ERP Archives - Page 6 of 14 - Independent ERP Consultants | Digital Transformation Experts

Top 10 Discrete Manufacturing ERP Systems In 2024

Leave a Comment / Aerospace & Defense, Automotive, Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP, Industrial Manufacturing / By Sam Gupta / July 3, 2024 July 14, 2024

Discrete Manufacturing Companies. Producing distinct items manufactured through a series of assembly processes, where individual components are combined to create the final product, discrete manufacturing typically involves BOMs, assembly lines, and detailed production schedules. The process results in tangible, countable products that can be individually tracked and managed through the supply chain. This type of manufacturing contrasts with process manufacturing, which produces goods in bulk, like chemicals or beverages, where the end products are not discrete items but rather homogeneous outputs.

Discrete Manufacturing Processes. It involves the production of distinct, countable items through a series of assembly and fabrication steps. These processes include assembling components, machining, welding, and quality testing, often organized along assembly lines. Each step in the process is distinct and can be tracked individually, with a focus on precision and customization. This approach is commonly used in industries like automotive, aerospace, electronics, and machinery.

Top 10 Discrete Manufacturing ERP Systems In 2024

Discrete Manufacturing ERP Needs. Modules for managing production planning, inventory control, and supply chain coordination are of utmost importance in this case. These systems must support detailed tracking of parts and components, facilitate efficient scheduling and resource allocation, and provide real-time visibility into production processes. Additionally, they require strong capabilities in quality management, engineering change control, and compliance tracking to handle the complexities of producing distinct items. Integration with CAD systems, advanced analytics for performance monitoring, and flexible reporting tools are also essential to address the unique demands of discrete manufacturing. So, which are the leading discrete manufacturing ERP systems for 2024?

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

Criteria

Definition of a discrete manufacturing company. These companies in the discrete manufacturing ecosystem include manufacturers that follow discrete manufacturing processes producing products in industries such as Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial, and Machinery. From the manufacturing mode types, they could belong to any of the categories such as make-to-order, make-to-stock, engineer-to-order, or project manufacturing. The list considers companies of all sizes in this ecosystem.
Overall market share/# of customers. The higher marketshare among discrete manufacturing companies drives higher rankings on this list.
Ownership/funding. The superior financial position of the ERP vendor leads to higher rankings on this list.
Quality of development. How modern is the tech stack? How aggressively is the ERP vendor pushing cloud-native functionality for this product? Is the roadmap officially announced? Or uncertain?
Community/Ecosystem. How vibrant is the community? Social media groups? In-person user groups? Forums?
Depth of native functionality. Last-mile functionality for specific industries natively built into the product?
Quality of publicly available product documentation. How well-documented is the product? Is the documentation available publicly? How updated is the demo content available on YouTube?
Product share and documented commitment. Is the product share reported separately in financial statements if the ERP vendor is public?
Ability to natively support diversified business models. How diverse is the product in supporting multiple business models in the same product?
Acquisition strategy aligned with the product: Any recent acquisitions to fill a specific hole for discrete manufacturing industries? Any official announcements to integrate recently acquired capabilities?
User Reviews: How specific are the reviews about this product’s capabilities? How recent and frequent are the reviews?
Must be an ERP product: Edge products such as HCM, CRM, eCommerce, MES, or accounting solutions that are not fully integrated to support enterprise-wide capabilities are not qualified for this list.

10. Plex

Adopting an MES-first strategy, Plex targets companies in the Toyota and Ford automotive ecosystems. Despite superior technology compared to other solutions on this list, Plex has fewer installs, primarily focusing on the automotive industry. Uniquely, Plex integrates some of the HCM processes tightly with MES and ERP, which is beneficial for automotive companies if skillsets and certifications are key inputs for production scheduling. However, its relevance may vary for other industries. Given its pros and cons, it maintains the #10 spot among the top 10 discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

MES-first approach. Plex excels with its MES-first architecture, which is particularly strong for shop-floor heavy industries.
Stronger automotive last-mile compliance capabilities. Plex offers deep last-mile and compliance capabilities for automotive companies and other MES-intensive industries.
Cloud-native. Plex’s technology is superior due to its cloud-native origins, setting it apart from other systems.

Weaknesses

Weaker ERP layers. Plex’s ERP capabilities and integration layers are not as robust, leading to potential challenges in adapting to various business transactions and models.
Not as scalable for diverse business models. The ERP may face difficulties scaling to accommodate different business models, affecting its flexibility.
Limited ecosystem and consulting base. Being more prescriptive, Plex has a weaker ecosystem and consulting base compared to other ERP solutions.

9. DELMIAWorks

DELMIAWorks has performed really well from an industry perspective, particularly in more process-centric sectors such as plastics. Industries related to plastics, especially from a discrete perspective, will benefit significantly from DELMIAWorks. Additionally, it has a tighter alignment with the CAD system SolidWorks. Industries using SolidWorks will experience richer capabilities and superior alignment from a product capabilities perspective. Therefore, the industries to consider for DELMIAWorks include automotive and aerospace, especially if they are slightly more plastic-centric within those verticals. This contributes to the placement of this product at #9 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Seamless integration with other tools in SolidWorks portfolio. Their alignment with the CAD system SolidWorks is particularly noteworthy. Industries utilizing SolidWorks can expect seamless integration and superior alignment.
Discrete and process manufacturing capabilities. Ideal for industries, that primarily focus on discrete manufacturing, but may also incorporate process manufacturing lines. This scenario is common in packaging-centric or medical device-centric industries.
Supply chain best-of-breed solutions as part of the suite. The suite comes fully equipped, pre-baked, pre-configured, and pre-integrated, saving you the hassle of investing heavily in these aspects as required by other solutions. These capabilities are typically sourced from third-party providers.

Weaknesses

Legacy technology. The technology is not as cutting-edge. They haven’t invested as heavily as some of their competitors in modernizing their systems. Even vendors who entered the field later have announced plans to upgrade to cloud-native technology stacks, a move that DELMIAWorks has not yet made. As a result, their technology remains somewhat outdated and legacy-like.
Not as scalable for all discrete industries. The scalability of DELMIAWorks may not be suitable for all discrete industries, particularly if your business model is complex. In such cases, where there are multiple layers across various industries, you might encounter challenges.
Limited ecosystem and consulting base. The consulting base and ecosystem for DELMIAWorks are comparable to Plex, with limitations due to the nature of the prescriptive category they belong to.

8. QAD

QAD targets mid-to-large discrete manufacturing companies such as automotive, electronics, and life sciences companies with a depth in the supply chain. It’s especially suitable for discrete companies that require deep layers of collaboration with their vendors for forecasting and planning. It excels in commoditized, consumer-centric products. These industries are strong from a supply chain planning perspective, and QAD offers superior capabilities as part of its suite. This is because, for these industries, supply chain capabilities are highly intertwined. But it’s not a fit for companies with diverse business models or very small companies. QAD has seen substantial advancements in its portfolio, especially with its technology, which was a massive barrier for QAD in the past. Thus, contributing to the placement of this product at #8 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Supply chain suite + ERP as part of the suite. QAD excels in offering superior capabilities within its suite, especially in terms of supply chain and ERP functionalities. This is particularly advantageous for discrete industries like automotive, where these capabilities are deeply interconnected and essential components of the suite.
Discrete companies with process manufacturing lines or components. Quite similar to those of DELMIAWorks. Both solutions offer integrated discrete and process manufacturing capabilities within their suites. However, the specific focus and target industries of QAD differ from those of DELMIAWorks. Also, the manufacturing processes they cater to and the industries they serve have distinct differences.
Global capabilities. QAD also has strong global capabilities. If your company requires processes such as in-depth collaboration, which is very common in supply chain companies, then QAD is a great fit.

Weaknesses

New technology might not be stable or rolled out to all modules. Even though they have announced that they are upgrading their technology, it might take a few years before this version becomes stable. Initially, there will be some modules that may not be fully developed. These incomplete modules could pose challenges during ERP implementation.
Ecosystem. The ecosystem or consulting support will not be as strong because this is a slightly more prescriptive category.
Not as diverse. This is not a good fit for companies with hybrid business models as the data and process model is highly tailored for specific discrete verticals.

7. Oracle Cloud ERP

Geared toward large discrete manufacturing firms with 10+ global locations (over $1B in revenue), Oracle Cloud ERP excels with high transaction volumes. Ideal for companies prioritizing financial functionality over plant-level needs or preferring plant-level integration with best-of-breed solutions. It is not the optimal choice for SMB discrete manufacturers lacking internal IT capabilities seeking full-suite capabilities. Oracle Cloud ERP is also ideal for global companies with diverse business model that plan to use multiple ERP systems at the plant level and use Oracle Cloud ERP as their corporate ERP system. Thus, contributing to the placement of this product at #7 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

ERP layers for complex organizations. This ERP system is designed for large global publicly traded companies. These companies typically require international financial consolidation and aim to integrate various business models and geographies into one solution. This is necessary to ensure end-to-end traceability.
Diversity of the solution supports most discrete industries. The ERP layers are highly adaptable and designed to support various business models, resulting in a very diverse product. In contrast, other products may not offer the same level of diversity.
Global compliance and localization. They will be supported in many different countries, whereas prescriptive solutions may not have such extensive support.

Weaknesses

Last mile capabilities through third-party vendors. The last mile capabilities, especially the suite integration will often come through third-party vendors. This introduces vendor risk, as these third parties may not always be as well-audited or documented.
Expensive implementation. In general, the implementation tends to be more expensive due to the involvement of multiple vendors. You also have to manage several different integrations, which might be pre-baked in other systems. Since this is a larger product, it will require significantly more time to implement.
Requires a mature internal IT team. In tailoring, customizing, and configuring these capabilities, the same capabilities that are already included as part of the suite, Oracle Cloud ERP also requires a very mature internal IT team.

6. Acumatica

Acumatica is a better fit for smaller discrete manufacturing companies, primarily located in countries such as the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia. These companies often require deeper operational capabilities and may not prioritize financial consolidation. It is acceptable to keep different countries in separate instances, as there may not be significant operational or financial synergies between these companies. With limited global operational capabilities, it may not be ideal for those seeking shared services or global synergies. Nevertheless, smaller discrete manufacturing startups valuing a superior user experience would find Acumatica appealing. Thus, contributing to the placement of this product at #6 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Discrete companies requiring CPQ and field services capabilities. It can accommodate several different business models—field service, distribution, manufacturing, and construction—all within the same product and database. This allows for far greater traceability among these business processes, eliminating the need for them to be siloed from an overall capabilities perspective.
Technology. The technology is superior to some of the legacy products especially when discrete companies might care for capabilities such as enterprise search or mobility.
Ideal for seasonal discrete companies. It would also be a great fit for seasonal companies because of consumption-based pricing. For example, school supply manufacturing business, or construction, manufacturing businesses, etc.

Weaknesses

Not native process manufacturing. The solution lacks native support for process manufacturing capabilities for discrete companies with hybrid business models. Although third-party add-ons are available, it can introduce the challenge of dealing with different vendors and their associated legal and technical risks.
Not a native quality module. They lack a quality module owned by Acumatica, meaning you’ll need to rely on another add-on vendor to address this gap.
Limited global consolidation capabilities. Acumatica has limited global capabilities for discrete companies seeking synergies among global entities.

5. SAP S/4 HANA

SAP S/4 HANA has a positioning very similar to Oracle Cloud ERP. It is a slightly larger product designed for global financial consolidation, accommodating many different business models and processes within the same solution. When end-to-end traceability is required, but industry-specific capabilities are not a priority, SAP S/4 HANA is a better fit. It may not suitable SMB manufacturing companies without internal IT maturity. Thus, positioning itself at #5 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

ERP layers for complex organizations. The ERP layers are ideal for complex organizations, along with best-of-breed products like SuccessFactors or EWM. However, these solutions may not offer a tailored experience for specific industries. To achieve this, you will either need to customize the system or integrate additional add-ons.
Diversity of the solution supports most discrete industries. The diversity of the solution allows you to support many different business models, although tailored capabilities for specific discrete verticals might not be as detailed.
Global compliance and localization. The global compliance and localization capabilities of SAP S/4HANA are very similar to Oracle Cloud ERP.

Weaknesses

Last mile capabilities through third-party vendors. The last mile or discrete-specific capabilities you acquire will be through third-party vendors. This approach increases vendor risk when utilizing these capabilities.
Expensive implementations. The implementation is going to be slightly more expensive with SAP S/4 HANA just because the solution is large and designed to be highly scalable, requiring increased implementation efforts.
Requires a mature internal IT team. SAP S/4 HANA also requires a very mature internal IT team to tailor, customize, and configure these capabilities.

4. Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O

With a very similar positioning to Oracle Cloud ERP or SAP HANA, Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O is slightly more generalized and comparatively smaller in size. It may not be as proven with Fortune 500 workloads, as well as its extensive approval layers and organizational structures might not be as relevant for mid-market companies. With slightly superior cloud capabilities, it has an ecosystem that makes it suitable for private equity and holding companies aiming to streamline their portfolio companies on one solution. SMBs, however, might find its complex data model overwhelming. Thus, resulting in the placement of the product at the #4 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Comprehensive localization across the globe. This would be beneficial for global discrete companies seeking synergies among their entities.
Ecosystem. One of the most active ecosystems, offering numerous solutions to support various industries, even if those capabilities aren’t part of the core ERP layers or products.
Development platform and Azure. It is also slightly more customizable just because of the development platform and the layers you have exposed for the customization.

Weaknesses

Last mile capabilities through third-party vendors. The last mile or industry-specific capabilities you acquire will be through third-party vendors. This approach increases vendor risk when utilizing these capabilities.
Expensive implementation. The implementation may be slightly more expensive because you’re dealing with many different vendors and many different add-ons.
Requires mature internal IT teams. Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O also requires a mature internal IT team to tailor, customize, and configure these capabilities.

3. Infor CloudSuite Industrial (Syteline)

Infor CloudSuite Industrial (Syteline) is the SMB product from Infor. It’s designed for companies with engineer-heavy discrete manufacturing without mandating formal engineering processes, such as requiring revision numbers or strict change control. If your organization has more flexible engineering processes, you will find Infor CloudSuite Industrial much more enjoyable. While possessing hybrid manufacturing features, it falls short in global trade compliance and lacks support for manufacturers heavily involved in distribution-centric processes. Thus, grabbing its #3 spot in our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Engineering-friendly for BOMs and costing. It’s designed for engineering-driven companies that have fluid engineering processes instead of formal processes. From the CSI perspective, the BOMs are complex manufacturing friendly, as the layers are far deeper and scalable compared to the other products.
Embedded field services process. This would be helpful for discrete companies with field service-centric business models where field service processes need to overlap with production processes such as scheduling.
Embedded quality processes. This would be beneficial for companies aiming to centralize their quality processes across all touch points including inbound, outbound, and in-process.

Weaknesses

WBS-centric discrete processes. Not a better fit for discrete companies with project-centric operations, even though CSI has some project manufacturing capabilities.
Not friendly for industries with complex inventories such as metal or medical devices. The core model includes attributes only for reporting and doesn’t account for them as part of core transactions such as planning, and scheduling.
Legacy technology. The interface of Infor CloudSuite Industrial (Syteline) is still very legacy and generally, users report a steep learning curve with CSI.

2. Epicor Kinetic

Epicor Kinetic targets small-to-mid-size discrete manufacturers specializing in industries with formal engineering processes and complex inventory needs, such as automotive, aerospace, metal fabrication, and medical devices. It is equally adept at handling project-centric operations and distribution processes for discrete manufacturers with hybrid business models. However, despite recent developments, Epicor Kinetic might not be the best fit for companies with global financial operations and extensive field service operations. Thus, acquiring #2 spot on our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Complex inventory. For example, medical devices and automotive, all of these industries require attributes as part of the product model, which are not only used for reporting but also mission-critical capabilities such as scheduling.
Friendly for discrete companies heavy on distribution. Distribution-centric planning is included as part of the product. Ideal for companies with a business model that includes manufacturing plus distribution processes.
Formal engineering governance. Industries such as aerospace that are very rigid about change control and revision numbers can benefit from these capabilities.

Weaknesses

Not friendly for companies without revision numbers. The companies with ad-hoc BOMs and informal processes might struggle with mandated revision number of this product.
Field service and quality processes not as embedded. Field service processes as well as quality processes are not embedded as part of the product, posing challenges in centralizing processes for all quality touch points.
Weaker core accounting and finance layers. Finance and accounting layers are not going to be as strong as some of the other products that are on this list.

1. Infor CloudSuite LN

Infor CloudSuite LN is designed for discrete manufacturing companies that require diversified support for different discrete business models globally. It is one of the most comprehensive suites among the solutions on this list. While other solutions may claim mixed-mode manufacturing capabilities or extensive suite components, they are often limited in specific manufacturing types or product types. In contrast, CloudSuite LN can cover a wide range of options, including discrete manufacturing and distribution. Thus, acquiring #1 spot on our list of top discrete manufacturing ERP systems.

Strengths

Comprehensive discrete capabilities. It is designed for discrete manufacturing companies with diverse business business models containing different mode types.
Pre-integrated suite. The suite is tailored and flavored with industry-specific best-of-breed tools such as CAD and PLM, maintained and supported by Infor.
Global capabilities. Compared to other smaller products such as Epicor Kinetic or Infor CSI, Infor CloudSuite LN can natively support more than 30 countries for companies seeking global operational synergies among entities.

Weaknesses

Expensive. The license is likely to be perceived as expensive by smaller companies as the enterprise layers included might not be as relevant for them.
Not suitable for SMBs below $250M in revenue. Not sold to smaller companies. Infor might push companies to smaller products such as CSI. Going outside of Infor might be a better choice in such scenarios as they might be able to match some layers of LN for smaller companies.
Ecosystem. The ecosystem and consulting base is fairly limited as with most prescriptive products.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, the landscape of discrete manufacturing ERP systems is vast and varied, catering to the unique needs of companies involved in producing distinct items through assembly processes. From robust supply chain management to intricate inventory control, these systems play a critical role in optimizing production efficiency and ensuring compliance. Each ERP solution offers its strengths and weaknesses, with considerations ranging from technological sophistication to industry-specific functionality.

As we’ve explored the top 10 discrete manufacturing ERP systems for 2024, it’s evident that the ideal choice depends on factors such as company size, industry focus, and operational complexity. By aligning ERP selection with specific business requirements, organizations can harness the power of these systems to drive growth and streamline operations. While this list offers valuable insights, seeking advice from an independent ERP consultant can greatly enhance your implementation success.

FAQs

What is discrete manufacturing and how does it differ from process manufacturing?

Discrete manufacturing involves producing distinct items through assembly processes, with each component combined to create a final product. This method results in tangible, countable products that can be individually tracked. In contrast, process manufacturing produces goods in bulk, such as chemicals or beverages, resulting in homogeneous outputs rather than discrete items.

What are the essential ERP needs for discrete manufacturing companies?

Discrete manufacturing ERP systems must include modules for production planning, inventory control, and supply chain coordination. They should support detailed tracking of parts and components, efficient scheduling and resource allocation, real-time visibility into production processes, quality management, engineering change control, and compliance tracking. Integration with CAD systems, advanced analytics, and flexible reporting tools are also crucial.

Why is Infor CloudSuite LN ranked as the top discrete manufacturing ERP system for 2024?

Infor CloudSuite LN is ranked #1 due to its comprehensive capabilities tailored for discrete manufacturing companies with diverse business models. It offers a pre-integrated suite with industry-specific tools, global operational support, and robust discrete manufacturing functionalities. Despite its higher cost and limited suitability for smaller companies, its extensive features and global reach make it the leading choice for larger enterprises.

MS BC vs Infor LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / July 1, 2024 June 26, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central serves as a logical choice for companies outgrowing smaller ERP, MRP, and accounting systems like QuickBooks, Microsoft GP, Odoo, Katana, or Fulcrum. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. The sweet spot for MS BC would be $30M-$250 in revenue and a higher revenue band for companies that might use MS BC just for accounting and financial reporting while using mature operational systems at the subsidiary level. Whereas, Infor LN is successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range.

The biggest advantage of MS BC is its consulting ecosystem and community support, which is much bigger than most ERP ecosystems. Contrastingly, Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

MS BC is also ideal for companies with diversified, global operations aspiring to keep all of their entities in one database for easier reconciliation and tracking. While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. Choosing between MS BC vs Infor LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

MS BC vs Infor LN ERP Independent Review 2024

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

	MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Started in	2018 (Previously NAV)	2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership by	Microsoft	Koch Industries
No. of customers	60000+	1000+

What is MS Dynamics 365 Business Central?

Rearchitected with cloud-native technologies, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is the SMB solution from Microsoft, globalized and localized in most countries with a consulting base available virtually in any country or language. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central serves as a logical choice for companies outgrowing smaller ERP, MRP, and accounting systems like QuickBooks, Microsoft GP, Odoo, Katana, or Fulcrum. It is positioned against competitors such as Netsuite, Sage Intacct, and Acumatica. It also offers a vibrant ecosystem with numerous add-ons catering to industry-specific needs.

The sweet spot for MS BC would be $30M-$250 in revenue and a higher revenue band for companies that might use MS BC just for accounting and financial reporting while using mature operational systems at the subsidiary level. The biggest advantage of MS Dynamics 365 BC is its consulting ecosystem and community support, which is much bigger than most ERP ecosystems, and that’s why it’s probably one of the most popular solutions across geographies.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is also ideal for companies with diversified, global operations aspiring to keep all of their entities in one database for easier reconciliation and tracking. While the add-ons might allow companies to use Microsoft Dynamics Business Central for complex industrial operations, the natural design and core would be compatible with companies in industries such as non-profit, public sector, FMCG, F&B distribution, very light assembly manufacturing, telco, media, tech, energy, and utilities.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Infor CloudSuite LN is a complete product suite to meet the needs of an enterprise particularly similar to Epicor, SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. Infor is also perhaps the only vendor after the larger ones that has the capabilities to build best-of-breed architecture akin to SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft. In fact, Infor might have deeper capabilities than Microsoft in some areas with pre-integrated best-of-breed solutions such as Infor WFM and Nexus. Infor is also the only vendor that can provide depth in several industries while not struggling with the transactional processing requirements of large accounts.

Infor LN is particularly ideal for discrete manufacturing companies. It is successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Positioned for companies surpassing entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, this solution delivers mature capabilities particularly for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. They might also include business operations such as plastic or chemicals as part of their automotive operations. Despite limitations in broader capabilities compared to other vanilla solutions, recent upgrades acknowledge its broader application in various automotive business models.

MS BC vs Infor LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between MS BC vs Infor LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of MS BC vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions.

	MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational Capabilities	Supported and actively installed in most countries globally.	Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse Capabilities	Supports multiple industries and business models.	Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed Capabilities	Pre-integrated with Microsoft CRM and field service but relies on third-party add-ons for additional capabilities.	HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities	May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.	Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational Functionalities	Emphasizes core ERP capabilities, relying on partner add-ons for industry-specific capabilities.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration Capabilities	Common data model, power platform and automate along with MS Azure platform for additional development and integration.	Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities	Lighter manufacturing capabilities.	This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing Model	Per named user, per month. True consumption-based licenses can be adjusted without long-term contracts	Subscription-based
Key Modules	1. Financial Management 2. CRM 3. Distribution Management 4. Supply Chain Management 5. Project Accounting Management 6. Inventory Management 7. Reporting, Dashboard and BI	1. Financials 2. Human Resources 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Purchasing Management 6. Quality Management 7. Sales Management 8. Product Technology

MS BC vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of MS BC vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by MS BC vs Infor LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

		MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Financial Management	General Ledger	Initiates general ledger postings, chart of accounts, general journals, VAT facilities, recurring journals, and source codes.	The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
	Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable	Automates accounts receivables and payables and facilitates seamless reconciliation of accounts for swift and precise financial reporting.	AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
	Cash Flow Management	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
	Currency Management	Manages multiple currencies across the system, including payables and receivables, general ledger reports, resource and inventory items, and bank accounts.	The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
	Tax Management	Offers automated, configurable, and scalable tax determination, calculation, and settlement capabilities, accommodating complex tax scenarios across various business requirements	Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of MS BC vs Infor LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain Management	Warehouse Management	Can be implemented in different complexity levels, depending on a company’s processes and order volume. The main difference is that activities are performed order-by-order in basic warehousing when they are consolidated for multiple orders in advanced warehousing.	Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
	Service Management	Service management is not built as part of the core platform but a pre-integrated specialized app is available for field service operations	Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
	Inventory Management	Ensures inventory availability by automatically computing stock levels, lead times, and reorder thresholds. Also, maintains optimal inventory levels by adjusting orders dynamically based on real-time inventory updates.	Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
	Purchase Order Management	Manages purchase orders, including blanket orders and related processes.	Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
	Sales Order Management	Manages sales orders, including blanket sales orders and associated processes.	They are utilized to sell and deliver items or services to a sold-to business partner under specific terms and conditions, originating from various sources like Contracts, Quotations, EDI, and Planning.
	Requisition Management	Organizes complex distribution processes involving multiple products and suppliers.	Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of MS BC vs Infor LN, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing Management	Production Planning	Enables the creation of production orders, definition of routings, allocation of resources, and optimization of production sequences, ensuring seamless operations.	One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
	BOM and Routing	Allows for the detailed mapping of production processes, including the components, subassemblies, and resources used, as well as the sequence of operations.	It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
	Advanced Planning and Scheduling	Takes into account all demand and supply data, nets the results, and creates suggestions for balancing the supply to meet the demand, ensuring optimized resource utilization and efficient production control.	Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of MS BC vs Infor LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of MS BC vs Infor LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of MS BC vs Infor LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective ERP capabilities and functionalities.

MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Natively supports global regions and localizations where Acumatica, Epicor, or Infor might have limited support.	Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Unlike several products, it has support for several European, Asian, and African countries where most products might struggle.	It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
The data model is friendlier for FMCG and distribution companies requiring native support for complex features such as bin tracking or license plate support.	Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
The product has been completely rearchitected using the cloud-native architecture. Cloud ERP capabilities are stronger than those of competing products.	While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of MS BC vs Infor LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of MS BC vs Infor LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with MS BC vs Infor LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

MS Dynamics 365 BC	Infor CloudSuite LN
Only fit for FMCG-centric distributors. The industrial distribution would require add-ons to support capabilities.	The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
While the ecosystem may have options for distribution industries, it might not have integrations with the best-of-breed eCommerce systems in the industrial distribution space.	Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
The financial traceability may not be as intuitive for global, publicly traded non-profit companies.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
The data layers are highly detailed, requiring substantial consulting help to be successful.	The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Microsoft doesn’t offer any support or control to its smaller products, leading to ERP implementation issues.	The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
While Microsoft Dynamics 365 BC has a vibrant marketplace to augment its core capabilities, the last-mile capabilities required for manufacturing or industrial distribution might be limited.	Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both MS BC and Infor LN present compelling ERP solutions tailored to distinct market segments and operational needs. MS BC stands out with its extensive global support and cloud-native architecture, making it an excellent fit for SMBs in various industries such as non-profits, public sector, FMCG, and light manufacturing. Its strength lies in its vast consulting ecosystem and community support, which facilitate seamless implementation and customization. However, MS BC may require additional third-party add-ons to meet the complex requirements of industrial distribution and more intricate manufacturing operations.

On the other hand, Infor LN excels in serving upper mid-market companies, particularly in discrete manufacturing sectors like automotive, aerospace, and high-tech industries. Its comprehensive suite of pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, and advanced supply chain planning, ensures robust operational capabilities. Despite its strength in handling complex manufacturing processes, Infor LN faces challenges such as limited cloud-native features and a smaller consulting base compared to MS BC. Ultimately, the choice between MS BC vs Infor LN depends on a company’s specific needs, operational complexity, and strategic goals, making it crucial particularly for businesses to conduct a thorough evaluation to determine the most suitable ERP solution. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What is MS Dynamics 365 Business Central and who is it ideal for?

MS Dynamics 365 BC is a cloud-native ERP solution designed for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs). It is globalized and localized in most countries, making it suitable for companies with diverse, global operations. MS BC is particularly ideal for industries such as non-profit, public sector, FMCG, F&B distribution, very light assembly manufacturing, telco, media, tech, energy, and utilities. It is best for businesses with revenues between $30 million and $250 million, offering a vibrant consulting ecosystem and community support.

How does Infor CloudSuite LN differ from entry-level ERP systems, and which companies benefit the most from it?

Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. It is best suited for upper mid-market companies with revenues between $250 million and $750 million. Infor LN is ideal for discrete manufacturing sectors such as automotive, aerospace, and high tech. It provides a superior suite experience with enterprise-grade functionalities including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

What are the primary advantages of using MS Dynamics 365 Business Central compared to Infor CloudSuite LN?

MS Dynamics 365 Business Central offers extensive global support, a cloud-native architecture, and a vast consulting ecosystem, making it popular across various geographies. It supports a wide range of industries and business models, providing a flexible ERP solution for SMBs. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN excels in handling complex manufacturing processes and offers a robust suite experience with pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities. However, MS BC’s consulting community and add-ons make it more adaptable for diverse business needs compared to the more specialized capabilities of Infor LN.

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / June 26, 2024 June 26, 2024

Oracle ERP Cloud remains a top choice for large companies across diverse industries, particularly media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare. Despite the need for internal IT expertise, it is also suitable for companies with a need to integrate various third-party software systems. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations.

It is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. On the other hand, Oracle Cloud ERP particularly caters to companies needing ledger-level security and hierarchical financial reporting. Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies.

Choosing between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

	Oracle Cloud ERP	Infor CloudSuite LN
Started in	2012	2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership by	Oracle	Koch Industries
No. of customers	10000+	1000+

What is Oracle Cloud ERP?

Oracle ERP Cloud remains a top choice for large companies across diverse industries, including media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare (post-acquisition of Cerner). It is particularly suitable for organizations with substantial internal IT expertise and a requirement for integrating various proprietary and third-party software systems, such as patient claims management or utility billing solutions.

Oracle ERP Cloud is well-suited for global companies using it as their corporate financial ledger while employing other systems at the subsidiary level. Its robust financial capabilities cater to companies needing ledger-level security and hierarchical financial reporting, such as LOB, functions, or funds. Additionally, it seamlessly integrates a powerful HCM solution along with a natively integrated EPM solution.

Oracle ERP Cloud excels in risk management, advertising, and Cx cloud, particularly catering to industries like financial services and insurance. While it is a superior fit for service-centric industries, its success in product-centric industries has been limited. Often used as a corporate ledger, it might deploy another operationally rich solution at the subsidiary level in certain industries. Despite its strength for large enterprises, Oracle ERP Cloud is not the ideal choice for SMB customers.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions.

	Oracle Cloud ERP	Infor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational Capabilities	Enterprise-grade multi-entity capabilities worldwide.	Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse Capabilities	Supports varied business models, may need third-party add-ons for industry specifics.	Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed Capabilities	Suite includes HCM, CPQ, WMS, RMS, TMS.	HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities	Requires add-ons for micro-verticals.	Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational Functionalities	Deeper supply chain and logistics capabilities.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration Capabilities	Enterprise-grade integration suite with pre-integrated components.	Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities	Best value for focused manufacturing at subsidiary level.	This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing Model	Named-user based	Subscription-based
Key Modules	1. Financial Management 2. Project Management 3. Procurement 4. Risk Management and Compliance 5. Enterprise Performance Management 6. Supply Chain and Manufacturing 7. ERP Analytics	1. Financials 2. Human Resources 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Purchasing Management 6. Quality Management 7. Sales Management 8. Product Technology

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

		Oracle Cloud ERP	Infor CloudSuite LN
Financial Management	General Ledger	Enterprise-grade ledgers to support multi-country operations at the global level with layers of sub-ledgers and complex closing process.	The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
	Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable	Support for complex, global AR and AP processes, including shared services.	AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
	Cash Flow Management	Enterprise-grade capabilities for cash and treasury management.	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
	Currency Management	Enterprise-grade capabilities for currency management, including support for complex currency processes such as hedging.	The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
	Tax Management	Global and enterprise-grade tax management capabilities, with support for most countries in the world.	Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain Management	Warehouse Management	Streamlines warehouse operations, enhances inventory management, and ensures seamless multichannel fulfillment, end-to-end inventory visibility, and integration with advanced features for efficient resource allocation and workflow optimization.	Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
	Service Management	Ensures efficient and effective service delivery through features like service request management, incident handling, and knowledge management.	Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
	Inventory Management	Enables efficient management of goods flow, including inbound, within the warehouse, and outbound, while also supporting consigned inventory capabilities.	Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
	Purchase Order Management	Helps organizations digitally manage and process purchase orders for supply chain and procurement activities, improving efficiency and reducing overhead costs.	Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
	Requisition Management	Ability to manage complex requisition management processes of globally complex enterprises.	Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		Oracle Cloud ERP	Infor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing Management	Production Planning	Offers production planning capabilities including capacity planning, MRP, shop floor control, and demand planning.	One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
	BOM and Routing	Allows you to define lists of components associated with a parent item and outlines step-by-step operations required for manufacturing an assembly.	It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
	Advanced Planning and Scheduling	Plans all supply chain facilities, supporting both short-term detailed scheduling and long-term aggregate planning within a single plan. It also considers finite capacity constraints and offers holistic optimization capabilities.	Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

Oracle Cloud ERP	Infor CloudSuite LN
The product architecture supports the needs of large, complex financial organizations with deep sub-ledger hierarchies.	Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Oracle Cloud ERP has an ecosystem of experienced consultants capable of handling the architecture of such complex enterprises.	It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
The embedded HCM and CRM processes are suitable for large non-profit organizations. The P2P workflows are friendlier for the indirect procurement needs of non-profit organizations.	Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
The workload Oracle Cloud ERP is designed to process millions of GL entries per hour.	While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

Oracle Cloud ERP	Infor CloudSuite LN
Transactional and financial traceability may not be intuitive for large enterprises.	The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
Data model and translations could overwhelm companies transitioning from QuickBooks.	Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
Complex MRP runs might pose challenges for costing and scheduling.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
Customization and configuration may take longer due to unnecessary functionality.	The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
P2P processes, CPQ, and manufacturing capabilities may not suit product-centric organizations.	The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
Limited last-mile functionality for quality and compliance, requiring add-ons or custom development.	Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Oracle Cloud ERP and Infor LN offer robust and comprehensive ERP solutions tailored to distinct market segments and operational needs. Oracle Cloud ERP is a premier choice for large enterprises with complex financial and operational requirements, particularly excelling in industries such as media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare. Its strength lies in its extensive financial management capabilities, global scalability, and integration with various third-party systems, making it ideal for organizations with substantial IT expertise and global operations. However, it may not be the best fit for small to mid-sized businesses due to its complexity and cost.

On the other hand, Infor LN targets the upper mid-market, specifically companies within the $250M – $750M revenue range, and excels in discrete manufacturing sectors like automotive, aerospace, and high-tech. It provides a mature suite experience with pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities such as PLM, WMS, WFM, and advanced supply chain planning. While it faces challenges in process-centric operations and lacks some cloud-native capabilities, Infor LN remains a strong contender for manufacturing and distribution operations. Ultimately, the choice between Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN should be guided by the specific operational needs, industry requirements, and strategic goals of the organization. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What types of businesses are best suited for Oracle Cloud ERP and Infor CloudSuite LN?

Oracle Cloud ERP is ideal for large enterprises across diverse industries such as media, telecommunications, construction, energy, oil and gas, and healthcare. It is particularly suitable for organizations with substantial internal IT expertise and a need for integrating various third-party software systems. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN targets upper mid-market companies, specifically those within the $250M – $750M revenue range, and excels in discrete manufacturing sectors like automotive, aerospace, and high-tech.

How do Oracle Cloud ERP and Infor CloudSuite LN differ in their market positioning and capabilities?

Oracle Cloud ERP targets large, global companies with revenues generally exceeding $1 billion, offering strong financial capabilities, seamless integration, and industry-specific solutions. Infor CloudSuite LN, however, is designed for upper mid-market companies and provides mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. It includes pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities such as PLM, WMS, and advanced supply chain planning, making it ideal for companies needing robust manufacturing solutions.

What are the primary strengths and limitations of Oracle Cloud ERP compared to Infor CloudSuite LN?

Oracle Cloud ERP excels in providing extensive financial management capabilities, global scalability, and integration with various third-party systems, making it a premier choice for large enterprises with complex requirements. However, it may not be the best fit for small to mid-sized businesses due to its complexity and cost. Infor CloudSuite LN, while strong in discrete manufacturing and offering a comprehensive suite experience, faces challenges in process-centric operations and lacks some cloud-native capabilities. It is better suited for upper mid-market companies needing advanced manufacturing and distribution solutions.

SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / June 24, 2024 September 19, 2024

SAP maintains its dominance in the ERP market, largely due to its stronghold in the enterprise segment where deals are significantly larger compared to the mid-market. The architecture complementing the S/4 HANA Suite is particularly favored by enterprise-grade companies, offering leading products like SuccessFactors, Hybris, EWM, Ariba, and Concur. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations.

SAP S/4 HANA targets larger companies with revenues exceeding $1B and with a substantial global presence, aiming to keep all global entities in one system. Whereas, Infor LN is a successful upper mid-market player, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. SAP S/4 HANA often becomes a default choice for enterprise companies due to high transaction volumes, stringent governance, and traceability needs. It particularly shines in product-centric enterprises requiring robust capabilities like MRP and allocation for global workloads. On the other hand, compared to SAP, Infor LN provides a similar suite experience, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

Choosing between SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

	SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
Started in	Pioneers of ERP	2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership by	SAP	Koch Industries
No. of customers	28000+	1000+

What is SAP S/4 HANA?

SAP S/4 HANA remains the top choice for large enterprises with global needs and extensive localization requirements across multiple continents. In this league, its primary rival is Oracle. While alternatives like Unit4, IFS, or Deltek might handle the workload for larger enterprises, they often lack the robust global compliance and transactional capabilities that SAP S/4 HANA offers. Additionally, SAP S/4 HANA excels in providing superior transactional workflow capabilities that are purpose-built to streamline traceability for large and complex organizations.

Moreover, SAP S/4 HANA is an ideal choice for companies seeking a best-of-breed architecture tailored to the needs of specific functions. This architecture allows for operational cores on different ledgers, which is particularly crucial for larger distribution and 3PL companies managing complex WMS networks. Companies with intricate HCM operations and stringent compliance requirements may find it necessary to integrate a best-of-breed system.

