various touchpoints within the organization, ensuring that everyone works with the same pricing data. 

7. Integration Requirements

When businesses opt for pricing and discounting outside of their ERP systems, it often necessitates developing complex data flows and integrations to ensure that pricing data is transferred accurately between various systems and departments. This is because pricing is closely tied to other processes, such as order booking and financial reporting, and ensuring consistency and accuracy in data flows becomes crucial. Without proper integration, data discrepancies can arise, leading to errors in pricing and resulting in financial and operational complications.

Furthermore, maintaining data accuracy for pricing is essential, irrespective of whether pricing and discounting is managed within or outside the ERP. Accurate pricing data is the foundation of fair transactions and profit margins. Inaccuracies can lead to errors in customer orders and invoicing, which can erode customer trust and impact financial performance. By emphasizing the need for data accuracy, it becomes evident that pricing data integrity is vital, and this can best be achieved by keeping pricing within the ERP system. 

8. ERP User Interface Simplification

Customizing the user interface of an ERP system can be a powerful solution for making it more accessible to marketers. By customizing the user interface, it is possible to streamline and simplify the user experience. It makes it more user-friendly. This customization can involve creating simplified screens, reducing the number of fields, and focusing on the essential information required for pricing decisions. By doing so, marketers and other users can interact with the ERP system more comfortably. The ERP interface can be tailored to their specific needs and preferences.

9. Encourage Collaboration

To address the reluctance of some departments and promote collaboration, organizations should encourage a cross-functional approach to pricing. This emphasizes shared responsibility for data accuracy. In this context, it’s vital to establish common ground and understanding of the pricing process across departments. Instead of viewing pricing management as the sole responsibility of one department, organizations should highlight that pricing impacts multiple aspects of the business. This may including sales, finance, and marketing. 

By fostering collaboration, various teams can contribute their expertise and insights to create more effective and well-rounded pricing strategies. Additionally, collaboration helps streamline the flow of information and communication. When multiple departments collaborate, it becomes easier to maintain data accuracy and ensure pricing decisions are based on up-to-date and consistent information. 

10. Workflow and Approval Improvements

In the context of streamlining pricing and discounting changes, improving workflow and approval processes within the ERP is critical. Addressing resistance by educating stakeholders on the ERP’s architecture, data flows, and integration challenges, making it clear that maintaining pricing in the ERP is not as daunting as it may seem is important. By improving workflow and approval processes, organizations can create efficient systems for managing pricing changes. This can significantly reduce the complexities associated with pricing management while ensuring data accuracy and streamlined processes within the ERP.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the blog dives into the details of best practices for pricing and discounting in ERP. Mainly highlighting the ongoing debate regarding where these critical processes should be managed – within an ERP system or externally. It emphasizes that pricing complexity often leads to multiple layers of rules. The blog discusses three primary pricing approaches: static pricing, dynamic pricing, and commodity-based pricing. While acknowledging the diversity of preferences, it emphasizes the importance of centralizing control over pricing within an ERP system.

The blog also talks about simplifying pricing models, preventing human errors and discrepancies, and tackling data entry challenges. All of which can adversely impact profit margins and financial reporting when pricing is managed externally. It further encourages a step back to rethink pricing strategies and adopt broader rules that can later be refined. Automation, integration, and improving the ERP user interface are identified as crucial aspects that can help businesses create a compelling case for pricing within the ERP system. The blog also highlights the importance of encouraging department collaboration and making workflow and approval processes more efficient. It also outlines a set of best practices to overcome resistance and successfully manage pricing and discounting processes within an ERP system. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Top 10 ERP Contract Terms

Requiring substantial expertise to understand their implications, ERP contract are cryptic. While legal expertise might help negotiate and comprehend the language, you won’t understand the true implications unless you have expertise with many software packages, enterprise architecture, and licensing arrangements. Also, the ERP contract terms change as vendors update their pricing and configuration, more frequently than you would expect.

Also, the challenge is not just the complexity of  ERP contracts. It’s also the refined negotiation skills of ERP salespeople. With proprietary knowledge to their advantage, they are trained negotiators. Unless you have access to the same proprietary knowledge to be at the same level, you can never beat them. And having this knowledge is only possible when you have someone with a similar skillset on your side. This is why ERP selection consultants and ERP sales reps make a good offense and defense combination.

Top 10 ERP Contract Terms

Finally, most buyers are so biased in seeking discounts and the cheapest quote, with a limited attention span to identify and understand the risks buried with ERP contracts. The risks could be as severe as data loss or not understanding the ownership of components packaged with the software. The ERP contract terms outlined below will help you identify the risks buried with the ERP contracts and avoid any surprises after signing one.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

1. Editions and Modules

Understanding editions and modules and how they map to each SKU in ERP contracts is essential to avoid financial surprises post signing. Not familiar with editions and modules and how they work? Software vendors commonly price their products based on editions and modules. The main challenge with editions and modules is their overlap and configuration bundles, which means different bundling arrangements might have the exact same outcome but very different price points and risk profiles. So you need to make sure that you have the complete grasp of the fine lines around editions and modules.

To get the maximum discount, experiment with different configurations of editions and modules. But, don’t forget to understand their limitations. This requires a deep probing of how these editions and modules are structured and function, which may go beyond what the sales representatives can provide.

2. License Terms

Even the most friendly ERP OEMs who claim to be consumption-based would require you to commit to the ERP contract terms, with very little flexibility in making any changes. The variables that have an impact because of the license term would be the number of users, types of licenses, and tiers of licenses. As well as the scope and duration of the agreement. 

Once the contract is signed, scaling up the number of seats or expanding the scope of your ERP system is generally straightforward as this leads to additional revenue for them.  But scaling down is a revenue loss for them, so they are likely to make it as difficult as possible. In most cases, prorated adjustments to your ERP contract terms might not be possible, unless the agreement explicitly articulates this provision.

3. User Access and User Types

Each ERP system and vendor is likely to have very different user access tiers and types. Even among different versions of the same product, the user access and types might vary. The user access and types could have several variables such as limited access vs full access users. Concurrent vs named users. Devices licenses vs application users. They each have implications on what users will do with the application and might drive the total contract value substantially. 

Unless you have gone through rounds of due diligence, which is rare for most companies due to the amount of effort and investment required in the selection phase. Also, the perceived limited value of the due diligence might trigger companies to short-circuit the due diligence process, and because of this architecture might not be fully developed, limiting the visibility into access types required. You might also not have complete visibility into users’ workflow and how they will be using the software. 

These issues collectively might drive changes to user access and types, leading to substantial financial surprises after signing the contract, which even the initially offered discounts might not be able to make up for. Therefore, it’s essential to perform the due diligence to an extent where you have relative confidence in the total contract value. And you are not being myopic with discounts. The ERP selection consultants can help you plan the user access and types better with limited financial surprises.

4. Reseller Tiers

Generally dictated by ERP publishers, each reseller is generally at a specific tier, which drives their discount and pricing, as well as the price and discounts they can offer you. The OEM typically determines these tiers based on various factors, such as the reseller’s sales performance, expertise, and commitment to selling the OEM’s products, including ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software and services.

OEMs often provide more generous discounts to new resellers to their partnership program. This is a strategic move to encourage newer partners to sell the ERP software and services actively, essentially helping the OEM build their customer base and expand their market presence. But wait, this might only be applicable for the first few deals, after that they are likely to lose this privilege as they will need to match the performance with their larger peers to be able to receive the same discounts.

Understanding their tier would be especially critical while switching resellers. The discount ERP contract terms and the overall agreement may not be the same with a new reseller as with the previous one. Therefore, it’s essential to carefully analyze the implications and terms of such a change to ensure it aligns with the company’s objectives and budget.

5. Discounts

Each vendors have their own discounting strategy, some keep their list pricing higher and discount heavily. The others, on the other hand, are likely to offer much lower discounts. The discounts could be up to 50-60% off the original list price, but they might also vary per line item. This is especially true with implementation and support line items. They might not offer as deep discounts. Some discounts might be available only in certain regions or with certain types of resellers, depending upon the strategic priority of the OEM. 

Some discounts could also be timely. The discounts are likely to be higher in Q4 as ERP vendors might be trying to meet their numbers for the year and might offer much heavier discount. While planning your ERP implementation around discounts is a great idea, don’t make your decisions purely based on discounts. This is especially true while signing the ERP contracts. Don’t rush to sign an ERP contract just because the discounts might expire. Generally, ERP vendors match up the offer if the decision is likely to be purely based on price especially if they might not have a true differentiator.

The discounting might vary per rep as well, just because ERP vendors carry hundreds of SKUs and several different pricing and discounting strategies. Depending upon the skillset of the rep, you might not the best discount just because they might not understand all permutations and combinations. This is where ERP selection consultants can help. They have access to thousands of their previous quotes and can compare the discount at the line level, ensuring maximum discounts, without assuming unnecessary risk that might lead to financial surprises.

6. Price Lock

The decision about how long to sign the ERP contract might be tricky. If you sign up for a longer term and if the software doesn’t work to your expectations, you might be locked in the contract even if you are not able to use the software. But the shorter the term, the lower the discount. In the case of implementation issues, most ERP vendors might offer suggestions such as changing resellers or another round of implementation methodology but if there are serious implementation challenges due to the design of the software, you may end up losing even more. This would be true even after paying for the full term of the contract, without getting any value from the software. 

So depending upon the risk profile of the project, you need to assess the right length of the contract. Don’t sign for longer term contracts purely because of discounts. Make an informed decision based on the risk profile of your implementation.

7. More Users/Feature Discount Guarantee

This clause addresses the situation where an organization plans to expand its usage of the ERP system by adding more users or activating additional features beyond what was initially agreed upon in the ERP contract. In such cases, the software vendor might have mechanisms to negotiate the pricing for these additional users or features.

Instead of guaranteeing the cheapest initial quote, some ERP vendors provide a different kind of assurance – a discount guarantee for future purchases or modifications. This means that if you decide to scale up your ERP usage by adding more users or enabling new features, the vendor commits to providing you with the same discounted rate, ensuring that you don’t pay the expensive list price.

By including this clause, you ensure that the favorable pricing and discounts you negotiated during the initial contract negotiation phase will still be applicable even when you make changes to the ERP system. This can help avoid unexpected expenses, accommodating your to-be state as you learn more about your needs in the implementation phase.

8. License Price Increase

Most ERP vendors understand that customers are not likely to switch from their ERP system once they are settled on it. Also, winning an ERP deal is extremely challenging because of the same issue. For these reasons, ERP vendors offer substantial discounts in the initial years. But the increase is likely to be steep with renewal. 

Sometimes the increase might be so steep that smaller companies might struggle to afford it. That’s why negotiating a license price increase is essential. Some vendors are fair and they might not increase more than 5% and will be willing to include that provision. The other vendors might be tricky to work with and might discount the pricing so much in the initial years that a 5% increase or including such provision might not be feasible. Have a clause for the license increase baked in as part of the contract, even if you sign a shorter term contract.

Also, coverage of all items as part of the license price increase clause is critical. In some cases, if several third-party add-ons are included as part of the solution, the ERP vendor might not be able to guarantee the license price increase on those line items. In fact, changes in add-ons might also drive architectural changes and as a result, licensing, which might not be covered by the license price increase clause. Perform a risk analysis of each line item and assess if there might be any charges that might not be covered by the license price increase clause.

9. License Fee Waived Off First Year

When a vendor offers to “waive off” the license fee for the first year, it means they are willing to provide the ERP software to the customer for the initial year without charging the regular annual licensing fee. This offer is often made to ensure that customers only pay when they use the software in production. During the test phase, the cost for the ERP vendor is relatively low as the test infrastructure or the cloud instance is likely to be on inferior infrastructure and some vendors are willing to do that to ensure that the customers are not paying twice as they are likely to still pay for their old software while they implement and test the new one.

However, it’s crucial to understand that while waiving the license fee for the first year can be financially beneficial in the short term, it may impact the overall cost of the ERP solution over the long term. To evaluate the true cost-effectiveness of this arrangement, it is advisable to create a comprehensive cost schedule that takes into account all costs associated with the ERP implementation over a more extended period, such as 5 to 10 years. 

10. Financing Options

Many ERP vendors may collaborate with third-party financial institutions to offer this option to their clients. However, it’s crucial to understand that ERP vendors often use this financing option as a negotiation tool to gain leverage on other ERP contract terms. They might expect concessions in other areas, such as customization, support, or pricing, in exchange for offering financing. Therefore, businesses should carefully assess whether this financing option aligns with their needs and objectives.

Suppose the financing option is not directly relevant to your situation, or you have access to other external funding sources. In that case, it may be wiser to concentrate on the contractual clauses likely to impact your overall cost structure significantly. Ultimately, the decision to utilize the financing option should be based on a thorough evaluation of your financial circumstances and the specific conditions outlined in the ERP contract. By doing so, you can ensure that you make informed choices that are in the best interest of your organization’s ERP implementation project.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

11. User Limit by Version

Your current edition and version may restrict the number of users that you can have on that version. If you outgrow that, then you need to switch to the next version, which might be more expensive than the smaller version. It’s crucial to understand your current version and edition to determine how this will impact your future pricing. Additionally, ensure that the price lock remains applicable if you switch versions or editions.

12. Transaction Restrictions

Similar to user limits, your current edition may also have transaction restrictions. Upon reaching these limits, you may be required to upgrade to a higher, more costly tier. It’s worth noting that the nature of transactions can vary substantially across industries. For industries with low-value transactions, such as retail, these restrictions can be particularly important during contract negotiations. Be sure to assess the implications of transaction limits.

13. Infrastructure Price Changes

Similar to third-party add-ons, ERP vendors may have limited control over the underlying infrastructure. Furthermore, claims of unlimited users may come with unexpressed restrictions. It’s essential to comprehend any imposed limitations to enable an unlimited model fully. These limits could pertain to storage, bandwidth, speed, infrastructure, and additional charges for add-ons. In some cases, these charges might surpass the licensing costs.

14. Application User Pricing

Pricing for application users or connectors may deviate from the pricing structure for named users. Familiarize yourself with the pricing variables, such as the number of transactions, API calls, queue messages, and other factors. Typically, these users need higher technical expertise to estimate transaction volumes accurately.

15. Third-Party Products and Warranties

ERP contracts are similar to complex bills of materials involving various dependencies, white-labeled add-ons, and products owned by third parties. Scrutinize the contracts and request the vendor to clearly specify the software products where warranty coverage may depend on their relationships with the vendors. Identify all the connections between the software providers and their vendors and how these relationships are established. Assess the potential consequences of losing these relationships and understand the warranties, especially in the context of pass-through warranties.

16. Ownership of Custom Code and Intellectual Property

Resellers or Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) may customize the software for you but might not grant access to the code, limiting your ability to seek support in the future. If a reseller or ISV plans to utilize any intellectual property (IP), ensure the contract includes provisions specifying ownership.

17. Data Ownership

Each ERP vendor may have distinct policies regarding data ownership. Thoroughly review the contract provisions to understand the format in which data will be provided and the duration for data access or deletion in the event of contract termination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ERP contracts require expertise to uncover financial risks that might not be as obvious to a layperson. By understanding these ERP contract terms, you will be empowered to negotiate and minimize financial risks. Remember, ERP selection is only the beginning; managing change and ensuring the terms of your contract align with your business goals are ongoing processes. Having a knowledgeable ally by your side, one who keeps abreast of industry developments can be invaluable. So, as you embark on your ERP journey, don’t take ERP contracts lightly as they might fire back in ways you wouldn’t expect. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Top 6 Cloud ERP vs On-Premise ERP Differences

In today’s evolving business landscape, ERP systems play an important role in streamlining operations, enhancing efficiency, and providing real-time insights to support decision-making. When it comes to ERP implementation, businesses often face a crucial decision: choosing between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP. Each option has its unique advantages and drawbacks, and the choice largely depends on your organization’s specific needs and objectives. Therefore, here are six criteria that might help you choose between the two:



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Top 6 Cloud ERP vs On-Premise ERP Differences

1. Contractual Model

One of the fundamental differences when choosing between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP lies in their contractual models. Cloud ERP typically operates under a subscription services agreement, often referred to as software as a service (SaaS). This means that when you opt for a cloud ERP solution, you essentially enter into a recurring fee arrangement. Much like a monthly or annual subscription, you pay for access to the software for a predetermined period. This subscription-based model offers businesses a pay-as-you-go approach, allowing them to access the ERP system without needing a substantial upfront investment.

On the other hand, the contractual model for on-premise ERP follows a different path. It involves a one-time license fee for purchasing the software. In addition to the upfront licensing cost, businesses need to budget for periodic maintenance and support fees to ensure the software remains updated and well-supported. Unlike the cloud ERP’s subscription-based approach, on-premise ERP necessitates a significant initial investment in the license fee. This cost model often results in higher upfront expenses, making it crucial for organizations to weigh the benefits of perpetual ownership against the immediate financial implications. Therefore, the choice between these two contractual models represents a fundamental decision point in ERP selection, heavily influenced by the organization’s financial capacity, long-term strategy, and budgeting preferences.

2. Fee Structure

When it comes to cloud ERP, businesses must pay a periodic subscription fee. This fee grants them access to the ERP software for a specific duration, much like a monthly or annual subscription to an online service. This subscription model provides a high degree of flexibility and scalability, making it a compelling option for organizations seeking to effectively manage their expenditures while maintaining the capacity to adapt to evolving business requirements. Cloud ERP’s subscription-based fee structure offers the advantage of pay-as-you-go, allowing businesses to pay for what they use and adjust their subscription as their needs change. This financial agility is particularly appealing to smaller enterprises and those operating in dynamic environments where the ability to scale resources up or down is a critical requirement.

In contrast, the fee structure for on-premise ERP significantly diverges from cloud-based counterparts. When opting for an on-premise ERP system, an organization must make a one-time payment as a license fee to acquire the software. This initial license fee can be a substantial upfront investment. However, this is not the end of the financial commitment. Ongoing maintenance and support fees are obligatory to ensure the software remains up-to-date, well-supported, and compliant with changing regulations and business requirements. These fees are recurrent and necessary to keep the software functioning optimally. While the up-front license fee grants perpetual ownership of the software, these additional recurring costs are crucial for maintaining the efficiency, security, and functionality of the on-premise ERP system

This fee structure reflects a different approach to financial investment, emphasizing a one-time capital outlay followed by recurring operational expenses. This approach might be more suitable for larger enterprises with the capacity to invest significantly upfront and maintain dedicated IT staff to manage the system.

3. Rights

Cloud ERP operates under a subscription model, meaning that your organization essentially rents the software for the subscription period. This arrangement offers flexibility, allowing businesses to scale their usage up or down as needed, and it provides a sense of agility. However, it’s crucial to understand that your right to access and use the software is contingent on the continuation of your subscription. Once the subscription period ends, so does your access. This can be a double-edged sword, as it provides adaptability but also means ongoing costs.

On the other hand, on-premise ERP takes a different approach by offering a perpetual license. This means that, upon purchase, your organization secures the right to use the software indefinitely. This can particularly appeal to businesses looking for a long-term, one-time investment. It essentially grants you ownership of the software, providing a sense of control and independence. However, it’s important to note that this perpetual license doesn’t necessarily cover ongoing support and maintenance, which typically come with additional costs. The choice between these models hinges on your organization’s specific needs and long-term objectives. Cloud ERP’s subscription model suits those seeking flexibility and scalability, while on-premise ERP’s perpetual license is favored by those aiming for a lasting investment with full control over the software.

4. Hosting Model

The hosting model in the cloud ERP versus on-premise ERP comparison defines the ownership and management of the enterprise architecture where your ERP system resides. In the case of cloud ERP, the hosting responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of the ERP vendor. This means the vendor sets up, maintains, and manages the servers and the underlying infrastructure required for the ERP system to function. They are also responsible for ensuring the system runs smoothly and any technical issues or updates are addressed promptly. This hands-off approach can appeal to businesses as it relieves them of the burden of managing IT infrastructure, which can be resource-intensive.

In contrast, on-premise ERP shifts the hosting responsibility to the customer. When an organization opts for an on-premise solution, they need to invest in and maintain their own servers and IT infrastructure to house the ERP system. This entails purchasing the necessary hardware, setting up data centers or server rooms, and having IT personnel oversee the ongoing enterprise architecture maintenance and support. While this approach provides greater control and privacy over data, it also requires a significant upfront investment and ongoing operational costs. It’s important to carefully assess your organization’s IT capabilities and resources when considering the hosting model, as it can substantially impact the long-term management of your ERP system.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

5. Application Backup And Redundancy

Data backup and redundancy are fundamental to any robust ERP system, ensuring business continuity and data integrity. When it comes to cloud ERP, these aspects are typically handled by the vendor, relieving the user’s burden. The vendor implements automated data backup processes, regularly copying and storing your data in secure, off-site locations. This meticulous approach minimizes the risk of data loss in case of unexpected events, such as hardware failures, natural disasters, or cyberattacks. In essence, your data is well-protected and can be swiftly restored, reducing downtime and potential financial losses.

Conversely, with on-premise ERP, your organization is responsible for application backup and redundancy. This entails investing in backup solutions, establishing comprehensive project recovery plans, and maintaining the necessary infrastructure to safeguard your data. While this approach grants you greater control over your data’s security and recovery processes, it requires substantial resources, including IT expertise and budget allocation. Failing to adequately address these aspects can result in prolonged system downtime and potential data loss, making it critical for on-premise ERP users to proactively manage their data backup and redundancy solutions to maintain business continuity.

6. Software Source Code Modifications

Customization significantly tailors an ERP system to align with a business’s specific needs and processes. The customization differs significantly in the context of cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP. Cloud ERP solutions typically limit the extent of customization permitted by the vendor. While you may have some flexibility to configure settings, make minor adjustments, and personalize certain aspects of the system, extensive modifications to the software’s source code are generally restricted in cloud-based systems. This limitation is mainly in place to maintain system stability and ensure that customizations don’t interfere with the software’s core functionality. Cloud ERP providers aim to provide standardized, easily maintainable solutions that cater to a broad range of businesses, so they often limit deep-level source code alterations.

Conversely, on-premise ERP software offers a more significant degree of flexibility when it comes to software source code modifications. Businesses can often negotiate with the ERP vendor to make changes customizations, or fine-tune the source code to align more closely with their highly specialized or unique requirements. This extensive customization ability is a major advantage for businesses with intricate processes or specific industry demands. With on-premise ERP, you have greater control over the software’s underlying code, allowing you to create a more tailored solution. However, it’s essential to recognize that this level of customization may require a skilled IT team and lead to higher ERP implementation and maintenance costs, as well as the need for more significant oversight to ensure that the system remains stable and secure.

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP depends on your organization’s specific needs, budget, and IT infrastructure capabilities. Cloud ERP offers flexibility, scalability, and hands-off management, making it suitable for businesses looking to streamline operations quickly. On the other hand, on-premise ERP provides a long-term investment with greater control over customization and data management. 

Carefully assessing your business requirements and considering the factors mentioned above will help you make an informed decision and choose the ERP solution that aligns with your objectives and growth plans. Ultimately, both options have their strengths, and the right choice is the one that best serves your unique business needs. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Top 10 TMS Systems In 2024

What exactly is a TMS system? The interpretation can vary depending on who you ask. In the transportation and 3PL sectors, a TMS essentially functions as their ERP, overseeing up to 90% of their processes. Historically, TMS packages excluded accounting, relying on external accounting software like Sage or Microsoft GP. With the advent of cloud-based TMS systems, a comprehensive solution, including accounting, is now possible. This complexity adds an extra layer of challenge to the process of selecting a TMS system.

Similar to WMS, TMS systems come in various forms. At times, they function as tools for supply chain consulting firms to oversee their transportation clients. Given that certain TMS vendors may not exclusively be technology-focused, political considerations influence carrier participation in their network. These factors play a role in determining the quality of the rating algorithm and the insights derived from AI and ML.

Additionally, the scale of TMS systems can differ depending on their size. For example, smaller TMS systems may serve as basic shipping add-ons, offering streamlined features like rate shopping. In contrast, larger TMS systems not only encompass all transportation modes but may also include a carrier network and other integrated supply chain capabilities. So for those seeking a TMS solution, grasping the impact of these layers on TMS scope is crucial. Now, let’s explore the top 10 TMS systems in 2024.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Criteria

  • Overall market share/# of customers: How large is the market share of this TMS product? TMS vendors‘ overall market share is irrelevant for this list if they have multiple TMS products in their portfolio. 
  • Ownership/funding: Who owns the TMS vendor? Is it a private equity company, a family or a group of families, or a wealthy corporate investor?
  • Quality of development (legacy vs. legacy dressed as modern vs. modern UX/cloud-native): How modern is the tech stack? Not clunky! How aggressively is the TMS vendor pushing cloud-native functionality for this product? No fake clouds! Is the roadmap officially announced? Or uncertain?
  • Community/Ecosystem: How vibrant is the community? Social media groups? In-person user groups? Forums?
  • Depth of native functionality (for specific industries): Last-mile functionality for specific industries natively built into the product?
  • Quality of publicly available product documentation: How well-documented is the product? Is the documentation available publicly? How updated is the demo content available on YouTube?
  • Product share and documented commitment (of the publisher through financial statements): Is the product share reported separately in financial statements if the TMS  vendor is public?
  • Acquisition strategy aligned with the product: Are there any recent acquisitions to fill a specific hole with this product? Are there any official announcements to integrate recently acquired capabilities?
  • Maturity of the Supply Chain Suite: How mature are other capabilities that would augment TMS, such as WMS, S&OP, and the network?
  • User Reviews: How specific are the reviews about this product’s capabilities? How recent and frequent are the reviews?
  • Must be a TMS product: Must be a recognized TMS product by several analyst firms with a proven track record and market share.