Additionally, for enterprises requiring sophisticated eCommerce platforms with components like CDP or CPQ, SAP S/4 HANA provides the essential capabilities. The flexibility and enterprise-grade best-of-breed architecture make SAP S/4 HANA a standout solution for such diverse operational needs. The cloud version may require additional third-party add-ons, similar to NetSuite. Nevertheless, organizations opting for the on-prem version can access superior capabilities, potentially outperforming other ERP systems.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions.

	SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational Capabilities	Deeper multi-entity capabilities; widely installed globally.	Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse Capabilities	Handles diverse business models; may require add-ons for deeper capabilities.	Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed Capabilities	Pre-integrated enterprise apps; augmented by third-party add-ons.	HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities	Limited last-mile capabilities; may also need add-ons for micro-verticals.	Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational Functionalities	Enterprise-grade operational capabilities; industry-specific features limited.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration Capabilities	Has several tools pre-integrated as part of the architecture but industry-specific integrations such as CAD, PLM, etc require third-party add-ons.	Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities	Complex capabilities; industry-specific limitations.	This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and also distribution operations.
Pricing Model	FUE (Full Use Equivalent)	Subscription-based
Key Modules	1. Financial Management 2. Sales 3. Procurement 4. Manufacturing Management 5. Supply Chain Management 6. Professional Services Automation 7. CRM	1. Financials 2. Human Resources 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Purchasing Management 6. Quality Management 7. Sales Management 8. Product Technology

SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

		SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
Financial Management	General Ledger	Can support the needs of even the most complex financial organizations with more than ten ledger rollups at the country level and conversions.	The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
	Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable	Supports global collaboration of customers and vendors, including shared service model.	AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and also balance management.
	Cash Flow Management	Complex treasury capabilities with support for global operations, including maintaining treasury KPIs, workflows, and processes for dedicated treasury departments.	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
	Currency Management	Can support complex currency workflows such as hedging and planning for current impact on different financial statements and accounts globally.	The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
	Tax Management	Has built-in support for taxes in over 100 countries.	Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain Management	Warehouse Management	Can support embedded or standalone architectural patterns along with complex business models such as 3PL or warehouse value-added services for third-party logistics.	Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
	Service Management	Can support complex quotes and service scheduling workflows of globally operated companies with large crews of field workers with scheduling dependencies of global operations.	Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
	Inventory Management	Robust inventory management capabilities accommodating many different business models and inventory types of complex, global organizations.	Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
	Purchase Order Management	Complex purchase order management workflows with automated approval rules, multiple layers of hierarchies of global organizations with procurement processes integrated with project management, and MRP engines.	Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
	Requisition Management	Ability to manage complex requisition management processes of globally complex enterprises.	Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing Management	Production Planning	One of the most complex planning capabilities with enterprise-grade strategies to optimize production cycles for global companies.	One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
	BOM and Routing	Enterprise-grade BOM scalability for a variety of business models and products.	It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
	Advanced Planning and Scheduling	Enterprise-grade advanced APS capabilities for complex globally distributed planning workloads that need to be collaborated across geographies.	Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
It is an ideal solution as the corporate financial ledger for global companies with multiple layers of financial hierarchies operating in multiple countries.	Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
The item master, product model, and warehouse architecture can accommodate the needs of most manufacturing business models.	It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
Because of the power of HANA, SAP S/4 HANA can process very complex MRP runs with product models containing millions of serial numbers and SKUs, making it much faster than most ERP systems.	Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Ideal fit for complex operations with its transactional maps capabilities built with the products, making debugging complex financial enterprises easier.	While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

SAP S/4 HANA	Infor CloudSuite LN
The controls provided as part of the product may feel unnecessary and overwhelming for smaller companies.	The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
Overbloated financial control processes, such as compliance, allocation, and approval flows, are only necessary for large organizations.	Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
The data model is overwhelming for smaller organizations outgrowing QuickBooks or smaller ERP systems.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
Despite advanced financial traceability and technical capabilities, the functional capabilities are not as rich as with its on-prem version.	The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
While SAP S/4 HANA has one of the best best-of-breed solutions, they might not be as pre-integrated as other solutions.	The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
In industries where it might not be the most frequently installed as an operational solution, the other solutions are likely to have deeper last-mile capabilities.	Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between SAP S/4 HANA and Infor CloudSuite LN hinges on the specific needs and scale of an organization. SAP S/4 HANA stands out for its robust global capabilities, making it the preferred choice for large enterprises with extensive international operations and complex financial hierarchies. Its best-of-breed architecture, deep transactional workflows, and comprehensive support for diverse business models ensure that it can meet the demands of the most intricate and expansive organizations. However, these extensive features may seem overwhelming and unnecessarily complex for smaller companies.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN excels as an upper mid-market solution, providing mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. It is particularly well-suited for discrete manufacturing sectors such as automotive and aerospace, offering integrated functionalities that rival those of larger ERP systems. While it may have some limitations in broader business model applications and cloud-native capabilities, Infor LN’s focused approach and pre-integrated best-of-breed solutions make it a powerful option for mid-sized companies or as a subsidiary solution in a two-tier ERP setup. Also, businesses must carefully assess their specific requirements with assistance from an independent ERP consultant. They can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What is the ideal company size for SAP S/4 HANA and Infor CloudSuite LN?

SAP S/4 HANA is ideal for large enterprises with revenues exceeding $1 billion, especially those with a substantial global presence. It caters to complex organizational needs across multiple continents. In contrast, Infor CloudSuite LN targets upper mid-market companies with revenues in the range of $250 million to $750 million. It is well-suited for discrete manufacturing sectors like automotive and aerospace.

How do SAP S/4 HANA and Infor CloudSuite LN differ in their approach to global capabilities?

SAP S/4 HANA offers extensive multi-entity capabilities and is widely installed globally, making it suitable for organizations with complex international operations. It provides robust support for financial hierarchies and global trade compliance. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN has sufficient financial and global trade functionalities pre-integrated with its products, though it is more focused on specific business models within its target market.

What are the main strengths and limitations of SAP S/4 HANA compared to Infor CloudSuite LN?

SAP S/4 HANA excels in providing deep transactional workflows and best-of-breed architecture for large, complex organizations. However, its extensive features may be overwhelming for smaller companies. Infor CloudSuite LN, while not as broad in global capabilities, offers mature functionalities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations, making it a powerful solution for upper mid-market companies. Its limitations include less focus on process-centric operations and fewer cloud-native capabilities compared to its competitors.

WBSP581: Understanding Unit4 ERP System Capabilities – An Expert Review

Leave a Comment / Enterprise Architecture, ERP, High Tech & Electronics, Podcast, Uncategorized / By Abdulbasit ilori / June 20, 2024 June 22, 2024

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems , like those offered by Unit4 ERP are essential tools for businesses, offering a bundled suite of various software components. However, just combining different software offerings does not automatically make a collection an ERP. What determines this is the level of embeddedness of these components. Additionally, the components included within an ERP can vary depending on the industry.

Now while an ERP’s core requirements are finance and accounting, the approach differs across industries. For instance, some systems include Advanced Transportation Management, Financial Planning and Analysis, Product Lifecycle Management, Warehouse Management Systems, or Transportation Management Systems.

In this podcast, a panel of industry experts conducted an independent review of Unit4’s ERP System capabilities. They highlighted its unique suite approach, which includes ERP, Adaptive Case Management, Straight-Through Processing, and Financial Planning and Analysis. Let’s explore all these in detail, beginning with what the core of an ERP should be.

Core Components of an ERP

At its heart, an ERP must provide finance and accounting functionalities. However, the key difference lies in how these components are integrated. For example, some ERPs emphasize the integration of procurement and financial planning capabilities, while others might focus more on project management or human resources.

Service-Centric vs Product-Centric ERPs

ERPs can be broadly classified into two categories – service-centric and product-centric. These two types cater to very different business operations and have unique requirements:

Service-Centric ERPs

These ERP systems are designed specifically for service-centric industries, prioritizing service delivery rather than product distribution. Examples include professional services, the public sector, non-profit organizations, and higher education. In these industries, individual employees and their specific skills and schedules are crucial, making human capital management integration essential.

Product-Centric ERPs

These ERP systems cater to product-centric industries focused on manufacturing and distributing products. They require tight integration with supply chain management, warehouse management, and transportation management systems to ensure efficient production and distribution processes.

The Importance of Cross-Functional Integration

Cross-functional integration is the backbone of an effective ERP system. It ensures that different modules within the ERP can communicate and share data seamlessly. This integration is crucial for maintaining data integrity and providing a unified view of the organization’s operations. For service-centric industries, this includes tight integration of HCM (Human Capital Management) processes with financial and operational workflows.

For example, in industries like consulting, every individual’s specific expertise, certification, and availability need to be tracked carefully. This is essential for accurate project scheduling, resource allocation, and cost estimation. Unit4 ERP System capabilities excels in this aspect, making it a strong contender in the service-centric ERP market.

On the other hand, in product-centric industries, integration between ERP and supply chain processes is more critical.

Unit4 ERP Capabilities – The Unique Approach

Unit4 ERP system capabilities are comprehensive suite, particularly for service-centric industries, such as professional services, the public sector, not-for-profit, and higher education. Their approach ensures that all critical business functions are seamlessly integrated, providing a full view of the organization’s operations. Their suite are not limited to the following:

ERP

Core financial and accounting functionalities

HCM

Human Capital Management to handle your people processes, simplify and increase the accuracy of your payroll, and more.

FM&A

Unit4 Financials by Coda offers integrated financial management and accounting solutions for full control and visibility of the entire record-to-report cycle.

FP&A

Financial Planning and Analysis for detailed budgeting and agile data-driven forecasting.

S2C

Enhanced procurement capabilities, especially after acquiring Scanmarket, which added strategic sourcing and contract lifecycle management functionalities.

Comparing Unit4 ERP System with Other Service-Centric ERPs

Workday

Similar to Unit4, Workday integrates HCM with finance and procurement, making it a strong competitor in the service-centric ERP market. It started as an HCM solution and later added financial management capabilities.

NetSuite

Offers a broader range of functionalities, including support for product-centric processes, but is also strong in service-centric verticals.

FinancialForce

Another ERP focused on Professional Services Automation built on the Salesforce platform. It offers finance and PSA but lacks comprehensive HCM integration.

Sage Intacct

Targets service-centric verticals with a focus on finance and accounting but lacks the comprehensive suite offered by Unit4.

Blackbaud

Caters to the SMB segment focusing on non-profits, offering a slightly different approach than Unit4’s mid-market focus.

Features and Acquisitions of Unit4

Unit4 has expanded its capabilities through strategic acquisitions. For example, the acquisition of Scanmarket brought advanced procure-to-pay (P2P) functionalities into its suite. P2P is essential for managing procurement processes from requisition to payment, ensuring transparency and control over organizational spending.

User Experience and Flexibility Of Unit4 ERP

Unit4’s ERP system stands out for its user-centric design and flexibility. It adapts to the specific needs of its users, providing intuitive interfaces and customizable workflows. This is particularly beneficial for service-centric industries where flexibility in handling complex processes and projects is crucial. The system’s ability to adapt to changing business needs without requiring significant reconfiguration makes it a preferred choice for dynamic organizations.

Unit4 ERP Integration with Emerging Technologies

Unit4 has also integrated emerging technologies like AI and machine learning into its ERP suite. These technologies enhance decision-making by providing predictive analytics and insights, automating routine tasks, and improving overall operational efficiency. For instance, AI-driven analytics in the FP&A module can help organizations forecast financial performance more accurately, identify trends, and make informed strategic decisions.

Conclusion

Unit4 stands out as a leading ERP system for service-centric industries, offering a comprehensive suite that includes ERP, ACM, STP, and FP&A. Its ability to provide deep integration across these functions makes it a powerful tool for organizations where individual skills and detailed financial planning are crucial. By addressing the unique requirements of service-centric industries, Unit4 ensures that businesses can operate efficiently and effectively, making it a valuable asset in the ERP market.

Whether you’re a professional services firm, a non-profit, or part of the public sector, understanding the strengths and capabilities of Unit4 can help you make informed decisions about your ERP needs.

MS Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / June 19, 2024 June 11, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O stands out for its enhanced cloud-native functionality, leading in capabilities over competitors like SAP S/4 HANA and Oracle Cloud ERP. It caters to large, global companies with complex business models, offering mature technology and a successful track record across industries. In contrast, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. It is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range.

Dynamics 365 F&O is ideal for companies with diverse global entities, spanning industries like manufacturing, distribution, and construction. Whereas, Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. However, navigating the Dynamics 365 ecosystem may require assistance due to the presence of unqualified partners. Similarly, while Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies.

Choosing between Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

MS Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

	MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Started in	One of the most established enterprise software companies in the world	2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership by	Microsoft	Koch Industries
No. of customers	50,000+	1000+

What is Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (F&O)?