10. CH Robinson/Navisphere TMS

Navisphere, a TMS solution provided by supply chain consulting firm CH Robinson, is tailored for companies seeking both supply chain subject matter expertise and a technical solution. However, it may not be the ideal choice for those solely seeking a TMS solution without managed services. So opt for CH Robinson if you require a TMS solution supporting multiple transportation modes, including managed services from a single vendor.

Pros
  1. Network strength of CH Robinson. A notable advantage is the robustness of CH Robinson’s proprietary network, influencing rates and providing quality insights.
  2. Supply chain industry expertise. CH Robinson brings extensive subject matter knowledge and holds licenses for various transportation modes, eliminating the need for third-party consulting firms.
  3. Comprehensive supply chain services. CH Robinson serves as a one-stop shop for various supply chain needs, particularly excelling in the food and produce market.
Cons
  1. Potential conflict of interest. Some may perceive CH Robinson’s pricing algorithm as biased, leading to concerns about carriers avoiding collaboration due to potential conflicts of interest.
  2. Not a pure TMS solution. While smaller companies exclusively working with CH Robinson might find it suitable as a TMS solution, it may not be the best fit for those collaborating with multiple vendors.
  3. Limited to the CH Robinson network. A significant limitation is that the solution is confined to the CH Robinson network

9. Trimble TMS

Trimble, a robust TMS solution tailored for transportation companies, stands out with its features for driver compliance, reporting, and monitoring. While an excellent fit for the trucking or 3PL industry managing internal fleets, Trimble TMS may not be suitable for businesses with non-transportation-centric models, such as retail or manufacturing. 

Opting for Trimble is advisable if you operate in the trucking or 3PL sector, particularly with an internal fleet. However, for cloud-native solutions, especially in industries with different business models, exploring other options may be more appropriate. Choose Trimble if you are in the trucking or 3PL industry with an internal fleet, but look elsewhere for cloud-native solutions, especially in industries without transportation-like business models.

Pros
  1. Maps and telematics. Trimble facilitates accurate data collection from drivers, minimizing errors and operational overhead.
  2. Tailored for trucking companies. Designed with unique TMS capabilities essential for trucking operations, including dispatch, scheduling, and batch load planning.
  3. Pre-built compliance for trucking. Compliance requirements are seamlessly integrated into operational workflows, reducing administrative efforts for trucking companies.
Cons
  1. Legacy technology. While functionally strong, Trimble’s solution relies on legacy technology.
  2. Limited industry focus. Due to its industry-specific focus, Trimble may not be the optimal choice for diverse companies.
  3. Not fully independent. Similar to CH Robinson, Trimble provides managed services, making it less independent than some solutions on this list.

8. Descartes TMS

Descartes proves to be an excellent choice for companies seeking multi-modal capabilities within their international supply chain networks. It also has another TMS platform in its portfolio tailored for trucking companies and 3PL providers, providing options for multiple market segments. 

Opt for Descartes if you require a best-of-breed TMS solution with multi-modal capabilities and operate within a large enterprise setting. Descartes might also have options for smaller trucking companies as well as 3PL with smaller operations.

Pros
  1. Managed services available. Descartes TMS provides managed services, offering support for international regulatory and compliance requirements.
  2. Comprehensive TMS with international data analytics. The solution is a comprehensive TMS featuring extensive capabilities, including a visibility platform for the international supply chain.
  3. Options for multiple Market Segments. Descartes has specific solutions for different market segments, covering their unique needs without pushing them for solutions that are one-size-fits-all.
Cons
  1. Not completely independent. Similar to CH Robinson, Descartes relies on managed services, which may limit its independence.
  2. May not be SMB-friendly. SMB companies seeking a cost-effective solution might find Descartes to be relatively expensive.
  3. Not a complete suite with WMS, etc. As a best-of-breed TMS solution, Descartes requires integration with external systems, such as WMS and S&OP, to achieve parity with other solutions on this list.

7. Mercury Gate

Mercury Gate, a cloud-native TMS solution, caters to SMB companies transitioning from smaller shipping add-ons like Pacejet or ShipStation. However, it may not be the optimal choice for large enterprises or businesses with international supply chains.

Consider Mercury Gate if you are an SMB DTC or CPG company seeking a cloud-native solution. On the contrary, if you are an enterprise or have an international supply chain, Mercury Gate may not align with your requirements.

Pros
  1. Fleet management and last-mile capabilities. Particularly beneficial for companies in the CPG and DTC space.
  2. Claims management capabilities. Aiding in freight audits for companies with 3PL components in their business model.
  3. Cloud-native UI. Attractive for companies using cloud-native ERP solutions like NetSuite or Acumatica.
Cons
  1. Limited to North America. Mercury Gate currently focuses solely on North America, which may be restrictive for companies with international supply chains.
  2. Not integrated with other platforms such as WMS. As a standalone TMS solution, it lacks integration with a complete suite, including pre-integrated WMS or S&OP, posing a limitation for budget-conscious companies.
  3. Limiting reporting capabilities. Users have reported that the reporting capabilities are not as pre-configured compared to some other platforms.

6. 3Gtms TMS (Pacejet)

3Gtms, tailored for SMB trucking companies and bolstered by the Pacejet acquisition, expands its capabilities to cover not just LTL and FTL but also parcel shipments. However, it’s not the ideal choice for large enterprises.

Consider 3Gtms if you seek a TMS solution encompassing all transportation modes—LTL, FTL, and parcels—for domestic shippers with some international presence. Nevertheless, if you are in pursuit of a cloud-native experience with a sophisticated supply chain suite, 3Gtms might not align with your requirements.

Pros
  1. SMB-friendly. The solution offers advanced dispatch and load management capabilities, catering to the needs of SMBs.
  2. Complete shipping solution. Encompassing all transportation modes for domestic shippers, 3Gtms provides a comprehensive shipping solution, albeit with a focus on SMBs.
  3. Ideal for light TMS needs. Particularly useful for companies with light shipping requirements, especially those seeking a native or hybrid experience within SMB ERP ecosystems like Acumatica or Infor CloudSuite Industrial (Syteline).
Cons
  1. Not enterprise and integrated suite. Lacking components found in larger supply chain suites, 3Gtms is not the best fit for large enterprises.
  2. May require add-ons for advanced capabilities. Advanced features may necessitate third-party add-ons or customization, potentially limiting applicability to all business models.
  3. Patchy User Experience. While the PaceJet solution is cloud-native, the older components remain legacy, potentially affecting the overall user experience.

5. e2open (BlueJays/Cloud Logistics)

e2open stands out as the most comprehensive suite, offering balanced capabilities in execution, planning, and network. It caters to enterprises seeking a pre-integrated suite with robust planning and forecasting, leveraging AI and ML. However, it may not be the ideal choice for smaller companies.

Consider e2open if you are a large enterprise utilizing SAP or Oracle, seeking an enterprise-grade supply chain suite to manage international supply chains, especially if collaborative planning and forecasting with suppliers are essential.

Pros
  1. All Modes. The execution component covers road, rail, ocean, and air, boasting strong enterprise-grade capabilities.
  2. Global Reach. e2open spans a broad geographic reach, encompassing most regions worldwide, providing an advantage over smaller solutions.
  3. Ideal for Collaboration-Centric Businesses. With robust capabilities for channel-centric businesses and integrated TMS capabilities, e2open suits companies seeking a comprehensive, pre-integrated suite.
Cons
  1. Not as Complete as Some Competitors. While highly comprehensive, e2open may not boast the strongest TMS solution compared to others on this list, especially in areas like in-house fleet and driver compliance.
  2. Not SMB-Friendly. The solution’s complexity and cost may be overwhelming for SMBs.
  3. Limited Ecosystem. Being relatively new in the market, e2open has a somewhat limited ecosystem compared to more established solutions.

4. Manhattan Associates

Manhattan is renowned for its WMS but also integrates TMS capabilities into its Supply Chain suite, which is particularly beneficial for industries with substantial retail store traffic like apparel, footwear, or grocery. Ideal for those already using Manhattan WMS, it provides integrated TMS functionality, though not recommended for SMBs.

Choose Manhattan TMS if you are currently utilizing or considering Manhattan as part of your architectural framework.

Pros
  1. Pre-Integrated with WMS. Simplifies operations for companies with limited IT capabilities or a constrained budget, although pre-integrated workflows should be thoroughly assessed based on specific use cases.
  2. Suited for Retail-Centric Industries. Manhattan’s focus on retail ensures robust TMS workflows for high-volume grocery, apparel, and shoe verticals.
Cons
  1. TMS as an Add-On. TMS is not Manhattan’s primary offering, potentially lacking the mature capabilities found in best-of-breed TMS systems.
  2. Not for SMBs. Tailored for upper-mid market and enterprise segments, it may overwhelm SMBs with its extensive features.
  3. Expensive. Geared towards enterprises, Manhattan’s premium offering might be costly for SMBs not requiring advanced enterprise features.

3. SAP Transportation Management

SAP transportation management solutions cater primarily to companies already entrenched in SAP technologies, especially SAP EWM, seeking to build their entire tech stack on SAP. These solutions are well-suited for large enterprises with product-centric operations and distributors, especially with complex business models such as 3PL.

Smaller companies may find SAP’s offerings overwhelming. Opt for an SAP transportation management solution if you need an execution component pre-integrated with SAP technologies, compatible with other enterprise-grade solutions like e2open or Project44.

Pros
  1. Pre-Integrated with SAP Suite. SAP TM seamlessly integrates with other SAP offerings within the SAP S/4 HANA suite, particularly EWM, though careful vetting is essential to ensure compatibility with unique use cases.
  2. Ideal for Large Enterprises (> $10B). Companies exceeding $10 billion in size, requiring global compliance and transactional traceability, stand to gain the most value from SAP transportation management.
  3. Ideal for Complex Business Models. Companies with intricate business models, such as distributors with 3PL operations or 3PL firms needing comprehensive billing functionality, will find SAP’s solution compelling.
Cons
  1. Relies on Descartes for Carrier Communication. External communication and document management may not be as advanced as other solutions, necessitating additional expenses, such as Descartes, for carrier communication.
  2. Requires Add-Ons for Comparison with Manhattan and Blue Yonder. Achieving parity with other components of a supply chain suite may demand several costly add-ons not readily available with SAP.
  3. Not Suitable for SMBs. SMBs may find SAP’s capabilities not only overwhelming but also cost-prohibitive due to their alignment with more mature functionalities.

2. Blue Yonder

Blue Yonder boasts one of the most robust supply chain suites, encompassing various facets, including planning and execution, with a particularly robust execution component for transportation management. 

Notably, Blue Yonder distinguishes itself from e2open by leveraging network and data from partners, while e2open operates on its proprietary network. Blue Yonder stands out with a significant number of enterprise-grade installations compared to other vendors. Opt for Blue Yonder if you need a fully integrated supply chain suite, specially tailored for retail-centric industries, covering diverse areas, from execution to planning.

Pros
  1. Comprehensive Supply Chain Suite. Blue Yonder offers one of the most comprehensive supply chain suites, aligning particularly well with retailers due to its data model.
  2. Ideal for Enterprises. Enterprises aiming for supply chain process maturity will find Blue Yonder’s capabilities valuable, designed to seamlessly integrate global supply chain processes.
  3. Global Supply Chain Capabilities with Control Tower. Blue Yonder’s supply chain spans all modes and geographies, providing end-to-end traceability for global supply chain operations.
Cons
  1. Not for SMBs. SMBs seeking simpler solutions may find Blue Yonder overwhelming.
  2. Not Ideal for Standalone TMS Needs. The integrated suite might be excessive for companies seeking straightforward capabilities to manage transportation and logistics processes independently.
  3. Expensive. Companies seeking simpler solutions might perceive Blue Yonder’s mature capabilities as costly.

1. Oracle TMS

Much like SAP, Oracle excels in providing enterprise-grade execution components for transportation management, particularly in industries where tight collaboration with other Oracle solutions like ERP or RMS is essential. 

This is especially beneficial for sectors with stringent compliance and regulatory requirements, such as international trade compliance and reporting. So opt for Oracle TMS if you require enterprise-grade transportation solutions with a dynamic ecosystem integrating best-of-breed capabilities for other components of the supply chain suite.