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O is often the third choice for larger global accounts, following SAP S/4 HANA and Oracle Cloud ERP. It offers a mature ecosystem with modern, cloud-native technologies, thus proving successful across various industries. It is perhaps the most diverse solution accommodating several global business models in one database, making it an ideal solution particularly for lower enterprise companies. While a great fit as a corporate ledger for large enterprises, it’s not as proven as other leading solutions in the enterprise market with workloads as high as millions of journal entries per hour that Fortune 1000 companies might demand.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O also excels in localizations where other solutions may falter. A vibrant ecosystem makes it suitable for private equity and holding companies aiming to streamline their portfolio companies on one solution. SMBs, however, might find its complex data model overwhelming. Large, complex global companies particularly with revenues exceeding $1B will find Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O appealing.

Although Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations lacks the operational depth of specialized solutions, larger companies favor its corporate-level financial control. In a two-tier setting, they often utilize additional Dynamics 365 F&O add-ons like Adeaca for operational requirements. Furthermore, MS365 F&O offers seamless integration for field service, HCM, and CRM at the database level, empowering large companies to construct a best-of-breed architecture. It is especially strong with WBS-centric processes covering operational and financial schedules equally well. The challenge with MS Dynamics 365 F&O would be the best-of-breed ancillary system, which are not owned and maintained by Microsoft, requiring third-party add-ons.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions.

	MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational Capabilities	Can host multiple entities from different countries.	Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse Capabilities	Can accommodate most business models, may require add-ons.	Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed Capabilities	Crucial capabilities such as PLM, etc, may not be pre-integrated.	HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities	May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.	Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational Functionalities	Rich operational functionality for large enterprises.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration Capabilities	Pre-integrated with CRM and field service.	Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities	Mature capabilities support diverse models.	This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing Model	Cost per user per month with flexible user management, without long-term commitment.	Subscription-based
Key Modules	1. Financial Management 2. Supply Chain Management 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Human Capital Management 5. Business Intelligence and Reporting 6. Security and Compliance 7. Develop and Customize 8. System Administration	1. Financials 2. Human Resources 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Purchasing Management 6. Quality Management 7. Sales Management 8. Product Technology

Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

		MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Financial Management	General Ledger	Creates and maintains accurate records for financial transactions and generates regular financial reports.	The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
	Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable	Automates workflows for managing vendor invoices, payments, and customer invoicing, streamlining the entire invoicing process and improving cash flow management.	AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
	Cash Flow Management	Provides comprehensive cash flow forecasting capabilities, allowing to project future cash positions, identify potential shortfalls, and make informed decisions.	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
	Other Feartures	Chart of Accounts – Enables the creation of a hierarchical structure for categorizing financial information.	Currency Management – The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
		Budgeting and Forecasting – Creates and manages budgets across different departments and business units. Also, leverages historical data and predictive analytics, to make accurate projections and align their financial strategies with business goals.	Tax Management – Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain Management	Warehouse Management	Provides advanced warehouse and transportation management features, including inventory tracking, order fulfillment, shipment planning, and real-time visibility into logistics operations.	Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
	Service Management	Establishes service agreements and service subscriptions, handles service orders and customer inquiries, and manages and analyzes the delivery of services to customers.	Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
	Inventory Management	Offers real-time visibility into inventory levels, demand, and supply, enabling organizations to optimize their inventory planning, reduce stockouts, and improve customer satisfaction.	Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
	Other Features	Procurement and Sourcing – Streamlines the procurement process by providing end-to-end visibility and control over purchasing activities. Also automates and optimizes the procurement workflows, reducing costs and improving supplier relationships.	Purchase Order Management – Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
		Transportation Management – Offers real-time visibility into logistics operations.	Sales Order Management – They are utilized to sell and deliver items or services to a sold-to business partner under specific terms and conditions, originating from various sources like Contracts, Quotations, EDI, and Planning.
		Demand Planning and Forecasting – Generates accurate demand forecasts, helping organizations optimize production planning, inventory levels, and procurement decisions.	Requisition Management – Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing Management	Production Planning	Provides comprehensive production planning and control capabilities, allowing organizations to optimize their manufacturing processes. The system supports various production scenarios, including make-to-order, make-to-stock, and engineer-to-order, while providing real-time visibility into production schedules, resource allocation, and material requirements.	One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
		Shop Floor Management – Offers real-time monitoring of shop floor activities, capturing data on machine utilization, labor productivity, and production progress.	BOM and Routing – It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
		Product Lifecycle Management – Enables organizations to manage the entire product lifecycle, from design and engineering to manufacturing and after-sales service. The system integrates product data, engineering change orders, and quality management processes, ensuring seamless collaboration and visibility across different departments.	Advanced Planning and Scheduling – Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Has a significant advantage in its extensive consulting base and a vibrant marketplace, a unique benefit unmatched by many ERP systems.	Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Supports global operations and business models and pre-baked integration for the best-of-breed CRM and field service solutions.	It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
Embedded WMS and TMS processes help companies that might require end-to-end traceability even after the good leaves the dock.	Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Legacy product rearchitected for the cloud. So, while better than other legacy products that might be behind in the cloud. May not have as superior user experience as required.	While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

MS Dynamics 365 F&O	Infor CloudSuite LN
Overwhelming for smaller companies with the configuration and approval flows built for large enterprises.	The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
Might not be able to match the performance expectations of larger organizations where processing millions of journal entries per hour is required.	Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
Overbloated financial control processes, such as compliance, allocation, and approval flows, which are only necessary for large organizations.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
May require consulting assistance to navigate the channel, given the presence of unqualified ISVs and VARs.	The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Integration with A&D-specific PLMs, configurators, and CPQ systems is not out-of-the-box, increasing the implementation time and costs.	The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
The last-mile capabilities for specific A&D verticals, such as integration with GovCon processes and databases, may require solutions from third parties or custom integration, making the implementation overly expensive.	Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O and Infor LN offer robust and comprehensive ERP solutions tailored to different market needs and business complexities. Dynamics 365 F&O particularly excels in providing a diverse, cloud-native environment suitable for large, global companies with intricate financial and operational requirements. Its extensive consulting base, rich ecosystem, and seamless integration with other Microsoft solutions make it a preferred choice particularly for large enterprises and private equity firms managing diverse portfolios. However, its complexity and scale might overwhelm smaller organizations or those with simpler operational models.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN shines in the upper mid-market segment, particularly for companies with revenues between $250M and $750M, focusing on discrete manufacturing and intricate supply chain operations. Its pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, and advanced supply chain planning, offer mature capabilities particularly for complex manufacturing environments. Despite its strengths, Infor LN may face challenges in process-centric operations and lacks the extensive cloud-native features and user experience offered by newer solutions. Ultimately, the choice between Dynamics 365 F&O vs Infor LN hinges on a detailed assessment of specific business needs, operational complexities, and also long-term strategic goals. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What are the primary differences between Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (F&O) and Infor CloudSuite LN?

Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O is tailored for large, complex global companies with revenues nearing $1 billion and multiple global entities, offering robust cloud-native functionality and integration with other Microsoft products. Infor CloudSuite LN, on the other hand, targets upper mid-market companies with revenues between $250M and $750M, excelling in discrete manufacturing and intricate supply chain operations with pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities like PLM, WMS, and advanced supply chain planning.

Which industries and business models are best suited for Dynamics 365 F&O and Infor CloudSuite LN?

Dynamics 365 F&O is ideal for companies with complex business models, including discrete and process manufacturing, distribution, and project-based business models such as construction SMBs. It supports diverse global entities and complex financial and operational requirements. Infor CloudSuite LN is best suited for upper mid-market companies, particularly in discrete manufacturing sectors like Automotive, Aerospace, and High Tech, offering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.

What are the key strengths and challenges of Dynamics 365 F&O and Infor CloudSuite LN?

Dynamics 365 F&O’s key strengths include its extensive consulting base, vibrant marketplace, and seamless integration with other Microsoft solutions, making it suitable for large enterprises and private equity firms. However, it can be overwhelming for smaller companies and might require consulting assistance for channel navigation. Infor CloudSuite LN offers mature capabilities for complex manufacturing environments with pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities but may face challenges in process-centric operations and lacks extensive cloud-native features and user experience compared to newer solutions.

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / June 17, 2024 June 11, 2024

NetSuite caters to globally dispersed small to mid-market firms, offering robust financial capabilities and localization across many countries. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. NetSuite suits diverse businesses, including service-centric, distribution-centric, and B2C organizations. Meanwhile, Infor CloudSuite LN is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range.

NetSuite targets firms with revenues between $10M and $1B, emphasizing stronger financial capabilities. Whereas, Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. NetSuite supports lighter manufacturing and consumer products, particularly in health, beauty, fashion, and CPG. While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies.

Choosing between NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

	NetSuite	Infor CloudSuite LN
Started in	1998	2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership by	Oracle in 2016	Koch Industries
No. of customers	37,000+	1000+

What is NetSuite?

NetSuite stands out as the leading ERP solution, driven by its success for diverse industries particularly seeking stronger financial capabilities over the operational, robust ecosystem, credible marketplace add-ons, and comprehensive functionality. Although not as complex as some competitors like SAP S/4 HANA and Microsoft F&O, NetSuite excels in supporting diverse business models, including omnichannel architecture, matrix/dimensional inventory, and subscription-based models.

While NetSuite excels across industries, it may not be the ideal choice for industrial distributors and manufacturers due to limitations in pricing and item master capabilities. Its strength lies in supporting lighter manufacturing and consumerized products particularly health and beauty, fashion, apparel, and CPG. With robust financial capabilities and an integrated HCM solution, NetSuite is well-suited for service-centric industries, including smaller banks, credit unions, financial services, non-profit organizations, as well as the technology and media sectors.

While NetSuite remains the top-ranked solution due to its product quality, there might be challenges with over-customization and integration issues, leading to implementation failures. Thus, working with NetSuite demands thorough vetting of their solution and architecture.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Infor CloudSuite LN is a complete product suite to meet the needs of an enterprise similar to Epicor, SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. Infor is also perhaps the only vendor after the larger ones that has the capabilities to build best-of-breed architecture akin to SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft. In fact, Infor might have deeper capabilities than Microsoft in some areas with pre-integrated best-of-breed solutions such as Infor WFM and Nexus. Infor is also the only vendor that can provide depth in several industries while not struggling with the transactional processing requirements of large accounts.

Infor LN is ideal for discrete manufacturing companies. It is successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Positioned for companies surpassing entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, this solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform.

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions.

	NetSuite	Infor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational Capabilities	Handles global multi-entity operations but not suitable for enterprise workloads.	Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse Capabilities	Favors B2C, hospitality, and service-centric industries.	Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed Capabilities	Contains pre-integrated HCM and FP&A components with varying maturity.	HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities	Limited last-mile capabilities, especially for manufacturing.	Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational Functionalities	Richer financial capabilities over operational features.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration Capabilities	Offers several pre-integrated solutions with more options from Celigo.	Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities	Limited BOM layers for assembly-centric operations, requiring additional add-ons.	This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing Model	Named-user based with inflexible long-term contracts.	Subscription-based
Key Modules	1. Financial Management 2. Accounting 3. Global Business Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Order Management 6. Supply Chain Management 7. Warehouse Management 8. Procurement 9. Customer Relationship Management	1. Financials 2. Human Resources 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Purchasing Management 6. Quality Management 7. Sales Management 8. Product Technology

NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management and supply chain management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

		NetSuite	Infor CloudSuite LN
Financial Management	General Ledger	Supports complex general ledgers including public reporting requirements of several countries	The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
	Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable	Automates and streamlines invoice delivery, payment processing, and collections management as well as accounts payable processes.	AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
	Cash Flow Management	Provides visibility to optimize cash flows, monitor bank accounts, and manage liquidity.	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
	Tax Management	Manages domestic and global tax, generates detailed reports, and analyzes transactions real-time.	Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		NetSuite	Infor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain Management	Warehouse Management	Provides the ability to optimize day-to-day warehouse operations, eliminate manual processes and minimize handling costs.	Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
	Inventory Management	Automates inventory management processes with multi-location fulfilment, cycle counting, replenishment, traceability and item visibility.	Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control.
	Procurement	Streamlines procurement processes with source management, purchase management, vendor management and invoice processing.	Manages purchase activities and maintains the resulting data.
	Supply Chain Planning	Provides the ability to analyze demand, determine replenishment requirements, add stock and create orders according to an up-to-date supply plan.	Supplies planning capabilities are one of the robust for global manufacturing operations including most of the Supply Chain suite components pre-integrated as part of the suite.
	Supply Chain Execution	Optimizes all supply chain assets, controls costs at each step.	Supplies execution capabilities are one of the robust for global manufacturing operations including most of the Supply Chain execution components pre-integrated as part of the suite.

Pros of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

NetSuite	Infor CloudSuite LN
Provides richer financial capabilities over operational, with leaner operational layers built with the product.	Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Ideal for SMBs operating in different countries.	It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
The data model is B2C friendly, supporting integration with B2C channels.	Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Ideal for eCommerce-centric SMBs because of the ecosystem and the integration operations available for eCommerce-centric companies.	While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of NetSuite vs. Infor CloudSuite LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with NetSuite vs. Infor CloudSuite LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

NetSuite	Infor CloudSuite LN
Not a great value for companies operating only in a few countries.	The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
May struggle with transactional workload requirements of companies over $1B and the ones that might be acquiring 10-20 entities every year.	Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
Not ideal for startups with simpler operating models.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
Named-user-based pricing requires allocating fixed costs, even for seasonal workers or external users accessing the subset of data such as customer or vendor portals.	The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Not fit for companies seeking OEM-owned integration with core operational systems such as CAD or PLM.	The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
The last-mile capabilities required for manufacturing or industrial distribution are extremely limited.	Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, choosing between NetSuite vs Infor CloudSuite LN depends significantly on a company’s specific needs and operational focus. NetSuite excels for small to mid-market firms with global operations, offering strong financial capabilities and localization features that suit diverse industries, including service-centric, distribution-centric, and B2C organizations. Its strengths lie in supporting lighter manufacturing and consumer products, particularly in sectors like health, beauty, fashion, and CPG. However, NetSuite may not be ideal for industrial distributors and manufacturers due to its limitations in pricing and item master capabilities. Despite its robust financial management, the complexity of implementation and potential over-customization issues necessitate careful consideration.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN is tailored for more intricate manufacturing and distribution operations, making it a superior choice for upper mid-market companies with revenues ranging from $250M to $750M. It offers a comprehensive suite experience similar to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade functionalities including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. While Infor LN is excellent for discrete manufacturing, it faces challenges with process-centric operations and may not be the best fit for companies requiring extensive global capabilities or those in process manufacturing. Thus, further exploration and evaluation are essential to determine the best-fit ERP solution for a company’s unique needs. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What are the primary differences between NetSuite and Infor CloudSuite LN in terms of market positioning and ideal fit?

NetSuite is designed for small to mid-sized businesses with revenues ranging from $10M to $1B, focusing on firms that need robust financial capabilities and global operations support. It is particularly suitable for diverse industries, including service-centric, distribution-centric, and B2C organizations. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN targets upper mid-market companies with revenues between $250M and $750M. It excels in intricate manufacturing and distribution operations, making it ideal for sectors such as automotive, aerospace, and high tech.

How do the financial management capabilities of NetSuite compare to those of Infor CloudSuite LN?

NetSuite offers strong financial management features, including complex general ledger support, automation of accounts receivable and payable processes, and comprehensive tax management across multiple countries. Infor CloudSuite LN also provides robust financial capabilities with a core general ledger component, efficient management of AR and AP, and cash management functions. However, Infor LN’s tax management is limited to single-country environments, while NetSuite provides broader global tax handling.

What are the strengths and limitations of NetSuite and Infor CloudSuite LN in terms of manufacturing capabilities?

NetSuite supports lighter manufacturing and consumer products, particularly in health, beauty, fashion, and CPG sectors. It offers multi-location fulfillment, inventory traceability, and basic assembly-centric operations. However, it may struggle with complex manufacturing models and transactional workloads exceeding $1B in revenue. In contrast, Infor CloudSuite LN delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing operations, excelling in discrete manufacturing sectors like automotive and aerospace. It supports complex inventory types and offers pre-integrated tools for supply chain planning and execution. Despite its strengths, Infor LN may not be ideal for process-centric manufacturing and lacks certain cloud-native functionalities.

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN ERP Independent Review 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Shrestha Dash / June 12, 2024 June 11, 2024

Acumatica stands out among three cloud-native ERP vendors particularly focusing on small and medium-sized businesses, alongside NetSuite and Sage Intacct. On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems like Acumatica, Infor CSI, or NetSuite, by delivering mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing intertwined with distribution operations. It is also successful in the upper mid-market, targeting the $250M – $750M revenue range. Acumatica, however, caters well to companies with revenues ranging from $10-100 million, offering limited native localization features yet suitable synergies for global operations.

Infor LN also provides a superior suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, featuring enterprise-grade best-of-breed functionalities, including PLM, WMS, WFM, BI, and a supply chain collaboration platform. Whereas, Acumatica’s strength lies in its multi-branch capabilities and tailored support for various business models such as manufacturing, distribution, construction, and field service.

While Infor LN excels in discrete manufacturing and offers a robust suite experience, it does face certain challenges in specific scenarios such as with process-centric operations for companies. On the other hand, Acumatica serves as an excellent entry-level system for companies transitioning from QuickBooks or smaller point systems seeking seamless cross-functional integration. Choosing between Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN requires a detailed examination, and thus, this comparison offers valuable insights for ERP selection projects. Therefore, let’s explore further.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

	Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Started in	2008	2006 (when Infor acquired BaaN)
Ownership by	EQT Partners in 2019	Koch Industries
No. of customers	10,000+	1000+

What is Acumatica?

Acumatica is one of three cloud-native ERP solutions particularly similar to NetSuite and Sage Intacct. It has extensive multi-branch capabilities, particularly making it friendlier for retail-centric operations. It can also host multiple business models as part of the same database spanning manufacturing, distribution, construction, and field service. Thus, making it friendlier for diverse manufacturing or distribution-centric operations. Because of its limited global operational capabilities, it primarily targets US and UK-based companies. Thus, positioned as an ideal choice for companies within the $10-100 million revenue range, the majority of Acumatica’s customer base falls under this category.

Desiring a user experience akin to Odoo or Quickbooks, Acumatica ERP also offers versatility to accommodate various business models: distribution, manufacturing, or construction-focused. Although Acumatica has limitations in mature features like dimensional inventory or allocation, it is an excellent initial system for companies looking to streamline inventory or costs. With transactional processing and some mature capabilities, such as batch transactional processing, Acumatica is positioned as a valuable choice for businesses venturing into their first or second ERP solution.

Acumatica ERP is a fit for companies seeking cloud-native experience, particularly emphasizing features like enterprise search and mobility over deeper operational capabilities. Despite its focus on small businesses, Acumatica lacks robust globalization and localization features, catering to a limited number of countries by default. This simplicity, however, benefits smaller companies by avoiding unnecessary layers of multi-entity operations. Although targeting small businesses, Acumatica ERP surpasses Odoo or Zoho with the flexibility of its data layers, necessitating consulting help for implementation. The perceived benefit of Acumatica’s pricing is also a challenge, as it’s notoriously difficult to understand and predict.

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN Comparison

Navigating the choice between Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN is a significant decision for businesses particularly looking for operational efficiency and strategic alignment. Thus, this section delves into the comprehensive comparison of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions.

	Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Global Operational Capabilities	Limited multi-entity capabilities.	Has sufficient layers of financial hierarchies and global trade compliance functionality pre-baked with products.
Diverse Capabilities	Operationally rich for smaller companies.	Limited focus on certain business models.
Best-of-breed Capabilities	Limited, relying on third-party add-ons.	HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Last-mile Capabilities	May require add-ons for specific micro-verticals.	Last-mile capabilities along with breadth of capabilities for diversified manufacturing business models.
Operational Functionalities	Emphasizes cloud-native experience but offers deeper operational capabilities and integration for smaller operations in fewer countries.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc.
Integration Capabilities	Natively-integrated WMS functionality, lacks pre-integrated best-of-breed CRM, supports only embedded CRM.	Most tools that a manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Manufacturing Capabilities	Suitable for light manufacturing, limited mature capabilities such as allocation and Kanban.	This solution delivers mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations.
Pricing Model	Consumption-based, named, and concurrent but requires long-term contracts.	Subscription-based
Key Modules	1. Financial Management 2. Construction Management 3. CRM 4. Distribution Management 5. Service Management 6. Manufacturing Management 7. Project Accounting Management 8. Payroll 9. Retail e-Commerce Management 10. Reporting, Dashboard and BI	1. Financials 2. Human Resources 3. Manufacturing Management 4. Inventory Management 5. Purchasing Management 6. Quality Management 7. Sales Management 8. Product Technology

Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN Feature Comparison

Both platforms offer a plethora of features and functionalities designed to streamline business operations and enhance efficiency. In this feature comparison, we delve into particularly the distinct capabilities of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various critical dimensions, providing insights to aid businesses in making informed decisions regarding their ERP selection. Thus, this section discusses features under each of the following modules, particularly financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing management.

Financial Management Comparison

In this section, we are discussing a detailed comparison of the financial management capabilities particularly offered by Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN. By examining their respective strengths and functionalities, particularly in managing financial processes. Businesses can therefore gain valuable insights to determine the best-suited ERP solution for their financial management needs.

		Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Financial Management	General Ledger	Designed to support ledgers limited to support one country. Limited multi-ledger capabilities.	The General Ledger is the core component of Infor LN Financials, recording all transactions within the application that affect accounting.
	Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable	The AR and AP might be limited to just one country with limited synergies among vendors from different countries.	AR manages customer invoices and credit, while AP handles supplier invoices and balance management.
	Cash Flow Management	Manages day-to-day transactions, cash balances, funds transfers, and bank account reconciliations for smaller operations.	Provides comprehensive forecasting, analysis, and Azure ML-based prediction of cash inflows and outflows.
	Currency Management	Creates estimates for new or existing items, convert to bills of material, production orders.	The LN multicurrency systems allow a company to conduct accounting in multiple currencies, calculating and registering amounts in up to three currencies.
	Tax Management	Provides centralized tax configuration, management, and reporting.	Tax reporting is part of financial accounting and is limited to one country, so LN’s tax handling in a multicompany structure is similar to that in a single company environment.

Supply Chain Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the supply chain management capabilities of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN, shedding light particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Supply Chain Management	Warehouse Management	Provides real-time inventory visibility and streamlines warehouse operations.	Warehousing focuses on managing and replenishing goods within a warehouse, including tasks to report and analyze inventory movements.
	Service Management	Enables quick service needs capture, assignment, and real-time tracking, with features like contract management and appointment schedules.	Manages the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of field-based and plant-based products, equipment, and systems.
	Inventory Management	Simplifies inventory processes with flexible item management and quality traceability.	Can support complex inventory types including dedicated inventory masters for MRO or quality components for added granularity and control
	Purchase Order Management	Streamlines procurement processes with policy enforcement and process controls.	Can create and modify purchase orders for purchasing goods.
	Sales Order Management	Centrally manages sales activities and tracks prices and inventory.	They are utilized to sell and deliver items or services to a sold-to business partner under specific terms and conditions, originating from various sources like Contracts, Quotations, EDI, and Planning.
	Requisition Management	Organizes complex distribution processes involving multiple products and suppliers.	Specifies nonsystem planned requirements for different types of items, including inventory items, cost items, and service items.

Manufacturing Management Comparison

In this comparison, we explore and analyze the manufacturing management capabilities of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN, shedding light, particularly on their respective strengths and weaknesses.

		Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Manufacturing Management	Production Planning	Assists manufacturers in addressing production demand with the agility to adjust to fluctuating schedules, unforeseen equipment malfunctions, delayed deliveries from suppliers, and other unexpected occurrences affecting operations on the factory floor.	One of the most robust production planning capabilities including advanced planning and scheduling capabilities for diverse manufacturing operations
	BOM and Routing	Lets you efficiently plan and manage inventories, costs and manufacturing processes.	It is stored as general item data for LN in Item Production Data (IPD).
	Advanced Planning and Scheduling	Lets you create a more streamlined and accurate production scheduled, better enforce delivery dates and optimize for capacity.	Stores scheduling information for projects, allowing you to define project plans along with associated activities and milestones.

Pros of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN

When evaluating ERP solutions, understanding the distinct advantages of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN is crucial. In this section, we are particularly exploring the strengths of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various dimensions. Thus, shedding light on their respective capabilities and functionalities.

Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Great 1st or 2nd ERP choice particularly due to limited layers and mature capabilities for larger companies.	Ideal for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting for private equity-owned or holding companies.
Accommodates different business models spread in fewer countries under one database.	It can support the most complex manufacturing business models, WBS-centric manufacturing, or support for attributes with MRP planning.
Great fit for SMB B2B businesses with complex product mixes.	Most tools that make-to manufacturer would require, such as HCM, PLM, data lake, ERP, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, are all pre-integrated with LN.
Born in the cloud with consistent design principles across the application.	While most smaller solutions might require ad-hoc arrangements for global financial operations, Infor CloudSuite LN has them natively built.

Cons of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN

Just like recognizing strengths is important, it’s also crucial to weigh the specific drawbacks of Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN. Therefore, in this section, we will delve into the limitations and challenges associated with Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN across various operational and financial dimensions.

Acumatica	Infor CloudSuite LN
Limited capabilities when multiple countries with different currencies and sub-ledgers need to be hosted as part of the same solution.	The limited focus on certain business models poses the risk of requiring other ERP systems to support complex and diverse business operations such as process manufacturing or metal-centric A&D companies.
Not fit for companies with over $100 million in revenue.	Private equity and holding companies requiring global solutions with a tier-2 solution at the subsidiary level might not be the best use of Infor LN’s strengths.
The mobile capabilities are leaner for complex reporting scenarios such as parallel processing or reporting labor.	Infor LN is a legacy solution with limited cloud-native capabilities such as universal search, mobile experience, etc
Consumption-based pricing requires consulting expertise to estimate transactions as the pricing is not as predictable.	The consulting base and marketplaces are virtually non-existent for Infor LN.
Multiple add-ons such as MES, PLM, and quality, posing integration and communication challenges with the core systems required for complex manufacturing.	The integration of Infor LN with MES enhances its capabilities, particularly in complex manufacturing processes.
The last-mile capabilities required for manufacturing or industrial distribution may not as strong as purpose-built solutions such as Infor or Epicor but comparable to vanilla solutions such as SAP S/4 HANA.	Verticals such as automotive manufacturing demand deeper integration of PLM, CAD, and vendor portals to effectively manage their unique processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Acumatica emerges as a compelling choice among cloud-native ERP vendors, catering particularly to small and medium-sized businesses with its versatile capabilities. Positioned alongside NetSuite and Sage Intacct, Acumatica offers flexibility and multi-branch support, making it ideal for companies with revenues ranging from $10-100 million. However, it falls short in providing robust global operational features, limiting its suitability for companies with expansive international operations.