Pros
  1. Pre-Integrated with Oracle ERP. Oracle TMS offers a seamlessly embedded experience with WMS, RMS, and ERP, a feature not available in standalone systems.
  2. Ideal for Retail and Transportation-Centric Industries. With a strong presence in retail and transportation verticals, Oracle’s R&D focus caters to the unique needs of these sectors.
  3. Global Supply Chain Capabilities with Control Tower. Oracle TMS spans all transportation modes globally, ensuring end-to-end traceability of the execution component and featuring control tower capabilities.
Cons
  1. Not for SMBs. SMBs seeking simpler solutions may find Oracle’s enterprise capabilities overwhelming and unnecessary.
  2. Not Ideal for Standalone TMS Needs. Companies desiring straightforward standalone TMS solutions without impacting other departments or processes might find Oracle to be too comprehensive.
  3. Expensive. Enterprises seeking simpler solutions may perceive Oracle’s enterprise-grade features as overwhelming and unnecessarily costly.
+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Conclusion

Much like other enterprise software categories, TMS systems come in various configurations. The suitability of a TMS system for a business largely depends on how it aligns with the enterprise architecture and business model.

If you’re considering a TMS system, it’s crucial to distinguish between systems provided by consulting firms and those by pure-play technology firms. Delve into your business model and enterprise architecture to evaluate which system aligns best with your needs. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with Independent TMS consultants.

FAQs

Team collaboration in an ERP environment - Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams.

Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams

If you can build the consensus as part of your ERP projects, your ERP implementation will likely be successful. Building consensus is always the first challenge. Since ERP implementations involve various teams and stakeholders, the challenges associated with it are multifaceted if everybody is not on the same page. What consensus does not usually represent is when decision-making in the organization is very centralized and is not spread across the departments.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

If a broad consensus does not exist among the leadership team, the management team, and even the process owners, it can make the ERP project fall apart if the controller walks out of it in the middle of the project. It can be a nightmare. Therefore, in this blog, we will explore the top 10 strategies to build consensus among ERP teams. 

Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams

1. Establishing Clear Goals and Objectives

The ERP implementation process should always begin with setting crystal-clear objectives and goals. Keeping the goals straightforward and comprehensive cannot be stressed enough. For example, if your existing ERP system is outdated and you wish to upgrade to the latest technology, this simple and high-level goal can be the guiding light for the entire team. These goals act as a foundation upon which the strategies and actions are built, ensuring that everyone is moving in the same direction.

A balanced approach, in this case, always works to establish clear goals and objectives. Simply asking team members, “What do you want to do?” might lead to uncertainty and vague responses. Therefore,  providing a framework or structure for these goals, and then seeking input and feedback from team members, can be highly effective. By offering guidelines and allowing team members to have their say within a defined framework, you strike a balance between giving them a sense of involvement and providing a structured direction.

2. Leadership Commitment and Engagement

Effective ERP implementation requires leadership that leads by example. When leaders are actively engaged and committed to the project, their enthusiasm becomes contagious. Their involvement sets the tone for the entire team, demonstrating the importance of the ERP project. In essence, they act as cheerleaders, rallying the troops and showing that they believe in the project’s potential. Leadership commitment is essential not only to encourage the team but also to convey the message that this ERP implementation is a top priority for the organization. When team members see that leaders are dedicated, they are more likely to follow suit, building consensus around the project’s significance.

3. Effective Communication and Transparency

Open and transparent communication is the lifeblood of any successful ERP project. Clear communication channels ensure team members are on the same page and aware of project developments. Transparency fosters trust, as team members feel informed and included in the decision-making process. It also helps in addressing concerns early, preventing any misalignments or misunderstandings from derailing the project.

Effective communication generally includes regular team meetings, progress updates, and a willingness to listen to team members’ feedback and concerns. Moreover, providing straightforward answers to questions and being candid about potential challenges and roadblocks will further enhance the team’s understanding and willingness to support the project.

4. Inclusive Team Collaboration

ERP implementations often involve various teams and departments within an organization. To build consensus, it’s essential to foster inclusive team collaboration. This means breaking down silos and encouraging different functional teams to work together. By involving all relevant departments, you can ensure that no critical perspectives or needs are overlooked. Cross-functional collaboration also instills a sense of ownership within the team as they collectively contribute to shaping the ERP system.

In practice, you can create interdisciplinary teams that consist of members from different departments who work together to understand and address the unique requirements of their respective functions. This approach encourages a collaborative spirit and ensures that all voices are heard. When everyone has a say in how the ERP system will work for their department, it paves the way for stronger consensus and alignment across the organization.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

5. Identifying and Addressing Stakeholder Concerns

ERP implementations can be a source of uncertainty and apprehension for many stakeholders. It’s crucial to identify and address their concerns proactively. The hesitation to embrace change is a common issue, and it’s vital to understand these concerns. Open dialogue is the key to resolving these doubts and gaining consensus.

Stakeholder concerns can vary widely, from fears of job displacement to worries about workflow disruption. A crucial step is to engage with stakeholders directly, listen to their worries, and provide clear and honest responses. When their concerns are acknowledged and addressed, it can go a long way in building their trust and consensus in the ERP project. In addition to formal channels, informal conversations and feedback mechanisms should be established, ensuring that no issue remains unaddressed. By recognizing and dealing with these concerns, the ERP team can create a supportive environment that facilitates consensus-building.

6. Early User Involvement

End-users are the backbone of any ERP system. Their involvement should start from the project’s inception. It’s common for teams to claim that they understand the ERP system’s implications and are ready for implementation, but the actual testing reveals otherwise. To avoid such situations, engage end-users from the beginning.

Incorporating end-users in the initial stages allows them to take ownership of the project. Their hands-on insights are invaluable for tailoring the ERP system to meet their specific needs. Additionally, early involvement helps prevent surprises during testing and rollout, as issues are identified and resolved beforehand. When end-users have a say in shaping the system that will impact their daily work, they are more likely to embrace it enthusiastically.

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

7. Training and Skill Development

An ERP system is only as effective as the team using it. Providing comprehensive training and skill development programs is crucial for team members to navigate the system with confidence. Training should be an ongoing process, adapting to the evolving needs of the team and the ERP system itself.

Training ensures that team members are not only capable of using the ERP system but are also proficient in doing so. Proper training results in a smoother transition during system adoption and reduces the likelihood of errors or inefficiencies. Additionally, ongoing skill development keeps the team updated on new features and functionalities, maximizing the system’s potential and ensuring long-term consensus.

8. Change Management

Change is a natural part of any ERP implementation. Effective change management involves guiding teams through this transition period. The lack of change management can lead to confusion and resistance, which can hinder consensus.

A structured change management approach helps the team adapt to new processes and procedures with minimal disruption. It includes communicating the reasons for the changes, addressing concerns, and involving team members in the change process. Successful change management not only aids in building consensus but also streamlines the ERP implementation journey.

9. Recognizing And Addressing Red Flags

The ability to recognize early warning signs of resistance or misalignment within the ERP team is critical. The failure to identify and address red flags can lead to project delays and increased costs.

These red flags may include resistance to change, disputes over system functionalities, or a lack of engagement during team meetings. The key is to remain vigilant and address these issues promptly. Whether it’s by offering additional support, clarifying project goals, or revisiting training sessions, early intervention is crucial for maintaining consensus and ensuring a successful ERP implementation.

10. Building Consensus With Executives

While building consensus among team members is essential, it’s equally crucial to gain the support and alignment of executives. Some executives may not fully comprehend the operational intricacies of ERP implementations. Therefore, strategies are needed to ensure that executives are well-informed and engaged in the project.

Building consensus with executives involves providing them with a clear understanding of the project’s objectives, benefits, and potential challenges. It also entails keeping them actively involved in decision-making and ensuring that their expectations align with the project’s realities. When executives and team members share a common understanding and commitment to the ERP project, consensus is more likely to be achieved.

Conclusion


In conclusion, building consensus among ERP teams is a multifaceted process that involves clear objectives, strong leadership, transparent communication, and inclusive collaboration. Identifying and addressing stakeholder concerns, early user involvement, and comprehensive training are essential components of this journey. Effective change management and the ability to recognize red flags ensure that consensus is maintained throughout the project.

Building consensus with executives adds another layer of alignment. By implementing these strategies, ERP teams can navigate the challenges and complexities of ERP projects while achieving successful outcomes. Consensus within the team paves the way for a seamless ERP implementation and empowers organizations to leverage their systems effectively.

FAQs

Top 10 WMS Systems In 2024

Traditionally, ERP systems lacked WMS capabilities due to technological and architectural differences. However, with the advent of cloud technology, modern systems now include basic WMS features for mid-market users, eliminating concerns about complex integration or the need for a separate WMS package. Nevertheless, companies, even with simpler operations, often outgrow these basic capabilities and find the need for best-of-breed WMS software.

Once you reach this stage, the next step is to identify the most suitable best-of-breed WMS software. A crucial consideration emerges for companies with a 3PL focus, even if it constitutes a minor component of their business model. As distributors seek diversification, many explore 3PL offerings, leading to a warehouse architecture distinct from the traditional approach closely tied to inventory accounting. Moreover, the requirements for accelerated transactions and round-the-clock operations highlight the essential need for a dedicated warehouse management system.

With technological advancements, warehouse architecture has undergone significant evolution, comprising three key components: the warehouse management system (WMS), warehouse execution system (WES), and warehouse control system (WCS). The control system’s role is to transmit commands, facilitate integration with hardware, and ensure smooth coordination. The warehouse management system primarily handles data and inventory management, while the execution component unifies these functions. WMS solutions may offer some or all of these capabilities, often bundled with additional systems in their suite. Now, let’s explore the top 10 WMS systems in 2024.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Criteria

  • Overall market share/# of customers. How large is the market share of this WMS product? WMS vendors‘ overall market share is irrelevant for this list if they have multiple WMS products in their portfolio. 
  • Ownership/funding. Who owns the WMS vendor? Is it a private equity company, a family or a group of families, or a wealthy corporate investor?
  • Quality of development (legacy vs. legacy dressed as modern vs. modern UX/cloud-native). How modern is the tech stack? Not clunky! How aggressively is the WMS vendor pushing cloud-native functionality for this product? No fake clouds! Is the roadmap officially announced? Or uncertain?
  • Community/Ecosystem. How vibrant is the community? Social media groups? In-person user groups? Forums?
  • Depth of native functionality (for specific industries). Last-mile functionality for specific industries natively built into the product?
  • Quality of publicly available product documentation. How well-documented is the product? Is the documentation available publicly? How updated is the demo content available on YouTube?
  • Product share and documented commitment (of the publisher through financial statements). Is the product share reported separately in financial statements if the WMS vendor is public?
  • Acquisition strategy aligned with the product. Are there any recent acquisitions to fill a specific hole with this product? Are there any official announcements to integrate recently acquired capabilities?
  • Maturity of the Supply Chain Suite. How mature are other capabilities that would augment WMS, such as TMS, WMS, S&OP, and the network?
  • User Reviews. How specific are the reviews about this product’s capabilities? How recent and frequent are the reviews?
  • Must be a WMS product. Must be a recognized WMS product by several analyst firms with a proven track record and market share.

10. Tecsys 

Tecsys specializes in serving healthcare and retail sectors, offering unique capabilities tailored to specific verticals, particularly in point-of-use inventory management. While many WMS vendors may include hardware or have partnerships for devices and ASRS systems, Tecsys stands out with its focus on specialized hardware and interfaces crucial for point-of-use systems, which could be costly to develop on generic WMS platforms. 

These sectors also benefit from Tecsys’ robust multi-location inventory features, facilitating seamless goods transfer across various locations. Opt for Tecsys if you’re a mid-market healthcare or retail organization, especially if you have distinct needs they uniquely address.

Pros
  1. Point-of-use inventory management, with specialized hardware and interfaces, is crucial for traceability.
  2. Multi-location Capabilities are suitable for facilities with diverse locations, such as hospitals or retail businesses.
  3. eCommerce and retail-friendly with an integrated Order Management System (OMS), catering to budget-conscious mid-market Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) and e-commerce-centric companies.
Cons
  1. Outdated technology compared to some modern cloud-native options.
  2. Not a comprehensive suite like larger players such as Blue Yonder and Manhattan, lacking a full supply chain suite.
  3. Limited ecosystem and consulting options compared to other alternatives on the list.

9. Mobe3 WMS

Mobe3 WMS is among the more compact solutions featured on this list, commonly integrated into smaller ERP ecosystems. Despite its size, it boasts rich features tailored to support the specific requirements of smaller warehouses, particularly in process and batch-centric industries. 

These industries demand specialized capabilities, such as pallet and lot attributes, integrated into the solution. Opt for Mobe3 WMS if you are a small organization seeking a cost-effective and easily implementable WMS tool.

Pros
  1. iOS-friendly and cloud-native, uniquely designed for iOS interfaces, making it one of the few cloud-native WMS systems.
  2. Advanced capabilities for SMBs, including features like measuring picking metrics, surpassing expectations for its size.
  3. Advanced capabilities for process and batch manufacturing, offering support for lot attributes, bin attributes, and pallet attributes crucial for advanced slotting and cross-docking.
Cons
  1. Technology and compatibility issues with some devices require careful consideration of device compatibility.
  2. Reports of software bugs from some users, indicating potential stability concerns compared to larger vendors.
  3. Not suitable for enterprises, lacking the transaction processing capabilities required by larger organizations.

8. Logiwa WMS

Logiwa WMS is tailored for eCommerce and parcel-centric operations, excelling in various aspects of warehouse management, including WMS, WCS, and WES. While its capabilities are robust, they may not be as comprehensive as those offered by some other enterprise solutions featured on this list. Opt for Logiwa if you require a cloud-native, feature-rich WMS designed for mid-size warehouses with a focus on parcel-centric operations.

Pros
  1. Ideal for eCommerce and parcel-centric operations, making it particularly well-suited for businesses in these sectors.
  2. Feature-rich, offering advanced capabilities typically found in mid-size WMS systems, although not as advanced as some enterprise solutions.
  3. Cloud-native UI/UX, providing an intuitive interface and user experience. Encompasses capabilities across WMS, WCS, and WES, including integration with ASRS systems and AGVs.
Cons
  1. Learning curve, requiring users to adapt to the system, especially if they lack prior experience with WMS solutions.
  2. Not as user-friendly as simpler WMS systems like Mobe3, necessitating training and implementation efforts.
  3. Limited coverage for complex enterprise modes, primarily designed for parcel-centric operations, makes it less suitable for warehouses with diverse modes.

7. Softeon

Softeon caters to a customer base similar to Infor WMS, focusing on the upper mid-market segment. However, it lacks proven experience with enterprise customers compared to some other solutions on this list, and it might be too robust for smaller companies. 

Consider Softeon if you are a mid-sized organization in search of an advanced WMS that not only offers additional capabilities like distributed order management but also supports crucial batch processing required for larger warehouse operations.

Pros
  1. Robust batch capabilities, addressing the needs of mid-sized companies that have outgrown basic barcoding solutions.
  2. Seamless integration with other solutions included in the suite, streamlining the connectivity between different components like distributed order management.
  3. Distributed order management capabilities are beneficial for high-volume retail and distribution organizations managing complex transactions, including micro-fulfillment operations.
Cons
  1. Not tailored for enterprise-scale operations. lacking a proven track record with larger companies.
  2. Requires third-party add-ons for enterprises needing additional supply chain capabilities, making the suite less comprehensive than larger solutions like Blue Yonder or Manhattan.
  3. May be too intricate for very small operations, with layers supporting batch processing potentially overwhelming for companies with minimal scale.
+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

6. Infor WMS

Infor WMS is tailored for distributors in the upper mid-market segment, particularly prevalent in manufacturing industries, with a notable focus on verticals where solutions like Infor LN and M3 hold prominence. This is particularly applicable to sectors such as Automotive, Aerospace, Fashion, and Industrial distribution. If you are a mid-market manufacturer, especially considering or already utilizing Infor LN or M3 ERP systems, Infor WMS might be a suitable choice.

Pros
  1. Seamless integration with other Infor ERPs. Infor WMS offers pre-integrated solutions with Infor LN and M3, addressing the inherent challenges of ERP-WMS integration, especially for manufacturers already leveraging these ERP systems.
  2. Comprehensive supply chain capabilities. In addition to WMS, Infor WMS incorporates various supply chain offerings, including S&OP and visibility platforms, making it comparable to larger supply chain suites like Blue Yonder or Manhattan.
  3. 3D warehouse functionality. The unique 3D warehouse capability is particularly advantageous for larger warehouses, enhancing operational efficiencies through a virtual 3D layout.
Cons
  1. Limited suitability for large enterprises. While excelling in upper mid-market warehouses, Infor WMS might not be the optimal choice for high-volume warehouses with smaller dollar transactions.
  2. Weakness in TMS execution. The Transportation Management System (TMS) component is not as robust, necessitating the adoption of a best-of-breed TMS execution product to align with more robust suites like Blue Yonder.
  3. Suboptimal for 3PL. While possessing capabilities similar to SAP EWM, Infor WMS is not tailored for 3PL perspectives, lacking in-depth compliance, freight audit features, and dispatch and rate shopping functionalities typically essential for 3PL operations.

5. Oracle WMS

Oracle WMS is well-suited for expansive transactional warehouses seeking a dedicated supply chain layer to manage high transaction volumes, 24/7 operations, or the warehouse architecture of a 3PL business model. It is particularly advantageous for enterprises desiring comprehensive supply chain capabilities within a unified suite, especially if already integrated with Oracle Cloud ERP. If you are a large enterprise, particularly leveraging other Oracle products like ERP or RMS, Oracle WMS may be a suitable choice.

Pros
  1. Complete suite for a comprehensive tech stack. Oracle WMS integrates various supply chain capabilities, including RMS, S&OP, TMS, etc., offering a comparable feature set to other expansive suites like Blue Yonder and Manhattan.
  2. Pre-integration with other Oracle apps. Oracle WMS seamlessly integrates with other Oracle applications such as ERP and TMS, eliminating the need for expensive custom integration efforts, making it suitable for large enterprises.
  3. Proven for high transaction volumes. Oracle WMS has demonstrated its effectiveness in managing millions of transactions and large, busy warehouses and operations.
Cons
  1. Overwhelming for smaller companies. The data model and product design may pose challenges for smaller organizations, introducing additional steps and operational overhead.
  2. Dependency on add-ons for specific capabilities. Oracle lacks native capabilities for network, data, and maps, relying on partners to provide these features, limiting its execution capabilities.
  3. Expensive customization for compliance workflows. Implementing compliance workflows not pre-built into the core requires substantial development and consulting efforts, contributing to higher customization costs compared to other solutions.
+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

4. SAP EWM

SAP EWM caters to enterprise-grade warehouses and distribution companies, especially those with a 3PL business model, particularly when integrated with other SAP solutions like SAP S/4 HANA. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller warehouses operating on a limited consulting budget. Opt for SAP EWM if you are a large distribution company with a global presence, particularly leveraging other SAP products such as SAP S/4 HANA or SAP Hybris.

Pros
  1. Support for both decoupled and embedded architecture. This flexibility enables companies to facilitate 24/7 warehouse operations and accommodate the unique warehouse architecture demands of a 3PL business model, distinct from the financial representation in the ERP system.
  2. Power of HANA. Leveraging the robust capabilities of HANA, SAP EWM can efficiently handle the demanding workloads of Fortune 500 organizations, providing a competitive edge compared to solutions that might struggle with such volumes.
  3. Advanced capabilities for 3PL. SAP EWM offers features tailored for 3PL operations, including support for value-added services integral to the 3PL business model, and enhancing capabilities for billing and service offerings.
Cons
  1. Too big for smaller companies. The complex data model of SAP EWM may pose challenges for smaller organizations seeking streamlined systems without the overhead crucial for larger enterprises.
  2. Learning curve and expensive implementation. Implementing SAP EWM involves a significant learning curve and substantial implementation costs due to the system’s complexity.
  3. Expensive. In comparison to other solutions on this list, SAP EWM’s pricing may not be as accommodating for smaller organizations.

3. Korber/HighJump 

Korber/HighJump serves mid- to upper-mid-sized companies seeking an integrated suite, including last-mile capabilities. Although Korber/HighJump features various integrated components like TMS, DSD, and freight audit capabilities, it may not offer the same level of comprehensiveness as some other solutions on this list. Opt for Korber if you have graduated from standalone, smaller WMS systems and require a suite with advanced WMS capabilities tailored for mid-market companies.

Pros
  1. Fairly comprehensive suite for both WMS and TMS. Korber’s suite encompasses several pre-integrated components, providing advantages not found in smaller solutions like mobe3.
  2. Pre-integrated WMS and TMS. The pre-integrated WMS and TMS offered by Korber are particularly beneficial for mid-market companies, eliminating the need for extensive integration efforts required by standalone WMS and TMS systems.
  3. DSD capabilities. Korber addresses the needs of companies in the DSD space, offering specialized capabilities such as proof of delivery, in-house fleet management, and unique dispatch and scheduling features based on routing or priority.
Cons
  1. Issues with pre-baked integration. While Korber provides pre-baked integration, thorough vetting of integration flows based on specific requirements may be necessary. Custom integration might be required if existing flows prove insufficient for particular use cases.
  2. Not a complete Supply Chain suite. Compared to other suites on this list, Korber may lack some comprehensive capabilities, such as integrated S&OP and control tower features that are more expansive in other solutions.
  3. Not for enterprises. Unlike proven solutions such as Blue Yonder and Manhattan, Korber may not have as extensive experience with large accounts.

2. Blue Yonder

Blue Yonder boasts the strongest supply chain suite, coupled with advanced WMS capabilities, well-established in enterprises, particularly within high-volume retail companies. However, Blue Yonder may not be suitable for smaller businesses. Opt for Blue Yonder if you are a large enterprise, especially in the retail sector, seeking a comprehensive supply chain suite seamlessly integrated with a WMS.

Pros
  1. Enterprise-grade WMS with pre-built components. Blue Yonder stands out as a leading supply chain suite, validated through successful collaborations with Fortune 500 accounts.
  2. Ideal for retail-centric industries. Offering advanced capabilities tailored for retailers managing extensive SKU portfolios and multiple locations, Blue Yonder excels in location-level planning.
  3. Pre-integrated support for all supply chain modes. Blue Yonder provides comprehensive assistance across all supply chain modes, inclusive of a supply chain control tower with advanced AI and ML capabilities, enhancing the existing WMS features.
Cons
  1. Too large for SMBs. Blue Yonder’s extensive capabilities may be overwhelming for small and medium-sized businesses seeking simpler WMS solutions.
  2. Cost-prohibitive for SMBs. The expense associated with Blue Yonder may be deemed excessive by SMBs without enterprise-scale requirements.
  3. Lack of a network component in the supply chain suite. A notable drawback is Blue Yonder’s absence of an owned network. Solutions with an integrated network possess enhanced data control, enabling richer insights to augment WMS capabilities.

1. Manhattan Associates

Manhattan WMS stands as one of the most robust solutions in the market, particularly excelling in high-volume retail scenarios. While Manhattan may not offer the same comprehensiveness in its Supply Chain suite, it is exceptionally well-suited for large enterprises in the food, grocery, shoe, and apparel industries. However, it may not be the optimal choice for smaller businesses. Opt for Manhattan if you are a sizable company, particularly in the food, grocery, shoe, and apparel sectors, seeking a top-tier WMS solution.

Pros
  1. The suite includes a pre-integrated point of sale. Manhattan’s suite incorporates a pre-integrated point of sale, offering significant advantages for companies lacking internal IT capabilities for integration or unwilling to invest in costly integration processes.
  2. Capable of handling enterprise workloads. Proven with enterprise retailers dealing with extensive transaction volumes and SKU portfolios, Manhattan demonstrates proficiency in deep planning and merchandising capabilities.
  3. Effective management of complex verticals. Manhattan excels in handling unique requirements associated with inventory planning in verticals like grocery, shoes, and apparel, showcasing specialized WMS capabilities.
Cons
  1. Incomplete supply chain suite. Although Manhattan’s suite covers essential execution components such as WMS, TMS, OMS, and POS, it falls short in other supply chain pillars such as S&OP and network.
  2. Requires add-ons for comprehensive supply chain capabilities. Companies seeking a holistic suite experience may need multiple add-ons to match the capabilities of other Supply Chain suites like Blue Yonder.
  3. Not designed for SMBs. Tailored for enterprise companies, Manhattan’s design may not be as accommodating for smaller businesses seeking simpler solutions.

Conclusion

Selecting a WMS system can be challenging, given its intersection with various software categories and evolving packaging strategies. As technology progresses, the distinctions are becoming less clear, adding to the complexity.

For those seeking a new WMS system, a crucial step is understanding your business model and transactions and aligning them with suitable software with the help of independent WMS consultants. This list aims to offer a concise starting point for further evaluation.

FAQs

Top 5 Types of ERP Contracts

Top 5 Types of ERP Contracts

ERP contracts are not as straightforward. Depending upon the engagement structure (and different parties involved), the arrangements could vary, with serious implications on the outcome. These agreements include various elements, such as relationships and obligations of different parties involved, including licensing, pricing, implementation, support, and maintenance. They set the tone for your ERP initiatives.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Misunderstandings start with the misalignment in expectations. Even if different parties claim to be aligned, they might still arise because of the language used. The same keyword could mean different things in different contexts. For example, customers might expect ERP vendors to do the heavy lifting. However, vendors might expect their role to be just advisory due to the limited budget. Even if contracts might include detailed RACI charts, there might still be layers that might cause confusion and disagreements.

Moreover, customers struggle with ERP contracts due to their myopic focus on hourly rates, pricing, and discounts, and because of this, they lose sight of details. The problems with contracts are very similar to any complex project, especially with scheduling. Because customers underestimate the complexity and expertise required to read between the lines. This article will explore the top five types of ERP contracts, discussing their nuances, benefits, and potential drawbacks.



ERP Selection: The Ultimate Guide

This is an in-depth guide with over 80 pages and covers every topic as it pertains to ERP selection in sufficient detail to help you make an informed decision.

1. Software License, Implementation,  and Support on OEM Papers

In this ERP contract arrangement, you enter into multiple contracts directly with the software OEMs. In the ERP industry, the OEM would be software publishers such as SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. The software OEMs would not only provide the software and product support, but they would also use their professional services to help with implementation. These contracts are usually segregated into software, service, and support agreements, each serving a distinct purpose and carrying different legal obligations.

The software agreement encompasses an End User Licensing Agreement (EULA), which defines the terms and conditions for utilizing the ERP software and the accompanying IP rights. On the other hand, the services agreement focuses on the services related to implementing the ERP software. This typically includes information about the skills required, the methodology for implementing the software, project timelines, and the roles and responsibilities of both parties involved.

The support agreement specifies the support services provided for the ERP system. It often categorizes support into different tiers based on the severity of issues, sets timelines for issue resolution, and may define billing rates for additional services not covered by the initial support agreement. This agreement may also contain provisions related to warranties.

Key points to remember: OEMs are generally cautious in their consulting and support recommendations. The caution arises because any help or recommendations they provide in areas not explicitly defined in the contract may affect their obligations under the software agreement. By assuming too much risk in these areas, the software company may potentially jeopardize its software contract so they may be conservative in their approach.

2. Software Licenses on OEM Papers; Engagement with a Reseller

In this arrangement, the software contract is still with an OEM, but your primary engagement will likely be with a reseller. These resellers typically have access to the OEM’s quoting software and can provide a quote on official OEM documents.

In this arrangement, the OEM works in the background. They may not actively engage with the customer unless specific issues arise that may require their involvement, particularly if the customer’s relationship with the reseller becomes problematic. In such cases, the OEMs generally take over the reseller and might suggest switching to another reseller. In this arrangement, there are potential issues to consider:

  • Discounts and Costs: The discounts and costs associated with the ERP software may change based on new resellers’ tier status. 
  • Reseller Commissions: Switching to a different reseller might affect the commission structure, potentially leading to a loss of existing discounts or benefits.
  • Support Costs: If the company decides to switch back to the OEM for support, this may be more expensive than receiving support from the reseller.

Key points to remember: The support for the ERP software in this arrangement can vary. Sometimes, the software OEM may still provide support directly, or the reseller might handle the first level of support. The reseller will collaborate with the OEM if more advanced support is required. Implementation contracts with resellers are usually easier to switch unless the reseller has used proprietary intellectual property (IP) in the implementation. In such cases, changing resellers can be more challenging, as the new reseller or the OEM may not possess the specific industry-specific IP needed for the system to be useful for the customer.

3. Software Licenses on Reseller’s Papers 

In this arrangement, the software vendor (OEM) transfers the legal responsibility for the software to the reseller. This means that the reseller becomes primarily accountable for the software sales, support, and any legal issues that may arise. The relationship between the OEM and the reseller remains transactional, meaning the OEM would still transact with the reseller for each transaction rather than buying in bulk. The reseller earns a commission for each sale it makes. 

However, the OEM does not control (at least not directly) the final selling price the reseller offers to customers. The OEM provides the software to resellers at a wholesale price. This wholesale price is typically lower than what end customers pay. In this arrangement, the reseller can determine the final selling price to customers. 

Key points to remember: The legal responsibility for the software product is entirely shifted to the reseller. In other words, if any legal issues or disputes arise related to the software, the reseller is held accountable. The reseller is also responsible for providing customer support for the software. Customers may contact the reseller for assistance, and the reseller is expected to resolve any issues. Additionally, the reseller may be able to customize the software to meet industry-specific needs.  It’s common for resellers in this arrangement, especially those dealing with horizontal software platforms such as SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, or Microsoft, to have their own Intellectual Property (IP) that enhances the core software. This IP may provide industry-specific functionalities that cater to the unique needs of specific business sectors or verticals.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

4. Software Licenses Sold in an OEM Relationship by Software OEMs

This is a special arrangement with resellers and might be reserved only for certain territories/geographies or for very large resellers. In this arrangement, the resellers acquire licenses from their software publishers (or software OEMs) in an OEM arrangement. This agreement might be based on a volume purchase, which means the reseller commits to buying a large number of software licenses. 

In this scenario, the reseller could substantially change the software’s code, including selling under a completely new brand in a white-label arrangement. This can include customizing the software to meet specific needs, adding new features, or altering the software’s appearance. 

Key points to remember: In this situation, the reseller OEM primarily acts as the software platform provider. They focus on creating and maintaining the core software product. You might have limited or no direct interaction with the software OEM as a customer. Instead, your dealings would be mainly with the reseller OEM. Since you’re primarily dealing with the reseller OEM, you may not have access to the software OEM’s support and resources. If you encounter issues or need assistance, you typically contact the reseller OEM. If the reseller chooses to white-label the software, they may establish support and implementation services. This means they’ll provide customer support and help with the software’s deployment independently of the software OEM. They might have their dedicated support team and resources to assist you.

5. Software Licenses Sold in a Master Distributor Relationship

In this arrangement, the software OEMs may have several layers of master distributors with their respective channels to distribute the licenses. This arrangement is similar to the reseller OEM relationship in #4, where the software OEM will likely be least involved with the licensing and support. And for the most part, you are likely to deal with a master distributor

Key points to remember: This arrangement is especially common with companies selling hardware, but software vendors like Microsoft will likely have similar relationships even for their ERP channel. Due to the nesting of relationships and contractual dependencies, this is perhaps the most convoluted arrangement where understanding the roles and responsibilities of each party might be harder, even for ERP experts.

+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

Conclusion

Understanding the legal obligations of each party involved is essential for the project’s success. Otherwise, get ready to face the financial and legal surprises. These relationships and arrangements can challenge even the professionals tracking the space daily. So, don’t underestimate the expertise required to understand these contracts. Hire the advisors at least for negotiation before creating a million-dollar disaster by not fully understanding what you are signing up for.



ERP Selection Requirements Template

This resource provides the template that you need to capture the requirements of different functional areas, processes, and teams.

FAQs

Top 10 Non-Core Cross-functional ERP Business Processes

Top 10 Non-Core Cross-functional ERP Business Processes

The list of ERP business processes is endless and can seem overwhelming. However, not all these processes hold equal importance and can vary significantly depending on their interaction with the ERP system. While core processes tend to be consistent across most solutions, non-core ERP business processes vary considerably.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Various factors influence whether a business process qualifies as core or non-core. Typically, core processes are hosted within the ERP system, while non-core ERP business processes may often reside in external systems. For instance, the order-to-cash process is a classic example of a core ERP cross-function business process commonly integrated into the ERP system. Other processes like Dispatch-to-deliver and Issue-to-resolution demonstrate high levels of integration with ERP systems but may vary based on business models.

Cross-functional business processes can also undergo significant transformations depending on the industry they serve. For instance, the order-to-cash process for a manufacturing company can differ substantially from that of a transportation company, with the latter possibly residing in a Transportation Management System (TMS) rather than the ERP. Understanding these non-core ERP business processes is essential for making informed decisions about system selection and architecture, as the line between integrating them into the ERP or opting for a best-of-breed solution can be quite thin.



ERP Selection: The Ultimate Guide

This is an in-depth guide with over 80 pages and covers every topic as it pertains to ERP selection in sufficient detail to help you make an informed decision.

1. Dispatch-to-deliver

The dispatch-to-deliver business process initiates when a shipment is ready to dispatch from the facility. It involves several steps, like planning and coordinating various stages in the supply chain. It is to ultimately deliver goods to the customer and obtain their signature as proof of receipt. This business process primarily falls under the responsibility of the supply chain execution function

Typically, ERP systems do not include the dispatch-to-deliver process as an integral part of their functionalities. Instead, specialized systems like WMS(Warehouse Management System) or TMS(Transportation Management System) generally facilitate this process.

However, some systems available in the market offer an embedded experience for the entire dispatch-to-deliver process. Therefore, when deciding how to manage the dispatch-to-deliver process within your organization, you should consider transaction volume and architectural requirements. Depending on your specific needs, you can incorporate this process within your ERP system or introduce a dedicated WMS or TMS system into your architecture.

2. Hire-to-retire

The HR department primarily manages the hire-to-retire process. It begins with the recruitment of candidates, their onboarding, training, and monitoring of their job performance, and concludes with the necessary procedures when the company either terminates them or they leave voluntarily. 

In most cases, an HCM system facilitates this process. Generally, ERP systems do not have the functionality to host this process. However, there are instances when the hire-to-retire process interacts with ERP systems in industries where specific skills and certifications are integral to the operational processes. 

In such cases, ERP systems tailored for these industries may incorporate certain elements of the hire-to-retire process. This integration ensures that HR-related data, like employee skills and certifications, is seamlessly integrated into the broader ERP system, enabling better workforce management within the company’s overall operations.

3. Issue-to-resolution

The issue-to-resolution process is a fundamental customer service procedure that companies follow to address customer concerns and ensure the smooth functioning of their products or services. It typically commences when customers reach out with specific issues related to their equipment or services. Upon receiving the customer’s call or inquiry, service teams assess whether the equipment or service is still under warranty coverage as the first step. This can significantly impact the resolution process.

If the warranty covers the equipment or service, the service team provides the necessary services to rectify the issue. In cases where the warranty has expired or does not apply, the service team may initiate the process of issuing a purchase order for any required replacement parts or services. This process may sometimes involve physical visits to the customer’s location, especially if there is a need for on-site repairs or inspections.

Managing this process is essential for customer satisfaction and operational effectiveness for companies. They often host this process inside CRM or a best-of-breed field service system. Depending on their specific needs and preferences, some companies integrate this process with their ERP systems, initiating the flow with a service order or a GL entry. 

4. Lead-to-quote

The lead-to-quote process is integral to pre-sales and marketing automation workflows, primarily hosted within CRM systems. It commences by creating leads, which are potential customers, through various channels such as physical marketing campaigns or digital initiatives. 

These leads then move through the funnel using a series of interactions, which involves estimating the required services, if necessary, engaging in engineering activities to tailor offerings to the customer’s needs, and, finally, releasing the quote. 

It’s important to note that in most cases, this process remains within the confines of the CRM system and does not typically involve an ERP system. However, exceptions exist, particularly when engineering processes require access to product data or when configuring complex product quotations (CPQ), necessitating a connection to the ERP system.

5. Campaign-to-lead

The campaign-to-lead process is a fundamental aspect of marketing and sales operations within a business. It is a crucial precursor to the lead-to-quote process or can function as a subset. 

This process begins with the initial design of marketing campaigns, which can be either physical, such as print advertisements or billboards, or digital, including online ads and social media promotions. After campaign planning, the next step involves executing these marketing initiatives. Subsequently, it necessitates the measurement of campaign results to gauge their effectiveness.

A key component of the campaign-to-lead process is capturing potential customers’ interest and guiding them through the sales funnel until they convert into leads. It’s important to note that, in most cases, this process operates independently of the company’s ERP system. ERP systems typically come into play much later in the customer journey, mainly when leads are qualified and have the potential to translate into financial opportunities for the company.

+

ERP Optimization And Integration Architecture Development

Learn how Work Sharp fixed their broken ERP implementation that caused customer service issues and improved Supply Chain planning.

6. Contract-to-enroll

Companies involved in multiple enrollment campaigns commonly use the contact-to-enroll business process, particularly for subscription-based services like educational courses or paid events. This process guides potential participants from initial contact to successful enrollment.

It begins with identifying specific programs or offerings the organization wants to promote. Once they identify the programs, the next step involves crafting targeted marketing campaigns to generate interest among potential participants. The process also involves nurturing these prospects through a sales or enrollment funnel. This may include various stages, such as providing information, addressing queries, and guiding them to the enrollment step. 

These programs may be paid or unpaid depending on the organization’s objectives. It’s important to note that unless there is a specific requirement for integrating financial aspects into the organization’s ERP system, this contact-to-enroll process typically operates independently from the ERP, focusing solely on the enrollment journey of potential participants.

7. Expense-to-pay

Expense-to-pay is a crucial component within an organization’s time and expense workflow. In this process, an employee initiates the workflow by reporting expenses incurred during client visits, projects, or events. These expenses may include a wide range of items, such as travel costs, accommodation, meals, and other related expenditures. 

The primary goal is to accurately document, validate, and eventually pay or bill these expenses, depending on the specific circumstances. Depending on company policies, some expenses may need to be billed to clients for reimbursement, while others may be eligible for direct reimbursement to the employee. Additionally, organizations often need to oversee and control budgets associated with employee expenses, ensuring that expenditures remain within predefined limits. 

Employees who have received company credit cards to facilitate expense transactions manage these cards, including monitoring transactions and ensuring timely payments. Companies may host this complex process within a specialized T&E software or utilize the T&E module within their ERP system.

8. Recruit-to-hire

Recruit-to-hire is a fundamental process that lays the foundation for an organization’s workforce. It is a precursor to the hire-to-retire process. First, it all starts with creating job descriptions that outline the roles and responsibilities expected from potential candidates. Once these descriptions are in place, the process shifts towards identifying the most suitable channels for sourcing potential candidates. This could involve posting job listings on websites, utilizing recruitment agencies, or leveraging social networks.

Following candidate sourcing, a critical aspect of recruit-to-hire is conducting evaluations and interviews. This entails assessing candidates’ qualifications, skills, and cultural fit within the organization. Organizations often perform background checks to ensure the correctness of a candidate’s claims and protect the company’s interests.

Finally, once a candidate is selected, the recruit-to-hire process culminates with signing offer letters, solidifying the employment agreement. While it rarely touches ERP, companies often use various systems like Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) or Human Capital Management (HCM) software to streamline and manage these tasks efficiently.

9. Return-to-refund

The return-to-refund process is an integral component of the overall return procedure within a company. This process typically begins with the initiation of a return request by the customer. Once initiated, the company handles various steps, including processing the return, providing appropriate packaging and labels, and receiving the returned inventory

They perform a crucial quality check at this stage to ensure the returned items meet the necessary standards. Subsequently, the respective vendors might receive the inventory back, and they may manage the warranty process if applicable. Finally, the company issues the refund to the customer, thus concluding the transaction. 

To host the return-to-refund process, companies commonly integrate software systems, such as eCommerce platforms, POS systems, or ERP software. Moreover, the return process frequently interfaces with other essential systems, including WMS, OMS, and CRM tools. Within an ERP workflow, the process can start by directly capturing the return request within the ERP system or by interacting with it to process the necessary General Ledger (GL) entries.

+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

10. Market-to-order

Market-to-order is a comprehensive business process that serves as a superset of lead-to-quote and the precursor of order-to-cash. The process begins with formulating and maintaining a well-thought-out marketing plan, which includes strategies and tactics to reach the target audience effectively. Once the plan is in place, the next step is the design and execution of marketing campaigns, aligning them with the established budget.

Throughout the marketing campaigns, monitoring their performance and effectiveness is crucial, ensuring that they yield the desired results. As part of this process, leads are generated and captured. Managing these leads involves guiding them through the sales funnel, where they are nurtured and engaged until they reach the point of conversion into actual orders. This conversion marks a critical transition from marketing to the subsequent stages of the business cycle.

In most cases, Market-to-order operates independently of an ERP system. However, in some situations where quoting, estimation, and engineering processes are tightly integrated into the company’s operations, they might be hosted within the ERP system. Alternatively, if the quoting and estimation functions are part of the ERP, the integration may occur even earlier in the business cycle.

Conclusion

In conclusion, distinguishing between the core and non-core ERP business processes is necessary to navigate different business processes smoothly. The nuances of ERP systems and diverse industry requirements often complicate this task. While core processes are consistent and typically integrated within the ERP, non-core processes can exhibit a broader spectrum of possibilities, including integration with best-of-breed solutions or residing in external systems. Recognizing the distinctions and dependencies among these non-core processes is crucial for making informed decisions about system selection and architecture.

FAQs

Top 10 Core Cross-functional ERP Business Processes

Top 10 Core Cross-functional ERP Business Processes

ERP systems play an important role in streamlining the operations of a business. At the heart of these systems lie the core cross-functional business processes. Also, catering to the needs of different departments, these business processes are like building blocks for the organization to work smoothly. They include sequential activities across different departments to complete a financial or operational workflow. However, unlike ERP modules that you can choose individually, these core tightly integrated business processes rely on each other. In other words, implementing one process also entails addressing its underlying dependencies on other ERP business processes and modules.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Yet, the challenge many businesses face is understanding the significance of these core ERP processes. Without this essential knowledge, companies often encounter operational roadblocks and inefficiencies. Departments might function in isolation, lacking the interconnectedness needed for streamlined operations. This is why understanding these core cross-functional business processes is very important.

In this blog, we will talk about the top 10 core cross-functional business processes that bind different departments together.



ERP Selection: The Ultimate Guide

This is an in-depth guide with over 80 pages and covers every topic as it pertains to ERP selection in sufficient detail to help you make an informed decision.

1. Order-to-cash

The order-to-cash process is a complex business operation that includes various departments within an organization, such as sales, operations, and finance. From its initiation to the collection of payment, this process involves the entire lifecycle of a customer order. When a customer places an order, the process begins. Sales teams are responsible for capturing the order details, including product or service specifications, quantity, pricing, and customer information. 

Upon capturing an order and validating it, it moves to the operations department for processing. Operations personnel check inventory levels, product availability, and service delivery schedules if applicable. To fulfill the customer’s requirements, they also create picking lists, work orders, or service orders. This step in some industries, such as manufacturing or service-based businesses, ensures that the products or services meet the order specifications. After order fulfillment, the finance department generates an invoice based on the order details. Upon issuing the invoice, the finance team tracks and manages payments from the customer. 

Depending on the organization’s architectural boundaries, some companies host this process on one or multiple. Sometimes, the boundary of an ERP system may start from an invoice or GL. In other cases, the whole process happens within the ERP system. Therefore, when you choose an ERP system, define how much order-to-cash you would host inside the ERP. This will also help you find the right ERP system aligned with your business needs. 

2. Procure-to-pay

Managed within an ERP system, the procure-to-pay process is among significant cross-functional ERP business processes. Generally, this process encompasses several stages and involves different departments within an organization, including procurement, warehouse management, finance, and accounting. The process begins with the procurement department capturing a purchase order. 

Upon capturing the purchase order, the warehouse receives the inventory. After this, the finance department receives the vendor’s invoice, which includes the billing details for the delivered goods or services. Then, they would match an invoice against the corresponding purchase order and receipt information in the ERP system to ensure accuracy. The finance department initiates the payment process after the invoice is verified and approved. 

The degree of integration with the P2P process into a single ERP system can vary among organizations. Some may handle the entire process within the ERP, starting from the purchase order, while others might use additional specialized systems for certain steps, like procurement software for purchase order management.

3. Plan-to-produce/Plan-to-inventory

The plan-to-produce/plan-to-inventory business process is particularly relevant for industries that require accurate forecasting and planning of inventory before production. Commonly seen in consumer-centric and commoditized industries, the process begins with S&OP analyzing historical sales data, market trends, customer demand, and other relevant factors to forecast the demand for their products. 

After forecasting demand, the next step is supply planning. In this phase, companies determine how they will meet the anticipated demand. It involves assessing the available resources, production capacity, and procurement capabilities. Once the supply plan is in place, the procurement department comes into play. Their role is to source the necessary materials, components, and resources required for production. This might involve negotiating with suppliers, placing orders, and managing the procurement process efficiently to ensure that materials are available when needed for production. With the materials procured and the supply plan in hand, the production and manufacturing teams swing into action. To produce the goods in line with the forecasted demand, they use the production schedule generated during supply planning

Some companies might host the entire P2P process within their ERP system. In such cases, the ERP system handles everything from forecasting and planning to procurement and inventory management. However, others may use a separate S&OP system for initial demand forecasting and supply planning. In the latter case, the S&OP system feeds planned forecasts and supply plans into the ERP system to execute the production and inventory management processes.

4. Record-to-report

Primarily managed by the finance department within an organization, the record-to-report process is a critical business process. Its main purpose is to handle non-operational transactions accurately. In many organizations, ERP systems play a central role in managing financial data. However, ERPs may not offer automated recording of all financial transactions as some are non-operational and might require manual recording. The process begins with the finance department recording financial transactions. 

After recording transactions, finance professionals reconcile accounts. This step is crucial for ensuring that the recorded data is accurate and that there are no discrepancies or errors. Reconciliation involves comparing various financial records and ensuring they match. While the core of the record-to-report process resides within the finance department, it might require multiple systems to manage it. For example, they might use the ERP system to capture and initial transaction reconciliation. Still, they may transfer GL data to a separate FP&A software system. Before generating final financial reports, finance teams might sometimes consolidate data in the FP&A software. This step is essential for producing accurate reports, especially for larger organizations with multiple subsidiaries or divisions

The ultimate goal of the record-to-report process is to create financial reports. These reports provide a snapshot of an organization’s financial health and performance over a specific period, such as a month, quarter, or year. Before finalizing and distributing financial reports, finance professionals often analyze the data to identify trends, anomalies, and insights. The record-to-report process also plays a significant role in ensuring compliance with financial regulations and standards. Organizations may be subject to internal and external audits to verify the accuracy and legality of their financial statements.

5. Source-to-pay

The source-to-pay business process is one of the workflows within an ERP system that encompasses activities related to sourcing and procurement. Organizations follow a series of steps to effectively manage their procurement cycle, from identifying and building consensus on the need to identifying qualified vendors and finalizing payments. The process usually starts with identifying the organization’s need for certain goods or services.  

Post that, it often requires consensus-building within the organization among various stakeholders. This step ensures the procurement aligns with the organization’s goals and budgets. After obtaining internal consensus, the next step is to identify potential vendors or suppliers who can fulfill the requirements. Upon identifying potential vendors, the organization conducts a thorough vetting process to assess their capabilities, financial stability, and adherence to legal and ethical standards. This step helps in ensuring that selected vendors are trustworthy and capable. After vetting the vendors, the organization awards a contract to the selected vendor(s). This contract outlines the terms and conditions of the procurement, including pricing, delivery schedules, and quality standards. This step formalizes the relationship between the organization and the vendor. 

With the contract in place, the process proceeds with all the steps of the P2P process. Depending on the complexity of the sourcing phase, there might be several systems, and the ERP flow might start with a purchase order. The other companies might host RFQ comparisons, etc., inside the ERP.

+

Omnichannel ECommerce Customer Experience Transformation

Learn how fashion retailer AKIRA built a digital roadmap and managed stakeholder expectations to transform its processes and systems.

6. Idea-to-Offering

The idea-to-offering business process is essential to new product development within a company. This process involves multiple stages and activities, from marketing to operations, figuring out go-to-market fit before a product is ready for production. The process starts with extensive market research and analysis to understand the potential demand for the product. This includes studying customer needs, preferences, and market trends to refine the concept and make it more customer-centric. 

After gaining insights from customer research, the company begins the engineering phase. This involves designing and developing prototypes or mock-ups of the product to test its feasibility and functionality. In parallel with engineering, the company starts the procurement process. This involves sourcing the necessary materials, components, and resources for the product. Procurement also includes negotiations with suppliers for pricing and terms. The company works closely with its suppliers and partners during the design and sampling phase to ensure efficient manufacturing of products and meet quality standards. Simultaneously, the operations team strategizes the go-to-market plan. This involves deciding on pricing, distribution channels, marketing campaigns, and other factors essential for successfully launching the product. 

At this point, some companies may host this process in different systems. For instance, They might use a PLM system for program and idea management, CAD/PDM tools for engineering, and P2P systems for vendor collaboration. When all preparations are in place, the ERP system takes over. With the product now in the ERP system, production can begin. Some companies may host the entire idea-to-offering process within their ERP system, consolidating all stages and data into a single integrated platform for more streamlined management and control. 

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

7. Count-to-reconcile

The count-to-reconcile among ERP business processes is an integral part of managing inventory within an ERP system if it is the main source of truth for inventory. It’s a systematic procedure that usually begins with the planning phase for inventory reconciliation. This involves deciding how often inventory counts will occur (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly) and which inventory items, warehouses, or locations will be included in the counting process. To prioritize inventory counting efforts, items are often categorized into different classes based on their value, criticality, or other relevant factors. The ABC classification system typically consists of: A-Class: High-value or critical items, B-Class: Moderately valuable items, and C-Class: Low-value or less critical items. 

Once the items are categorized, specific items, warehouses, or locations are identified for counting based on the inventory reconciliation plan. A pick list is generated to guide the counting process. Depending on the organization’s technology and preferences, the counting can be done using handheld devices. Discrepancies between the physical count and the ERP records are inevitable. If found, adjustments are made. Once all items have been counted, adjustments are posted. It reconciles any discrepancies identified during the counting process. 

Depending on the organization’s technology landscape, inventory and location information might be stored in various systems like WMS, eCommerce platforms, or OMS. In many cases, the ERP system is the central source of truth for inventory management. This means that all inventory-related information and adjustments are primarily handled within the ERP. Therefore, the Count-to-Reconcile process plays a critical role in maintaining the accuracy of inventory data within the ERP system.

8. Forecast-to-monitor

The forecast-to-monitor business process plays a significant role in the budgeting and financial management of an organization. It involves a series of steps designed to ensure that an organization effectively plans, tracks, and manages the budget of each account and department. The process begins with planning various financial scenarios. 

Once done, historical trends for each account are analyzed to create accurate budgets. This involves looking at past financial data, such as revenue growth, cost patterns, and other relevant financial metrics. The key aspect of this business process is collaboration. Teams from various departments within the organization need to work together to develop a comprehensive budget. Each department will have its budgetary requirements and contributions to the overall budget. Collaboration ensures that all stakeholders’ input is considered in the budgeting process. After considering different scenarios, analyzing historical trends, and collaborating with teams, the organization sets its budget for the upcoming year. Once the budget is set, it’s crucial to monitor and manage it throughout the year continuously. 

Depending on the complexity of the budgeting process and the data requirements, organizations may choose to manage this process within their FP&A department or directly inside their ERP system. If they opt to use the ERP, it typically involves entering budgeted numbers into the ERP system to track yearly performance.

9. Inspect-to-comply

The inspect-to-comply business process is part of the quality management process. The workflow usually begins with the creation of a detailed test plan. This plan outlines the specific quality criteria and standards that need to be met for the product or material being tested. It specifies what aspects will be inspected, which tests will be conducted, and the testing methods to be used. 

Once the plan is in place, the next step is to identify the test cases. Test cases are specific scenarios or conditions that are designed to evaluate the quality of the product or material. These test cases are based on the requirements outlined in the test plan. After identifying the test cases, the next step involves identifying and selecting inventory items that need to go through the quality inspection process. Once the inventory items are identified, the next step is to execute the test steps according to the predefined test cases. During the execution of test steps, all relevant data and test results are recorded and documented. In some cases, materials may not meet the quality standards initially. When this happens, a material review process is initiated. 

Finally, the process involves preparing all necessary documentation to ensure compliance with quality standards and regulations. This documentation may include test reports, certificates of compliance, and other records that demonstrate that the items have met the required quality criteria. Depending on the organization’s setup, the quality management processes can be integrated into their ERP system, typically in a dedicated quality module. Alternatively, some organizations may use external quality management software that works in conjunction with their ERP system to handle these ERP business processes efficiently.

10. Cradle-to-grave/Acquire-to-retire

The cradle-to-grave/acquire-to-retire process is a significant approach to managing an organization’s entire lifecycle of assets. This process includes several stages, from the initial acquisition of assets to their eventual retirement. It usually begins with the acquisition of new assets within an organization. During acquisition, the organization typically creates purchase orders, negotiates contracts, and records the financial transactions related to the asset procurement. 

After acquisition, the assets are integrated into the organization’s financial system, often within an ERP system. The financial process among ERP business processes includes recording the asset’s value, computing the depreciation lifecycle, and accounting for related expenses such as maintenance, insurance, or licensing fees. This often leads to the steps of generating reports and retirement of assets. Reporting is crucial to monitor asset performance, maintenance costs, and compliance with accounting standards. As assets reach the end of their useful life or become obsolete, they are retired from active use. 

Depending on the organization’s industry and the complexity of asset management, the entire process may be handled within a single ERP system. Alternatively, some companies may use a combination of systems, with the ERP managing financial aspects and Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) or Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) handling maintenance and operational aspects.

+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

Conclusion

To summarize, the top 10 core cross-functional ERP business processes are essential components that help organizations operate efficiently. These processes connect different departments of a company and are vital for various tasks, from managing customer orders to handling procurement, forecasting demand, maintaining financial records, sourcing, and developing new products.

Understanding and improving these ERP business processes is not optional; it’s perhaps the first step for organizational integration and finding synergies across departments. These processes align departments in how they will be processing transactions and what will be their roles and responsibilities in facilitating that. Whether fully integrated into ERP systems or supported by other software, these processes are fundamental to improving efficiency and effectiveness in diverse industries.

FAQs

Top 6 Components of Organizational Readiness for ERP Implementation

Top 6 Components of Organizational Readiness for ERP Implementation

One misunderstanding that is prevalent among business owners is a simplified view of business transformation: choose a technology and implement it. How hard could it be? Well, as long as you know which technology will produce tangible business results. Most importantly, how to get there. But let’s not get too far, as most companies struggle to agree on the definition of ERP. They might not appreciate the value of organizational readiness for ERP implementation.

Let’s look at it from another perspective. Most people talk about ERP implementation failure, but they rarely have a good handle on the root cause. It’s most certainly not what they think it is, as projects fail before they even start. They fail because of the misalignment in the expectations. The misalignment could stem right inside executives’ heads. They might have different expectations from the system, completely off from the ground reality. They might struggle to articulate their thoughts to the extent that they might feel overwhelmed and confused. This is where a well-defined roadmap and blueprint could streamline the thought process and build consensus among teams.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Yet another perspective is related to everyone’s estimation of their own capabilities. Let’s face it. Most of us like to overclaim our capabilities because we have a tendency to figure things out given enough time. Unfortunately, this tendency leads to a snowball effect with the consequences as severe as the ERP project not even being recoverable. Going through the formal processes aligns expectations and removes these barriers, helping them understand why they need to think through their decisions. Organizational readiness is very similar to therapy sessions for the entire team and comprises the following six fundamental components:

1. Strategic and Executive Alignment

The problem starts at the top. Most business transformation initiatives, such as ERP implementation, require business model changes. Unfortunately, these business model changes are not as simple as moving a warehouse from one location to another. Instead, they are like performing heart surgery for the business. The issues are especially challenging as the business model changes would be nearly impossible with the amount of disruption they may cause. For this reason, most executives end up choosing the path of solving them technically just because they can’t visualize the technical implications as well as they do the consequences with physical processes.

Getting everyone on the same page about how the transformation initiative will change the business is significant. It should start with your leadership crafting a goal statement that may include the business value of the transformation initiative and forecasting potential changes required to make the initiative successful. You might want to ask questions such as:

  • Does your organization have clear expectations on the outcome of business transformation?
  • What objections are you likely to get in making business process and model changes?
  • Does the executive team have the necessary skills and experience to be able to foresee financial and technical risks because of these initiatives?
  • How is your current compensation structure, and how might that influence political forces among different functions and business units?

Communicating these strategies is a big part of aligning with the organization’s business model. Just like therapy, you need to have different strategies depending upon the needs of each stakeholder, with several tools and workshops tailored to their needs until they internalize the process and feel mentally conditioned to go through such a rigorous routine.

2. Operational Readiness

Mental conditioning is just the start. Operational readiness is like a physical sketch of your entire journey, where you are today and where you are headed. The process starts with getting the mental models on a piece of paper. So they can see where everyone’s heads are. It also requires developing a common language for every term that is likely to throw off the model. It’s almost like developing a language, or their mental state is likely to be far off from the ground reality. 

Once you have the common language built, it’s much easier for everyone to visualize the to-be state and why the changes requested are pivotal for the success of the program. The concept of operational readiness revolves around preparing specific functions and business processes for the change. It aims to answer questions that pinpoint the practical aspects of readiness. You might ask questions such as:

  • Does your team understand the current processes? Do they understand it well enough to draw them on a piece of paper?
  • Do your stakeholders have different versions of the same process in their heads?
  • Which business processes would require re-engineering that would streamline the technical implementation? 
  • Can business processes be re-engineered without causing major disruptions to the core operations? 
  • How would the changed business processes be rolled out? 

The physical sketches substantiate the mental models and help build consensus on the operational state both today as well as in the future. Bringing technology earlier in the conversations generally leads to biased conversations about technology and stakeholders jumping to conclusions without fully understanding the consequences.



ERP Selection: The Ultimate Guide

This is an in-depth guide with over 80 pages and covers every topic as it pertains to ERP selection in sufficient detail to help you make an informed decision.

3. Data Readiness

One factor among organizational readiness components often overlooked is data readiness. In general, the role of data in the context of systems is to take a piece of connected information from one step to the next. However, not many people realize how data and ERP work together. The absence of data readiness can drive process over-engineering and, in turn, can lead to system bloatedness. 

There are several reasons why companies delay this step to the point where it’s too late. First, while most business consultants might understand process state, data issues require deep implementation experience. Also, during the selection and strategy phase, it’s much harder to visualize the data hierarchy without access to a system to be able to see and feel the changes. So, the data issues tend to get postponed to the implementation phase. But once the contract is signed and if the data model is too off, it can throw off the entire implementation. The questions you should ask related to data re-engineering are as follows:

  • How is your current master data modeled? Have you done any customizations to your processes because of data issues?
  • Have you had multiple disconnected instances of master data records in the system?
  • Do you have data governance issues where the model does not seem to follow any logical structure?


An information model is very similar to a mental model, with the only exception that this state lives in your system’s head. If you overcomplicate the way you register information or don’t simplify, your system might not only experience “brain farts, ” but it might overcomplicate everything else that touches it.

4. People Readiness

Wherever there are people, there will be problems. Several factors drive people-related issues. It could be behaviors influenced by your current compensation structure or power struggle. These behaviors lead to “passive-aggressive” responses to issues without being explicit about them. People readiness among organizational readiness components requires a deep understanding of current behaviors and how that may impact their willingness to change business models or business processes critical for the success of business transformation initiatives. This can be even more challenging if the teams don’t have the right skills. Even small data and process changes might require corporate alignment and intervention from influential stakeholders. 

The biggest challenge with these initiatives is that they are harder to visualize, with the implications challenging to internalize unless you’ve been through these cycles multiple times before. Most people find it easier to trust complex concepts that they’ve seen work firsthand. The questions around people readiness you should be asking are as follows:

  • Are you currently experiencing a power struggle in the organization, and if so, do you deeply understand what may be influencing that?
  • What does decision-making feel like for cross-functional issues? Do you feel tension with conversations and that people are not willing to open up for underlying issues?
  • Do you feel that specific executives have a need for control and that other executives might not open up as easily when they might be around?

People issues are very similar to a board of a company. And unless you have a team that works together really well and trusts others around them to be able to share their feelings, you might require help with people readiness before you undertake your business transformation initiatives. 

5. Technical Readiness

While businesses overemphasize the importance of business and process re-engineering, technical readiness is just as important. It’s an alignment of business users’ and technical teams’ mental models. Both of these teams care for different things, and their heads are wired differently. So, this alignment is even more critical. The technical teams must understand the business vision and must be involved in making critical implementation and change decisions. With them running in trenches, they can see potential financial and technical risks that businesses might ignore. They might code and configure things not aligned with the business vision. 

Most companies take exactly the opposite approach with technical teams. They don’t involve them during the decision-making process, and then when things go south, they are the first ones to get blamed. Technical issues will always require business model changes, and if their voices are not incorporated in the decision-making, there will always be issues, especially if the business teams have a limited technical background. Also, even business executives who might claim to be technical experts rely on technical teams to make decisions for them. Here are the questions you should ask related to technical readiness:

  • How are your technical teams? Do they seem to overstate their capabilities? 
  • Do they seem to always solve problems through programming?
  • Do you have any proprietary systems? How about documented architecture along with process and information models?
  • Do you have access to enterprise-wide master data governance and reconciliation flows?

To guide this process, having a detailed technical plan is very helpful. This plan helps the technical teams code and configure things aligned with the business vision. 

Top 15 Digital Transformation Trends - Download

6. Project Governance and Planning

After you have the state of your initiatives defined from all perspectives, the next step is to plan how to execute them. System integrators and OEMs generally expect their clients to do 90% of the heavy lifting. There are several factors that drive this behavior. First, the client has unreasonable expectations but limited budgets. So, they leave vendors with no choice but to commit only to a fraction of the work. Second, their software might get blamed because of their involvement or recommendations with data or processes. Finally, the OEMs mandate prescriptive methodologies to their clients and resellers. Equally challenging is managing schedules with ERP projects because of the unavailability of key resources, especially part-time ones.

Project planning involves more than just digital processes. It also means figuring out how physical processes will change and how you’ll communicate these changes to everyone inside and outside your organization. This plan should include a roll-out strategy for introducing these changes in a way that makes sense technically and financially. It should also have KPIs that can help you stay on track. 

It’s not just about making schedules; it’s about organizing resources, communicating well, and ensuring your plan matches what’s happening. As you get ready for this big change, remember that careful planning and smart management are the keys to making your ERP system work well for you.

Conclusion

Each of these perspectives is equally critical. They’re like puzzle pieces that fit together to create a complete picture. Giving too much importance to the technology part and ignoring the people and process parts can cause problems. The technology might not work well with how your team works, making it hard for them to use it properly.

On the other hand, if you don’t pay enough attention to the technical side, you might face technical issues, and the system might not work as it should. Neglecting the organizational readiness and cultural side can result in resistance to changes and difficulty managing the transition.

Success comes from finding the right balance between these different viewpoints. Remember that all six components are important when assessing organizational readiness for ERP implementation. By understanding and considering each part properly, you’ll be on the right track to making your ERP project successful.

FAQs

FREE RESOURCE

2025 Digital Transformation Report

This digital transformation report summarizes our annual research on ERP and digital transformation trends and forecasts for the year 2025. 

Send this to a friend