On the other hand, Infor CloudSuite LN surpasses entry-level ERP systems, offering mature capabilities tailored for intricate manufacturing and distribution operations. With a suite experience akin to SAP and Oracle, Infor LN delivers enterprise-grade functionalities across various modules such as PLM, WMS, WFM, and BI. While it excels in discrete manufacturing, it may face challenges in certain scenarios, particularly with process-centric operations.

Ultimately, the choice between Acumatica vs Infor CloudSuite LN hinges on a detailed examination of business requirements and operational needs. Both solutions offer distinct advantages and limitations, making this comparison an invaluable resource for organizations embarking on ERP selection projects. Thus, further exploration and evaluation are essential to determine the best-fit ERP solution for a company’s unique needs. Also, seeking assistance from an independent ERP consultant can significantly aid the decision-making process, offering specialized advice and direction tailored to the specific needs of the business.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

FAQs

What are the main differences between Acumatica and Infor CloudSuite LN?

Acumatica is designed for small to medium-sized businesses with revenues ranging from $10-100 million, offering flexible multi-branch capabilities suitable for manufacturing, distribution, construction, and field service operations. In contrast, Infor CloudSuite LN targets upper mid-market companies with revenues between $250M – $750M, providing mature capabilities for intricate manufacturing and distribution, and excelling particularly in discrete manufacturing sectors like Automotive, Aerospace, and High Tech.

Which companies are the ideal fit for Acumatica and Infor CloudSuite LN?

Acumatica is ideal for relatively smaller privately owned companies with limited global presence, particularly those in diverse manufacturing, construction, and distribution-centric operations. Infor CloudSuite LN is better suited for upper mid-market companies or as subsidiary solutions in a two-tier setting, especially for private equity-owned or holding companies in discrete manufacturing sectors such as Automotive, Aerospace, and High Tech.

How do Acumatica and Infor CloudSuite LN handle global capabilities and integration?

Acumatica has limited multi-entity and global operational capabilities, making it more suitable for companies operating primarily in the US and UK. In contrast, Infor CloudSuite LN offers robust global capabilities, including pre-integrated best-of-breed functionalities like HCM, PLM, WMS, TMS, and advanced supply chain planning, making it well-suited for complex global manufacturing operations.

Top 10 Companies Not Independent ERP Consultants In 2024

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Sam Gupta / June 5, 2024 May 27, 2024

“Independent” is the latest buzzword in the ERP industry. While many companies claim independence, not all fully comprehend how the independent ERP consulting business model works. In this blog, we will delve into the top 10 companies that are not independent ERP consultants, which constitutes a rather unique business model. So, let’s explore further.

In the realm of ERP projects, you’ll encounter various companies. It’s often amusing because some companies may sell their own software while asserting independence. Alternatively, there are scenarios where companies are affiliated with vendors yet claim independence despite reselling their software.

Top 10 Companies Not Independent ERP Consultants In 2024

Such claims may be supported by arguments that vendors don’t directly compensate them, hence claiming independence. However, when seeking an independent ERP consultant, it’s crucial to engage a vendor-agnostic consultant. Their lack of affiliation should be evident in their marketing materials. Therefore, paying attention to this distinction is imperative. This list aims to elucidate the diverse companies involved in the ERP industry and their differing approaches. Let’s examine the list now.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

10. Affiliate Marketing Companies

Business Model. When considering affiliate marketing companies, it’s important to note that they may not have affiliations with ERP vendors. However, their business model revolves around selling leads based on their content marketing authority. Typically lacking ERP implementation experience, they often echo the narratives provided by ERP vendors, relying on them for expertise.

Their Role with ERP Projects. During your ERP journey, you’ll encounter various affiliate marketing companies claiming to aid in vendor selection or RFP processes. However, their insights are often limited, particularly regarding implementation aspects such as integration design. This limitation frequently leads to ERP implementation issues.

Their Tendency to Underestimate the Expertise Required for ERP Selection. Even if the right product is identified, failure to define architecture during the selection phase or address change management issues can still result in complications. Therefore, it’s important to recognize that affiliate marketing companies do not necessarily offer the same independence as independent ERP consultants.

9. Supply Chain Consulting Companies

Business Model. Supply chain consulting companies are business consulting firms that specialize in supply chain operations. Their typical business model involves engaging with supply chain teams, delving deep into supply chain matters but not necessarily from an ERP perspective.

Their Limited Perspective and Potential Affiliation. While they may have utilized ERP systems and implemented supply chain processes within them, this doesn’t provide them with a comprehensive perspective combining all functions. Additionally, they may lack independence and could be affiliated with ERP, WMS, or CMS vendors, restricting their interactions to vendors within their ecosystem.

Their Tendency to Underestimate the Expertise Required for ERP Selection. Therefore, supply chain consulting companies may not always function as independent ERP consultants. They are suitable for addressing specific, departmental supply chain issues but may not be the best fit for defining ERP selection processes or aiding in ERP system selection and implementation. Their focus tends to be more on supply chain aspects, which may not suffice for comprehensive ERP needs.

8. Software Publishers or OEMs

Business Model. The business model for software publishers or OEMs revolves around selling licenses, with a primary focus on revenue generation through license sales. While they may assert having implementation expertise, their core objective is to sell licenses. Some OEMs may operate through their own reseller or consulting channels, but their primary goal remains license sales.

Free Advice Potentially Biased. As their profitability hinges on selling their software, they are inherently not independent. Despite claims of independence, OEMs may not exclusively specialize in ERP; they could also be ISV or e-commerce vendors. While they may offer assistance with ERP selection, their analyses typically favor their own products, processes, and methodologies.

Unspoken Alliances of the Enterprise Software World. It’s common for businesses to prioritize maintaining a good relationship with their OEMs, especially since they rely on their software. However, OEMs often recommend companies within their ecosystem or trusted channels, potentially limiting impartiality. Therefore, while businesses may collaborate with OEMs, they should recognize that OEMs do not function as independent ERP consultants.

7. Marketing Agencies

Business Model. Marketing agencies encompass various entities specializing in marketing, branding, SEO, and e-commerce. Typically, they collaborate with a company’s marketing department, promising extensive experience in enhancing sales through marketing efforts.

Their Limited Perspective and Affiliations. While they may offer assistance with ERP selection and implementation, their perspective often remains siloed, similar to supply chain consulting companies. Additionally, they may have affiliations with multiple vendors to promote alongside existing platforms, making them inherently non-independent.

Their True Expertise. It’s advisable to engage with marketing agencies when you need help with specific marketing challenges at the departmental level. However, they may not be the most suitable choice as an independent ERP consultant for ERP selection and implementation processes.

6. Executive Freelance Consultants

Business Model. Executive freelance consultants, often comprising former executives or board members, possess valuable industry experience, including ERP consulting.

Limited Cycles Under Their Belt. They may engage in freelance work during career transitions, seeking part-time or contract-based opportunities. Despite their expertise, they may lack extensive experience due to fewer engagement cycles and potential vendor affiliations, challenging their claims of being independent ERP consultants.

Insider Secrets Requires a “Rat”. Their business model may not prioritize ERP selection and implementation, limiting their understanding of industry dynamics, negotiation strategies, and risk mitigation. While they can offer valuable assistance in addressing specific business process issues, they may not be the optimal choice for ERP selection and implementation endeavors.

5. Lean Manufacturing Consultants

Business Model. Lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 consultants share similarities with marketing and supply chain consultants, as their focus tends to be biased towards shop floor manufacturing. While efficiency in manufacturing is crucial for success, it’s essential to recognize the importance of all departments in ERP projects.

Their Blind Spots. Ensuring representation of everyone’s interests, even if not equally, is vital to understanding how decisions impact workflows across the organization. Failure to conduct such analysis may lead to planning, forecasting, costing, integration, and reconciliation issues.

Their Superpowers. While these consultants specialize in lean processes, their ERP system experience varies. Even if they claim ERP implementation expertise, it’s crucial to consider the breadth of their experience. Collaborating with them is beneficial when addressing specific manufacturing or lean-related issues. However, they may not possess the expertise as an independent ERP consultant required for ERP selection and implementation.

4. System Integrators

Business Model. System integrators or the IT companies, are often perceived as having ERP expertise by companies unfamiliar with how the ERP industry operates. However, ERP requires specialized expertise that is distinct from general IT knowledge. System integrators typically operate similarly to ERP resellers, with partnerships with various providers and internal practices competing with each other.

Their Blind Spots. Despite potentially covering multiple ERP systems and process areas, their perspective may remain siloed. Sometimes companies rely upon IT consultants for IT procurement based on longstanding trust, with the hope of finding a system suitable for business processes. Generally, IT companies focus on technical aspects and may lack ERP expertise due to fewer engagement cycles and limited industry connections.

Their Superpowers. Consequently, they are not considered independent ERP consultants. They are best suited for addressing specific IT issues such as infrastructure, desktop security, or internal server procurement. However, they may not be the most suitable choice for ERP selection and implementation.

3. ERP Resellers

Business Model. ERP resellers, often ISVs, may portray themselves as independent despite representing various ERP systems. They may offer proof of concept or collaborate with other resellers to present multiple options during the selection process.

Free Advice Potentially Biased. However, their primary goal is to sell the systems they carry, leading to inherent bias in the selection process. While they may carry multiple products that might not be listed on their sights, their content strategy and evaluation approach can reveal their independence.

Their Blind Spots. Businesses should exercise caution when engaging with ERP resellers, focusing on product-specific expertise rather than broader areas like change management or system architecture. Independent ERP consultants are better suited for tasks requiring unbiased evaluation and identification of technology solutions.

2. Change/Project Management Consulting Firms

Business Model. Change or project management consulting firms come in various flavors, each offering a unique approach to change management. While change management is a broad concept, ERP projects demand deep ERP expertise, even within change management consulting firms.

Their Blind Spots. Given the constant evolution of ERP licensing, products, and technology, daily involvement in ERP-related activities is crucial. However, similar to freelance consultants or marketing agencies, these firms may lack awareness of industry dynamics and political forces, relying on technical vendors for ERP expertise. This reliance can lead to issues during ERP implementation, as vendors often present biased perspectives.

Their Affiliations. While change management consulting firms primarily focus on selling change management services, ERP change management differs significantly. Their independence may also be questionable due to potential affiliations with vendors. Evaluating their content strategy can shed light on their impartiality. Collaborating with these firms is advisable when seeking change management for simpler processes but may not be ideal for complex ERP transformations.

1. Accounting Fractional CFO Firms

Business Model. Accounting fractional CFO firms are often seen as the go-to for ERP systems due to their specialization in accounting and finance. However, similar to marketing agencies, lean consultants, or supply chain consulting firms, they may have a narrow focus, catering to specific areas.

Their Blind Spots. ERP systems aim to integrate all departments, requiring expertise across various domains. While accounting fractional CFO firms excel in financial reporting and analytics, they may overlook out-of-the-box ERP solutions, instead focusing on their services for revenue generation. Despite claiming independence, they may have affiliations with multiple vendors, aligning with their business model akin to resellers or system integrators.

Their Superpowers. Consequently, they may not be considered independent. Collaborating with them is advisable when seeking accounting-centric or finance-centric expertise. However, independent ERP consultants are better suited for ERP selection and implementation due to their broader expertise across departments.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ERP industry is filled with buzzwords like “independent,” but not all companies truly grasp the nuances of independent ERP consulting. This blog has shed light on top 10 companies that may not fit the bill of independent ERP consultants, highlighting their unique business models. From affiliate marketing companies to accounting fractional CFO firms, each entity brings its own perspective to the table, but they may not necessarily offer the impartiality needed for ERP selection and implementation.

While these companies may excel in specific areas like marketing, supply chain, or accounting, their focus tends to be siloed, overlooking the comprehensive needs of ERP projects. Despite claims of independence, affiliations with vendors and biases in product promotion may undermine their credibility as independent consultants.

Therefore, businesses embarking on ERP projects should tread carefully when engaging with these entities, recognizing their strengths and limitations. While they may offer valuable expertise in their respective domains, independent ERP consultants remain the optimal choice for navigating the complexities of ERP selection and implementation. With their vendor-agnostic approach and comprehensive industry knowledge, independent consultants ensure unbiased evaluation and implementation of ERP systems, ultimately leading to successful ERP projects.

FAQs

What defines an independent ERP consultant, and why is independence important?

An independent ERP consultant is a professional or firm that operates without any affiliations or biases towards specific ERP vendors. Independence is crucial because it ensures that the consultant’s recommendations are based solely on the client’s needs and the suitability of the ERP system, rather than on any potential financial incentives or partnerships with software vendors. This impartiality helps businesses receive objective advice tailored to their specific requirements.

How can businesses identify if a consulting firm is truly independent?

Businesses can identify independent consulting firms by examining their marketing materials and business practices. True independent consultants will emphasize their vendor-agnostic approach and lack of affiliations with ERP vendors. Additionally, they will not push for specific software solutions based on any hidden agendas. Transparency about their business model and how they maintain impartiality in their recommendations is also a good indicator of independence.

What are the risks of hiring a non-independent ERP consultant?

Hiring a non-independent ERP consultant can lead to several risks, including biased recommendations that favor certain vendors regardless of the best fit for your business, potential conflicts of interest, and a lack of comprehensive evaluation of all available options. This can result in selecting an ERP system that may not fully meet your business needs, leading to implementation challenges, higher costs, and ultimately, suboptimal performance of the ERP system. It’s essential to ensure your consultant’s advice is unbiased to avoid these pitfalls.

Top 10 ERP Governance Processes for Implementation Integrity

Leave a Comment / Blog, Enterprise Architecture, ERP / By Sam Gupta / June 3, 2024 May 27, 2024

ERP is a powerful technology, but it’s generally not one system for all your problems. Even if you have a state-of-the-art ERP selection and ERP implementation, you might still run into issues unless you have the ERP governance processes. So, what are the top 10 ERP governance processes that maintain ERP implementation integrity?

Commonly, companies approach ERP implementation and ERP selection with the belief that hiring consultants will suffice to navigate the complexities of the new system. They anticipate a smooth implementation process with a minimal strategy selection phase and post-implementation involvement. They might also think that once the implementation is done, they might not need guidance from the consultants.

Top 10 ERP Governance Processes for Implementation Integrity

However, this approach might pose challenges, especially in managing internal operations without well-defined ERP governance processes or a center of excellence overseeing master data governance. Without proper ERP governance processes, even the most advanced implementation might run the risk of derailment due to data inconsistencies.

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Download Now

10. Replenishment Strategies

Make-to-order vs Make-to-stock. Traditional replenishment strategies, such as make-to-order vs make-to-stock, could have a substantial impact on your ERP selection and implementation. Just because you have structured your processes as make-to-order and are able to run your business fine with this strategy doesn’t mean that it would be an optimal strategy for your future implementation. These configurations could also vary per product category. Companies, with poorly implemented ERP systems, struggle to differentiate between such strategies, leading to misconfigurations based on a limited understanding of the system.

Implications of Mix-up. The distinction between strategies such as make-to-order and make-to-stock isn’t always clear-cut, often resulting in grey areas. Mixing these approaches can cause issues with lead times, process tracking, and lead time calculations by the system, necessitating numerous modifications and extra steps to achieve accurate planning before releasing production orders.

Process Governance Meaningful Even Post Implementation. Effective ERP governance processes for replenishment strategies are essential, even post-implementation. Clear guidelines must be established for setting up product data, replenishment algorithms, and SKU correlation with the warehouse. Without proper governance, a multitude of issues may arise, impacting operational efficiency and overall performance.

9. Warehouse vs Warehouse Locations

The Blurred Lines of Physical and Digital Operations. This requires a deeper understanding of the ERP data model. While some companies grasp it, others may not, leading to a mix-up in interpretation among users. This confusion often extends to distinguishing between a warehouse and a warehouse location.

Implications of this Mix-up. Such ambiguity can cause significant planning challenges. Therefore, clear ERP governance processes defining what constitutes a warehouse and how it is defined are essential. Additionally, confusion might also arise when labeling something as a warehouse without it being a physical facility. Given these complexities, sound judgment is necessary. Without clear guidelines on warehouse definition and identification, even a state-of-the-art ERP implementation may encounter issues post-implementation.

8. Item Attributes

They are like Sugar, Requiring Judgment. Item attributes often cause issues, especially when there are unclear guidelines regarding what constitutes an attribute and how to incorporate details into the item model. Within ERP systems, distinguishing between attributes and non-attributes is often a delicate matter, with implications for planning, costing, and integration with other systems.

Implications of this Mix-up. Therefore, ERP governance processes for item attributes are crucial, defining what qualifies as an attribute and when to consider it, particularly during product launches. While determining whether something is an attribute can be challenging, clear guidelines are essential to avoid potential problems. Without such guidelines, issues are likely to arise.

7. Rework

Shortcuts aren’t as Clever with Rework. Rework is a significant process within production, and its handling should ideally be straightforward. However, companies often encounter challenges when incorporating rework into their BOMs. When rework is inconsistently labeled as a routing step or explicitly identified as rework across different processes, it can lead to numerous issues throughout production and procurement.

Implications of this Mix-up. To mitigate these challenges, ERP governance processes surrounding rework are crucial. Defining rework clearly and consistently is paramount. Establishing documented workflows, ensuring compliance, and implementing approval processes specific to rework can significantly enhance the integrity of ERP implementations.

6. Revision Number

The Subtle Art of Mastering Revision Numbers. The management of revision numbers within your data model can vary significantly. Sometimes revisions are recorded separately, while other times multiple names may be included within a single revision number. Additionally, the handling of revision numbers may depend on the user’s level of expertise with the products being used. This underscores the importance of training, compliance, and governance. It’s essential to monitor how teams handle this aspect, especially for new hires, for at least six months.

Implications of this Mix-up. Clear guidelines regarding when to use revision numbers are crucial. Implementing control workflows and restricting access to individuals who are more knowledgeable about the ERP system can prevent many headaches. However, mishandling revision numbers often leads to integrity issues during ERP implementation. Therefore, ERP governance processes surrounding revision numbers are paramount to ensure the system functions effectively and accurately reflects the organization’s data.

5. BOMs

The Bill of “Migraines.” BOMs drive numerous governance issues, particularly in defining work orders versus routing steps, or distinguishing between engineering BOMs and production BOMs. These issues can significantly impact the integrity of ERP implementation. Maintaining this integrity is crucial, regardless of whether it’s been six months or a year since implementation.

Implications of this Mix-up. Control over these aspects must always be upheld once BOMs are integrated into the recall process. Once they’re transferred to customers, who may utilize serial numbers, altering the BOM’s state becomes challenging. Hence, clear guidelines on ERP governance processes surrounding BOM design and workflows are extremely critical for maintaining ERP implementation integrity.

4. Unit of Measures

The Unpleasant Toll of Misconfigured UoMs. Unit of measures significantly influences various aspects. Sometimes, companies might not prioritize units of measures adequately. They might organize them as separate SKUs or incorporate them as drop-down options on forms, as that aligns with technical understanding of requirements. However, unit of measure necessitates modeling data according to its structure and how units are procured, consumed, and sold.

Implications of this Mix-up. Proper modeling is crucial; failure to do so or to maintain ERP implementation integrity can lead to adverse effects. Mixing these schemes will likely result in planning and scheduling issues wherever these units of measures are utilized. Thus, ERP governance processes surrounding unit of measures are important for maintaining ERP implementation integrity.

3. SKU Number

Intelligent SKUs aren’t as intelligent. Clear guidelines regarding SKU numbers are essential. Opting for autogenerated SKU numbers is typically the best approach as it simplifies maintenance. Autogenerated SKUs eliminate debates about what can or cannot be included in the SKU number. Legacy systems may not support automated SKU generation, or if they do, the utility might not be seamlessly integrated with SKU numbers.

Implications of this Mix-up. This disconnect can lead to issues, especially if an external add-on or utility is used for generation but cannot enforce SKU numbers on the product master itself. Additionally, modeling SKU numbers to accommodate variance in configurable inventory can pose challenges. Thus, ERP governance processes over SKU numbers are crucial for post-ERP implementation integrity.

2. Vendor Master Relationship

New Hand, New Version of the Same Vendor. You’ll encounter numerous challenges regarding vendor master relationships, as they are frequently updated. Unlike unit of measures or item attributes, which may not undergo frequent changes, the vendor master data is subject to frequent updates, especially considering the number of vendors involved in the process. Many individuals are responsible for maintaining vendors and may argue that centralized control slows down their operations. However, granting them control can lead to inconsistencies and break the implementation’s integrity.

Implications of this Mix-up. Common issues arise regarding how shipping tools and vendors are captured, sometimes resulting in confusion between ship-to addresses and vendor details. Additionally, decisions regarding whether vendors also serve as customers or employees impact ERP planning. Therefore, implementing ERP governance processes for vendor setup is essential to ensure smooth operations.

1. Customer Master Relationship

Customer Master is as Crucial as Your Customers. Similar to vendor master data, customer master data encounters comparable challenges, with complexity varying depending on the organization’s specific circumstances. Some companies may have millions of customers but fewer vendors, while others may have the opposite scenario. Regardless, complexity of both customer and vendor master data influences operations. Issues arise when incorporating buying groups into the customer master model, especially if assumptions are made without aligning with the ERP data model, leading to planning complications.

Implications of this Mix-up. Sometimes, issues may not manifest immediately, potentially going unnoticed during testing. Overlooking consultant advice on setup complexity can exacerbate issues later on. Despite consultants recommending a certain setup, some organizations may perceive it as overly complicated and opt for a simpler approach, only to encounter issues afterward. Therefore, careful consideration and alignment with ERP data models are essential to avoid complications down the line.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Download Now

Conclusion

In conclusion, while ERP technology offers immense potential for streamlining operations, its successful implementation requires more than just cutting-edge software and consultants’ expertise. The governance processes surrounding ERP systems, including master data management and operational protocols, are paramount for maintaining implementation integrity. The top 10 ERP governance processes highlighted in this blog underscore the importance of clear guidelines, consistency, and alignment with organizational needs and ERP data models.

Whether it’s managing vendor and customer master relationships, defining SKU numbers, or ensuring accuracy in unit of measures and BOMs, robust ERP governance processes are essential for mitigating risks and ensuring smooth operations post-implementation. Without these governance mechanisms in place, even the most advanced ERP systems are susceptible to data inconsistencies, planning challenges, and operational disruptions. Therefore, organizations must prioritize establishing and adhering to ERP governance processes to maximize the benefits of their ERP investments and drive long-term success. While this blog provides helpful insights, consulting an independent ERP consultant can significantly improve your implementation outcomes.

FAQs

Why are ERP governance processes important for successful ERP implementation?

ERP governance processes are crucial for maintaining the integrity of ERP implementations by ensuring consistency and accuracy in data management. Without these processes, even the most advanced ERP systems can encounter issues like data inconsistencies and operational disruptions, leading to challenges in planning and overall performance.

What are some common issues companies face without proper ERP governance?

Without proper ERP governance, companies may struggle with data inconsistencies, such as misconfigured replenishment strategies, unclear item attributes, and improper handling of revision numbers. These issues can lead to planning challenges, inefficiencies in production processes, and overall operational disruptions, undermining the effectiveness of the ERP system.

How does managing vendor and customer master data impact ERP implementation?

Managing vendor and customer master data is critical as these datasets frequently change and require careful oversight. Poor management can lead to inconsistencies, planning complications, and operational inefficiencies. Clear ERP governance processes for setting up and maintaining vendor and customer master data help ensure smooth operations and maintain the integrity of the ERP implementation.

Featured Case Study

Featured Resource

Featured Video

Featured Resource

Featured Case Study

Featured Resource

Featured Video

Featured Resource

Featured Case Study

Featured Resource

Featured Video

Featured Resource

ERP

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Criteria

10. Plex

Strengths

Weaknesses

9. DELMIAWorks

Strengths

Weaknesses

8. QAD

Strengths

Weaknesses

7. Oracle Cloud ERP

Strengths

Weaknesses

6. Acumatica

Strengths

Weaknesses

5. SAP S/4 HANA

Strengths

Weaknesses

4. Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O

Strengths

Weaknesses

3. Infor CloudSuite Industrial (Syteline)

Strengths

Weaknesses

2. Epicor Kinetic

Strengths

Weaknesses

1. Infor CloudSuite LN

Strengths

Weaknesses

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Conclusion

FAQs

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

What is MS Dynamics 365 Business Central?

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

MS BC vs Infor LN Comparison

MS BC vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Financial Management Comparison

Supply Chain Management Comparison

Manufacturing Management Comparison

Pros of MS BC vs Infor LN

Cons of MS BC vs Infor LN

Conclusion

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

FAQs

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

What is Oracle Cloud ERP?

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN Comparison

Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Financial Management Comparison

Supply Chain Management Comparison

Manufacturing Management Comparison

Pros of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN

Cons of Oracle Cloud ERP vs Infor LN

Conclusion

+ ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

FAQs

The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

What is SAP S/4 HANA?

What Is Infor CloudSuite LN?

SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN Comparison

SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor LN Feature Comparison

Financial Management Comparison

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery