Enterprise Architecture

This category contains articles related to enterprise architecture concepts. It touches enterprise architecture from many different perspectives including the conceptual understanding of the architecture, systems that need to be part of the architecture, and integration issues with best-of-breed architecture.

Top 4 ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

What is inventory? Inventory can be anything that has a financial value. It can be a product or a service. It is anything and everything that goes on your sales order or purchase order. Now, the second task is to manage your inventory efficiently. Before you know about efficient ERP inventory management best practices, let’s discuss the importance of coded inventory i.e. SKUs.

The Importance of Coded Inventory

So, when you look at your sales order, there will be a bunch of headers and product lines. The product lines are entered by SKUs. The whole idea of SKU is that once you have the ID, you grab the whole product information. You are bundling every single piece of information related to that product under that SKU. 

Top 4 ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

Now, when you look at SKU, obviously there will be SKU numbers along with a lot of different layers. These layers can be either dependent or independent. Let’s understand this with an example. Suppose we have four different SKUs – 1100, 1101, 1102, and 1103 which are independent. Each SKU will further have multiple data points. Suppose the SKU number 1100 has 2000 different data points. What are these data points on the inventory level? These data points are going to be everything that defines that particular inventory, for example, a lot number. 

The whole intent of keeping information bundled up is to make sure that your data entry is simplified. Let’s say you want to use this product anywhere in your system or any process. There are going to be 1000 to 2000 data points associated with each SKU. It could be weight, dimension, lot number, or any other attribute related to the product. If you have to enter 2000 different data points, you are going to go crazy. Therefore, you need some sort of description of your inventory that you can grab quickly.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Advanced Inventory Types

The way you model these SKUs defines what result you are going to get out of your ERP. Therefore, product modeling is very critical here. Now that we have cleared the basics, let’s dive into types of inventory. There are three kinds of inventory: dimensional inventory, piece inventory, and matrix inventory. Understanding each of them is important as it will make both your ERP selection and ERP implementation easier. Using an ERP system that does not support any one type of inventory might result in planning issues. It might also result in ad-hoc processes and increased admin effort in correlating dimensions on top of raw data.

1. Matrix Inventory

Let’s understand this concept with an example. Suppose there are two shoes and the only difference in the production perspective between them is the pigment used. One is black and the other is red. The way the manufacturing process works is how you organize the information. You reutilize as much as possible. The more you reutilize, the more financial efficiencies you are going to get from the process. So, these shoes could be manufactured in the same way as all their pieces except when it comes to mixing the pigment. But suppose now you want to change the assembly process for the black shoe.

You have to probably go to every black shoe variant and change this information as the data is not interconnected. This becomes a huge problem in industries like fashion and apparel where the demand is driven by style, season, etc. That’s where matrix inventory comes in handy. The whole intent of matrix inventory is to reutilize the information as much as possible by organizing it differently. As the name suggests it is planned exactly like a matrix.

The base SKU remains the same, but you can have other attributes like color, size, etc related to it. Because of this reason, the data related to the SKU is interconnected. So anytime there is going to be a change in the foundational SKU you are not necessarily going to multiple places and changing that.

2. Dimensional Inventory

The problems and intent of dimensional and matrix inventory are very much similar with few differences. Let’s understand this with two examples. So, whenever you go to a grocery store, you can scan a barcode and it gives all the details of the SKU. Let’s say you have chicken in the meat section of the store. Chicken no. 1 with SKU 1101, chicken no. 2 with SKU 1102, etc. These are very similar chickens with the only difference of the dimension – weight. Now, if the SKU of these chickens is not blended with the dimension weight, you cannot sell it. This is because you need to know this information while packaging when sold and charge the customers accordingly. 

Now, for the second example. Let’s say you have a sheet metal and you are trying to cut it into different pieces of different dimensions for car manufacturing. The sheet metal will have an SKU, and so will each of its parts. But just the SKU won’t be enough and you are going to need some sort of attributes to be able to plan at the attribute level. So you are going to create some sort of attribute here, like heat number, and plan the inventory accordingly. It is similar to how the matrix inventory works in the retail industry but won’t have as many permutations and combinations as there are in retail. 

3. Piece Inventory

Piece inventory comes in continuation of the dimensional inventory. Let’s take the same example of the sheet metal mentioned above. Now let’s say after entering the dimensions, you need the machine to cut the sheet metal into ten different pieces. But logically the machine can only cut the sheet metal into twelve pieces and not ten. So now, you have to decide what you do with those two pieces. What are the possibilities? One possibility is that you can simply throw it in the scrap. If you throw there is a financial value attached to it, which will make your pieces far more expensive. Another possibility could be you put these two extra pieces for some next job. Now this decision might create friction as it affects the entire production line. 

This is where piece inventory should be planned. What do you do with these pieces? How do you organize these pieces? There is a functionality inside ERP in which once pieces are recognized, you have some flexibility in how they will be accounted for. So when you define this nesting process, the system already knows that it is going to create these two extra pieces. So whatever you define in this part of the algorithm, you can define them in advance so that you don’t have to impact your production process. 

ERP Inventory Management Best Practices

Now that you know the difference between these three types of inventory it will help you design your inventory accordingly. Based on the industry types this will help in devising the ERP inventory management best practices for maximum financial efficiency. Below are the top 4 ERP inventory management best practices that you should always keep in mind before you design your inventory. 

1. Mimic The Physical Process

Designing inventory systems that closely mirror the physical manufacturing process is one of the fundamental ERP inventory management best practices. By aligning the digital representation of inventory with its real-world counterpart, you can ensure seamless integration and a more accurate reflection of your operational reality. This strategy involves breaking down the manufacturing process into modular components, just as you would in the physical production of goods.

The goal here is to replicate and optimize the flow of materials and products throughout the entire supply chain. By doing so, you can identify bottlenecks, streamline workflows, and maximize resource utilization. This approach not only enhances efficiency but also minimizes discrepancies between digital records and the actual state of inventory, ultimately leading to more accurate forecasting and planning.

2. Balancing Data Entry

Balancing data entry from the user’s perspective is one of the critical ERP inventory management best practices. It ensures the accuracy and reliability of inventory information. While it’s essential to capture comprehensive data for each inventory item, a balanced approach avoids unnecessary complexity that may arise from overloading the system with redundant information. Prioritizing user-friendly data entry methods not only reduces the risk of errors but also enhances the speed of data input.

You should aim to strike a balance between collecting essential information for effective inventory management and ensuring that the data entry process remains intuitive for users. This strategy helps maintain data accuracy, streamlines processes and facilitates smoother collaboration among your teams involved in inventory management.

3. Expert Review of SKU Design

Engaging independent ERP consultants to review and optimize your SKU design aligned with ERP planning is one of the most effective ERP inventory management best practices. SKU design goes beyond mere identification codes; it involves structuring product information in a way that aligns with the broader goals of the ERP system. Subject matter experts in the field can provide valuable insights into industry best practices, ensuring that SKU design maximizes the capabilities of the ERP platform. This strategy involves considering not only current operational needs but also anticipating future requirements. Through expert review, you can fine-tune your SKU design to enhance scalability, flexibility, and overall adaptability to evolving market demands.

4. Multiple Rounds of Testing During ERP Implementation

Conducting multiple rounds of testing during the ERP implementation is considered crucial as one of the ERP inventory management best practices. This process involves simulating real-world scenarios to ensure that the inventory module functions effectively and aligns with the specific needs of the business. Testing helps identify potential issues, discrepancies, or inefficiencies before the system is fully deployed, reducing the risk of disruptions to day-to-day operations.

Independent ERP consultants play a critical role in this strategy by leveraging their knowledge to anticipate future requirements and forecast potential risks. Rigorous testing not only validates the functionality of the inventory module but also provides valuable insights into system performance, helping you to make informed decisions and adjustments before the ERP system becomes an integral part of your operational infrastructure.

Conclusion

If you are looking to implement ERP inventory management best practices, you must understand the type of inventory you need to design based on your industry.  Each of them has its own merits when utilized efficiently for the desired results from the ERP systems. The whole intent here is to figure out what is the best way to organize the SKUs of your inventory. Understanding these concepts will also help reduce manual data entry, which reduces time spent on SKU maintenance and ultimately helps increase the financial margins. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

FAQs

NetSuite ERP Independent Review 2024

What Is NetSuite ERP? NetSuite ERP is a powerful cloud-based ERP solution that empowers small to mid-sized businesses looking for a diverse cloud-native option particularly relying on add-ons for deep operational capabilities. Offering core ERP capabilities relevant to many industries, NetSuite ERP especially caters to modules spanning financial management, distribution, CRM, and supply chain management.

With the data model being friendly it is uniquely strong for industries especially hospitality, retail, and commerce-centric industries. In comparison with other cloud-native solutions that might be either weaker in their deep operational or broader capabilities, NetSuite ERP provides the best of both worlds for diverse organizations seeking a scalable solution that could scale with their business model and global growth.

Top 8 NetSuite Independent Review Insights


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Key Review Insights

1. Global Expansion and Subsidiary Management

NetSuite ERP has a robust capability to handle operations across 200 subsidiaries. Thus, proves to be a testament to its prowess in global expansion. The platform provides centralized control, enabling businesses to efficiently manage operations in various countries or subsidiaries in one database. NetSuite’s multi-entity support ensures that businesses can manage diverse entities with distinct financial structures seamlessly. Companies with multiple subsidiaries find value in the centralized control offered by NetSuite ERP especially fostering efficiency in managing operations across borders.

2. Deep Finance Capabilities

NetSuite ERP solution incorporates vital functionalities, particularly record-to-report (R2R), procure-to-pay (P2P), order-to-cash (OTC), fixed asset management (FAM), and services resource planning (SRP). Thus, providing the basic ERP capabilities for most industries, which need to be augmented by the add-ons provided through third-party add-ons. R2R ensures accuracy in financial reporting, P2P optimizes procurement processes, OTC manages the entire sales cycle, FAM efficiently handles fixed assets, and SRP enhances service-oriented businesses.

3. Best for Audit-ready SMBs

Role access control is a pivotal aspect of NetSuite ERP, offering companies the ability to define and manage user roles for audit-ready SMBs. The audit layers might not be as intuitive as larger ERP systems that might provide visual transactional maps but NetSuite ERP provides enough details for SMBs with the log of changes with each business object for easier traceability.

4. Scalable Solution for SMBs

Due to its diversified support for most business models that could also be augmented through the marketplace, it might take a while before SMBs outgrow NetSuite. The solutions that target specific business models or processes struggle with businesses that might be growing faster or might be active with M&A cycles.

5. eCommerce Friendly

NetSuite ERP demonstrates suitability for retail companies, with the marketplace options prevalent with eCommerce-centric operations and data models aligned for these companies, especially when it comes to integration options with many different channels and omnichannel architecture. However, cautionary notes arise for medical device companies, where user experiences highlight potential limitations in meeting specific industry needs. Industry-specific recommendations emphasize the importance of considering NetSuite ERP based on the unique requirements of each business.

6. Strong CRM Capabilities

Businesses benefit from a seamless CRM integration, especially if they are not planning to use a third-party best-of-breed solution, for which the integration might be cost-prohibitive. The Netsuite CRM can support several advanced capabilities, such as territory planning sales comp for complex channels, capabilities commonly found in mature CRM systems.

7. Vibrant Marketplace

NetSuite ERP has perhaps the most vibrant marketplace across the ecosystems, especially friendly for their core industries. Most cloud-native ISVs, such as vendor collaboration, WMS, or TMS software that might not be available with other ERP ecosystems, are available with NetSuite. This is a huge plus for businesses with diversified business models or companies that might have expectations to diversify in the near future as part of their growth.

8. Weaker for Industrial Companies

NetSuite’s manufacturing functionality comes under scrutiny, with user feedback expressing concerns about perceived depth. User concerns have shed light on potential limitations, prompting considerations for businesses with manufacturing needs. Businesses with manufacturing requirements need to carefully evaluate NetSuite ERP’s capabilities to ensure they align with the depth and complexity demanded by their operations.

Key Features of NetSuite ERP

  1. Sales Order Management: It efficiently manages sales order types of different business models. It is also integrated with finance and fulfillment for end-to-end traceability.
  2. Sourcing and Procurement: It has a centralized supply portal that ensures compliance in the purchasing process. It also includes forecasting abilities that can recalculate predictions based on actual fluctuations.
  3. Warehouse Management: It streamlines warehouse operations, decreasing overhead and cycle times. This feature also enhances on-time delivery rates, improving customer retention and boosting revenue.
  4. Production Management: This feature has basic production management capabilities, ideal for assembly-centric operations. It can be augmented by more mature solutions through third-party add-ons for richer industrial capabilities.
  5. Accounting: It has comprehensive accounting features, covering invoicing, forecasting, and aiding in tax calculations based on factors like location and revenue.

Pros and Cons of NetSuite ERP

ProsCons
1. Ideal for SMBs operating in many countries.1. Not fit for companies operating only in a few countries. Also, those looking for deeper operational capabilities provided as part of the suite and owned by OEM.
2. Cloud-native technology provides richer cloud capabilities, such as enterprise search and mobile capabilities, that might be weaker than other solutions.2. Not the best fit for companies for which operational capabilities might be a bigger critical success factor than cloud-native features.
3. Ideal for publicly traded and audit-ready companies because of the built-in SOX compliance capabilities.3. Not ideal for startups with simpler operating models. They might find audit-centric and deep financial capabilities over-bloated.
4. Ideal for service-centric SMBs because of the integrated PSA, HCM processes, and subscription billing. 4. Not fit for industrial companies looking for deep operational capabilities built as part of the core solution.
5. Ideal for eCommerce-centric SMBs because the pre-integrated add-ons and data models are friendlier for these industries.5. Not fit for companies deep into B2B workflows because the pricing, discounting, and product models are not scalable.
6. Ideal for holding and private equity companies looking to host diverse business models on one solution.6. Not fit for companies without expected changes in the business model in the near future.
7. Ideal for companies looking for talent available in most countries.7. The experience with support might vary depending on the vendors involved with the engagement.
8. Ideal for companies looking to find best-of-breed tools and can’t replace edge solutions mandated by the OEM.8. Not fit for companies seeking OEM-owned integration with core operational systems such as CAD or PLM.

Conclusion

In summary, NetSuite ERP stands as a robust and versatile cloud-based ERP solution. It provides businesses with the automation and centralization needed for efficient operations. Offering a comprehensive suite of functionalities, from financial management to distribution and CRM, NetSuite ERP proves flexible and adaptable. 

However, careful consideration is crucial, particularly for businesses with complex operational needs. NetSuite’s strengths in global expansion, core functionalities, CRM capabilities, third-party integrations and add-ons make it an excellent choice for SMB businesses. Especially in the retail, hospitality, and service-centric industries. Yet, users must navigate potential pitfalls, such as limited operational capabilities, reliance on third-party add-ons, and challenges for smaller implementations. In evaluating NetSuite ERP, understanding its key features, pros, and cons becomes imperative. This ensures alignment with the unique operational requirements of each business. This NetSuite ERP independent review intends to provide you with unbiased insights for further discussion with your independent ERP consultants.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

FAQs

Top 10 ERP Pricing Implementation Considerations - Cover

Top 10 ERP Pricing Implementation Considerations

ERP pricing implementation is not as easy. It brings forth many challenges. Some of them include managing and integrating vast amounts of pricing data, ensuring pricing consistency across various platforms, keeping pricing information up-to-date in real time, staying compliant with industry regulations, and so on. The list goes on. When it comes to pricing, ERP systems have several business rules at various levels. And understanding the nuances of these layers is crucial for pricing to work as your expectations.

When we talk about ERP pricing implementation, it helps in supporting complex pricing structures and provides the users with the most accurate experiences. It creates a seamless experience between operations and customer experiences. Enabling ERP pricing implementation means customers are receiving the most accurate pricing data that helps them with their purchase decisions. Businesses also gain the freedom to tier their pricing and discounts catered to certain customers and manage their sales. This blog delves into the top 10 ERP pricing implementation considerations. 

Top 10 ERP Pricing Implementation Considerations - Infographic


The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

1. Product Portfolio

While ERP pricing implementation, one of the critical factors that can significantly impact the integration is the intricacy of your product portfolio. For example, a company will face multiple challenges if it has a diverse product range. The need for multiple pricing tiers arises when dealing with various products, especially customizable ones. In this case, the company will have to publish the pricing in the market configure pricing in the ERP system, and e-commerce pricing. The result will be a complex web of pricing structures, leading to confusion in customer-facing situations.

The customer’s ordering experience will become a puzzle. This is because pricing depends on the channel through which the opportunity flows into the system. This will create challenges in managing repeat orders and introduce manual processes, making consistency a rare commodity. The lesson learned here is clear. When navigating the ERP pricing implementation, it’s crucial to streamline and simplify your product portfolio.

Strategies to Simplify Product Portfolios
  • Assess the performance of each product, identify the top-performing products, and consider phasing out those that contribute minimally to revenue.
  • Concentrate on your core products that align with your brand identity and meet the primary needs of your target audience.
  • Identify and eliminate redundant or overlapping products that serve similar purposes. 
  • Listen to customer feedback and analyze demand patterns. Use this information to prioritize products that are in high demand.
  • Regularly review the lifecycle of each product. Consider discontinuing products that are at the end of their lifecycle and invest in innovation for new ones.
  • Create bundled offerings or packages that group related products together. This not only simplifies the purchasing decision for customers but also helps in promoting specific product combinations.

2. Pricing Dynamics

When we talk about pricing dynamics, several factors come into play, each influencing the cost structure and strategies employed by distributors and manufacturers. Understanding and navigating these diverse pricing dynamics are crucial during ERP pricing implementation. This understanding enables effective configuration of the ERP systems to accommodate different pricing structures. It also helps align them with the specific needs of the business. It also ensures pricing data accuracy and consistency within the ERP system. Businesses can adopt more customer-centric pricing strategies when they understand the pricing dynamics properly. They stay adaptable to market changes or shifts in demands and competition.

Key Dimensions in the Pricing Equation
  • Base Pricing. The foundation of any pricing strategy is the base pricing set by the distributor or manufacturer. This serves as the initial benchmark for products, reflecting their inherent value and influencing subsequent pricing adjustments.
  • Warehouse-Based Pricing. Introducing another layer of complexity, warehouse-based pricing depends on the geographical location of a warehouse. The same product may be priced differently based on the region or country where the warehouse is situated. This dynamic is driven by logistical considerations, regional cost variations, and market demands specific to each location.
  • Customer-Based Pricing. Adopting a customer-based approach, products are priced differently depending on the target audience. For retail customers, prices factor in elements like demand, competition, and perceived value for end consumers. Distribution customers, purchasing in bulk, face a different pricing structure. Manufacturers or distributors need to consider providing margins to accommodate the larger volumes bought by distributors, aligning pricing strategies with the distinct needs and purchasing behaviors of various customer segments.
  • Seasonal or Event-Based Pricing. Introducing a temporal dimension to the pricing equation, seasonal or event-based pricing strategies mean products may be priced differently during specific seasons, festivals, or events. This reflects the fluctuating demand and market dynamics tied to these timeframes.

3. Forms of Discounting

Discounting serves as a strategic layer atop the pricing structure, offering businesses a nuanced approach to adjust product costs and respond to various market dynamics. The ways that different forms of discounting affect the ERP pricing implementation are similar to how the pricing dynamics affect it. But there are some additions to it. Understanding this concept also helps businesses optimize costs in response to regional market demands. It helps in customer segmentation for more personalized and effective pricing. 

Key Dimensions in the Discounting Framework
  • Base Discount. Applying a percentage reduction to the foundational base pricing, the base discount serves as a dynamic tool. It allows businesses to maintain a clear baseline for product values while introducing flexibility and responsiveness to market conditions, ensuring competitiveness without compromising perceived product value.
  • Location-Based Discounts. Providing an additional dimension to the discounting framework, location-based discounts optimize costs in response to regional market demands. These discounts tailor pricing strategies to specific warehouse locations, addressing pricing variations influenced by logistical, operational, or market-specific considerations.
  • Customer-Based Discounts. Extending adaptability to different customer segments, customer-based discounts cater to the unique needs of retail and distribution customers. This approach allows businesses to foster stronger relationships, enhance market penetration, and customize pricing for individual and bulk purchases.
  • Event-Based Discounts. Tied to seasons, festivals, or specific occasions, event-based discounts introduce a time-sensitive element. This dynamic enables businesses to align pricing strategies with the pulse of the market during specific periods, providing the agility to respond effectively to changing market dynamics.

4. Distribution Channels

Industries operating through multiple distribution channels, involving layers like manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, face unique challenges in devising pricing strategies. Each channel requires tailored pricing structures to address the distinct needs of intermediaries and end customers. This complexity is heightened without a unified pricing management system, making navigating and managing diverse pricing models effectively challenging. This disparity necessitates centralized control for effective management, especially considering the underlying thread of inventory that ties everything together. 

5. Regulatory Challenges

Companies in sectors like healthcare, finance, or pharmaceuticals are bound by stringent regulations that significantly influence pricing strategies. Regulatory requirements may demand transparency in pricing, impose controls on pricing structures, or mandate compliance with specific pricing guidelines. Navigating these regulatory intricacies while maintaining competitive pricing adds complexity for businesses. As businesses strive for a unified and consistent pricing approach, navigating the regulatory landscape becomes critical to successful ERP pricing implementation.

6. Source of Truth

Ensuring a seamless ERP pricing implementation hinges on having a single, authoritative source of truth for pricing data. The ERP system emerges as this bedrock, embodying the most current and accurate pricing information. An architectural approach is often advocated that minimizes manual touches and ensures the fewest number of interactions. The crux lies in understanding the internal implications and how the architecture aligns with customer needs.

Despite potential organizational resistance, establishing the ERP as the unambiguous source of truth is the key to internal and external satisfaction. The critical role of the ERP system in pricing integration is magnified, particularly in contrast to the pitfalls of relying on third-party systems or maintaining pricing information in disparate locations. This narrative reinforces the need for a centralized control mechanism, emphasizing the ERP as the linchpin for consistent and accurate pricing across diverse channels.

7. Data Silos

A critical factor demanding attention is the emergence of data silos when utilizing pricing software or external tools, especially in contexts involving dynamic pricing or intricate formulas. A centralized source of truth is of utmost importance to prevent the potential pitfalls of neglecting consistent auditing within the ERP. The pricing information residing in various channels such as published pricing in the market, ERP-configured pricing, and e-commerce pricing, introduces challenges in maintaining consistency and accuracy, particularly when dealing with repeat orders from different channels.

8. Complexity of CPQ

Integrating CPQ systems requires extensive product details, customer information, and pricing data. Notably, sales and marketing teams resist direct engagement with ERP systems for quoting, further complicating the integration process. The inherent complexity of CPQ systems demands meticulous integration work, creating two-way loops within the ERP architecture. This further underscores the critical importance of addressing the challenges posed by CPQ integration to ensure a streamlined and efficient ERP implementation.

Some of these complexities involve data inconsistencies, the need to handle things externally, and the importance of having a structured pricing process. While there may be differences in opinions regarding the integration’s feasibility, the consensus is that maintaining a clear master-slave relationship, with the ERP system being the master, can help ensure successful ERP pricing implementation.

9. Two-way Integration

The criticality of seamless connectivity between CPQ systems and ERP involves a sophisticated two-way data flow mechanism where pricing details undergo dynamic changes based on evolving product configurations and customer requirements. Failure to consistently audit and manually check the ERP system introduces a cascade of problems, with a specific example illustrating challenges related to published pricing, ERP-configured pricing, and e-commerce pricing. The complexity arises when determining how to price an order, depending on the channel through which the opportunity is initiated. This manual process can lead to discrepancies, especially in repeat orders, creating a compelling argument for centralizing data within the ERP system.

10. Purchase Price

Navigating the landscape of ERP pricing implementation involves not only addressing pricing complexities on the sales side but also delving into the often-overlooked realm of the purchase price. The interconnected nature of the buying and selling sides of the business is often emphasized, stressing the importance of aligning these aspects to ensure overall consistency and efficiency. This advocates for a centralized control system within the ERP, despite potential challenges in getting the entire organization on the same page. It argues that treating the ERP as the source of truth for pricing data, even when residing in different channels, leads to better internal and external service in the long run.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the blog stresses the need for businesses to address the challenges of ERP pricing implementation and advocates for centralized pricing data to mitigate these challenges. It emphasizes the impact of discounting forms, the intricacies of managing distribution channels, and the influence of regulatory requirements on pricing strategies. The central theme revolves around establishing the ERP system as the authoritative source of truth for pricing data. Despite potential resistance, the blog asserts that making the ERP the linchpin for consistent and accurate pricing across diverse channels is vital for internal and external satisfaction. It advocates for a centralized control mechanism within the ERP, underscoring its critical role in successful pricing integration.

Moreover, if you are contemplating ERP pricing implementation, it is essential to consider the factors that may impact your outcomes in the future. Understanding the dynamics of pricing and discounting adds another layer of insight to inform this decision-making process. Armed with this knowledge, you’ll be better equipped to engage in a meaningful and informed discussion with independent ERP consultants who serve as subject matter experts in this field. Collaborating with experienced ERP consultants becomes a strategic step in optimizing your pricing strategies and fostering a streamlined integration that stands the test of time.

FAQs

Top 10 Practices for Pricing and Discounting in ERP

There are a lot of different ways of implementing pricing and discounting in ERP. But there’s always a debate in terms of which is the right system to implement. When we look at pricing, there are always going to be layers and layers of pricing rules. When we look across the industry, some people implement static pricing, which refers to setting prices periodically. It is often based on cost movements. 

Secondly, there’s dynamic pricing, which means that prices can change frequently, sometimes even daily. It is to maximize profit or competitiveness like in e-commerce businesses. Lastly, there’s commodity-based pricing, which industries use where the cost of materials or goods fluctuates. Most of the time, the pricing is based on standard costs, which are generally planned costs that can be updated at periodic intervals. 

This ignites the debate on where pricing should be managed—within the ERP system or externally. Businesses that lack control and consistency in their pricing strategies often face challenges such as maintaining complex distribution channels, tracking discounts and promotions, and handling overtime maintenance. These challenges call for centralized control over pricing offered by an ERP system. 

Top 10 Practices for Pricing and Discounting in ERP

Using an ERP system also eliminates the need for manual pricing decisions. It automates pricing calculations based on predefined rules, reducing errors and saving time. Many industries still resist adopting pricing and discounting processes, despite the advantages that ERP brings to the table. In this blog, we will discuss the top 10 best practices for ERP pricing and discounting processes that will help overcome this resistance. 



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

1. Pricing Simplification

When dealing with resistance from team members or departments, it’s crucial to ask fundamental questions about the complexity of the existing pricing model. The first question is whether the complexity is truly necessary or if it has evolved without clear justification. Complex pricing models can lead to numerous challenges, such as incorrect order bookings, increased potential for human errors, and data entry discrepancies. Misaligned data between the teams responsible for pricing and those responsible for order entry can have significant consequences. It can also impact margins, financial reporting, and overall revenue accuracy.

Simplifying the pricing model leads to a more streamlined and manageable pricing structure, which not only reduces the chances of errors but also enhances overall efficiency. One way to achieve simplification is by categorizing customers, products, or pricing levels and starting with a broader, more straightforward structure. Then, refinements and adjustments can be made as needed.

2. Prevent Human Errors

When different teams are responsible for pricing and discounting data entry, it increases the risk of mistakes and inconsistencies in the pricing process. These errors can have far-reaching consequences, including incorrect pricing, impacting the organization’s profitability and customer satisfaction. Managing pricing and discounting within the ERP system significantly reduces the likelihood of such errors and discrepancies.

Human errors, such as typographical mistakes, miscalculations, or misinterpretations of pricing rules, can result in incorrect pricing on sales orders or invoices. These discrepancies not only impact the immediate transaction but can have a cascading effect, affecting the company’s financial statements and reporting. Maintaining pricing and discounting within the ERP system can mitigate these risks by providing a centralized platform where pricing data can be controlled, validated, and consistently applied. Additionally, automation and validation rules can help catch and prevent errors, ensuring that pricing remains accurate.

3. Tackle Data Entry Challenges

Managing pricing and discounting outside the ERP system presents significant challenges in terms of data entry accuracy and consistency. It’s often difficult to convince organizations to maintain pricing and discounting within the ERP system, and this reluctance can lead to various implications, especially when different teams are involved in the process.  Discrepancies may emerge due to the lack of a centralized control mechanism. Various teams may have their interpretations and ways of entering pricing data, leading to inconsistencies and errors.

These discrepancies can not only affect day-to-day operations but can also have broader implications, impacting an organization’s financial statements, profitability, and customer satisfaction. The risk of data entry errors looms large, as any disconnect between those responsible for setting pricing and those managing data entry leaves room for mistakes, leading to many issues. Ultimately, the integrity and accuracy of data become challenging to maintain. 

4. Maintain Consistency in Financial Data

When pricing and discounting are managed outside the ERP system, several challenges occur. Incorrect pricing, whether due to complexity or siloed departments, can have a far-reaching impact on a business. Even minor pricing errors can accumulate over time, resulting in inaccuracies in financial statements. A pricing structure that is too complex or fragmented can lead to errors in booking orders, creating discrepancies that accumulate over time.

These discrepancies ultimately affect an organization’s profit margins, financial reporting, and the general ledger. Maintaining pricing within the ERP system is the solution to mitigate these challenges. By doing so, organizations can ensure that their financial data remains consistent and accurate. This approach reduces the chances of human errors and ensures that data integrity is maintained throughout the organization.

5. Encourage a Step Back

Reconsider your pricing strategy and its complexity. Also, discuss the benefits of broad pricing rules that can later be refined. Embracing an ERP system for pricing can be challenging, but it’s essential to understand the implications of your pricing strategy and the advantages of a more flexible approach. By asking questions like, “Does it need to be this complex?” and “Why is it so complicated?” organizations can prompt a critical evaluation of their pricing practices. This questioning can lead to a realization that simplification is possible and can result in more straightforward, manageable pricing structures.

6. Automation and Integration

One compelling argument for maintaining pricing and discounting within the ERP is the automation and integration benefits it offers. When pricing rules are established within the ERP system, it can automatically compute prices based on various parameters such as customer, product, quantity, and more. This high level of automation saves both time and effort while also significantly reducing the risk of manual errors. ERP systems are also well-suited for seamless integration with other business processes, guaranteeing the consistent and accurate dissemination of pricing data throughout the organization. This means that prices are calculated consistently, from sales orders to invoices and across various touchpoints within the organization, ensuring that everyone works with the same pricing data. 

7. Integration Requirements

When businesses opt for pricing and discounting outside of their ERP systems, it often necessitates developing complex data flows and integrations to ensure that pricing data is transferred accurately between various systems and departments. This is because pricing is closely tied to other processes, such as order booking and financial reporting, and ensuring consistency and accuracy in data flows becomes crucial. Without proper integration, data discrepancies can arise, leading to errors in pricing and resulting in financial and operational complications.

Furthermore, maintaining data accuracy for pricing is essential, irrespective of whether pricing and discounting is managed within or outside the ERP. Accurate pricing data is the foundation of fair transactions and profit margins. Inaccuracies can lead to errors in customer orders and invoicing, which can erode customer trust and impact financial performance. By emphasizing the need for data accuracy, it becomes evident that pricing data integrity is vital, and this can best be achieved by keeping pricing within the ERP system. 

8. ERP User Interface Simplification

Customizing the user interface of an ERP system can be a powerful solution for making it more accessible to marketers. By customizing the user interface, it is possible to streamline and simplify the user experience. It makes it more user-friendly. This customization can involve creating simplified screens, reducing the number of fields, and focusing on the essential information required for pricing decisions. By doing so, marketers and other users can interact with the ERP system more comfortably. The ERP interface can be tailored to their specific needs and preferences.

9. Encourage Collaboration

To address the reluctance of some departments and promote collaboration, organizations should encourage a cross-functional approach to pricing. This emphasizes shared responsibility for data accuracy. In this context, it’s vital to establish common ground and understanding of the pricing process across departments. Instead of viewing pricing management as the sole responsibility of one department, organizations should highlight that pricing impacts multiple aspects of the business. This may including sales, finance, and marketing. 

By fostering collaboration, various teams can contribute their expertise and insights to create more effective and well-rounded pricing strategies. Additionally, collaboration helps streamline the flow of information and communication. When multiple departments collaborate, it becomes easier to maintain data accuracy and ensure pricing decisions are based on up-to-date and consistent information. 

10. Workflow and Approval Improvements

In the context of streamlining pricing and discounting changes, improving workflow and approval processes within the ERP is critical. Addressing resistance by educating stakeholders on the ERP’s architecture, data flows, and integration challenges, making it clear that maintaining pricing in the ERP is not as daunting as it may seem is important. By improving workflow and approval processes, organizations can create efficient systems for managing pricing changes. This can significantly reduce the complexities associated with pricing management while ensuring data accuracy and streamlined processes within the ERP.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the blog dives into the details of best practices for pricing and discounting in ERP. Mainly highlighting the ongoing debate regarding where these critical processes should be managed – within an ERP system or externally. It emphasizes that pricing complexity often leads to multiple layers of rules. The blog discusses three primary pricing approaches: static pricing, dynamic pricing, and commodity-based pricing. While acknowledging the diversity of preferences, it emphasizes the importance of centralizing control over pricing within an ERP system.

The blog also talks about simplifying pricing models, preventing human errors and discrepancies, and tackling data entry challenges. All of which can adversely impact profit margins and financial reporting when pricing is managed externally. It further encourages a step back to rethink pricing strategies and adopt broader rules that can later be refined. Automation, integration, and improving the ERP user interface are identified as crucial aspects that can help businesses create a compelling case for pricing within the ERP system. The blog also highlights the importance of encouraging department collaboration and making workflow and approval processes more efficient. It also outlines a set of best practices to overcome resistance and successfully manage pricing and discounting processes within an ERP system. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Top 10 ERP Contract Terms

Requiring substantial expertise to understand their implications, ERP contract are cryptic. While legal expertise might help negotiate and comprehend the language, you won’t understand the true implications unless you have expertise with many software packages, enterprise architecture, and licensing arrangements. Also, the ERP contract terms change as vendors update their pricing and configuration, more frequently than you would expect.

Also, the challenge is not just the complexity of  ERP contracts. It’s also the refined negotiation skills of ERP salespeople. With proprietary knowledge to their advantage, they are trained negotiators. Unless you have access to the same proprietary knowledge to be at the same level, you can never beat them. And having this knowledge is only possible when you have someone with a similar skillset on your side. This is why ERP selection consultants and ERP sales reps make a good offense and defense combination.

Top 10 ERP Contract Terms

Finally, most buyers are so biased in seeking discounts and the cheapest quote, with a limited attention span to identify and understand the risks buried with ERP contracts. The risks could be as severe as data loss or not understanding the ownership of components packaged with the software. The ERP contract terms outlined below will help you identify the risks buried with the ERP contracts and avoid any surprises after signing one.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

1. Editions and Modules

Understanding editions and modules and how they map to each SKU in ERP contracts is essential to avoid financial surprises post signing. Not familiar with editions and modules and how they work? Software vendors commonly price their products based on editions and modules. The main challenge with editions and modules is their overlap and configuration bundles, which means different bundling arrangements might have the exact same outcome but very different price points and risk profiles. So you need to make sure that you have the complete grasp of the fine lines around editions and modules.

To get the maximum discount, experiment with different configurations of editions and modules. But, don’t forget to understand their limitations. This requires a deep probing of how these editions and modules are structured and function, which may go beyond what the sales representatives can provide.

2. License Terms

Even the most friendly ERP OEMs who claim to be consumption-based would require you to commit to the ERP contract terms, with very little flexibility in making any changes. The variables that have an impact because of the license term would be the number of users, types of licenses, and tiers of licenses. As well as the scope and duration of the agreement. 

Once the contract is signed, scaling up the number of seats or expanding the scope of your ERP system is generally straightforward as this leads to additional revenue for them.  But scaling down is a revenue loss for them, so they are likely to make it as difficult as possible. In most cases, prorated adjustments to your ERP contract terms might not be possible, unless the agreement explicitly articulates this provision.

3. User Access and User Types

Each ERP system and vendor is likely to have very different user access tiers and types. Even among different versions of the same product, the user access and types might vary. The user access and types could have several variables such as limited access vs full access users. Concurrent vs named users. Devices licenses vs application users. They each have implications on what users will do with the application and might drive the total contract value substantially. 

Unless you have gone through rounds of due diligence, which is rare for most companies due to the amount of effort and investment required in the selection phase. Also, the perceived limited value of the due diligence might trigger companies to short-circuit the due diligence process, and because of this architecture might not be fully developed, limiting the visibility into access types required. You might also not have complete visibility into users’ workflow and how they will be using the software. 

These issues collectively might drive changes to user access and types, leading to substantial financial surprises after signing the contract, which even the initially offered discounts might not be able to make up for. Therefore, it’s essential to perform the due diligence to an extent where you have relative confidence in the total contract value. And you are not being myopic with discounts. The ERP selection consultants can help you plan the user access and types better with limited financial surprises.

4. Reseller Tiers

Generally dictated by ERP publishers, each reseller is generally at a specific tier, which drives their discount and pricing, as well as the price and discounts they can offer you. The OEM typically determines these tiers based on various factors, such as the reseller’s sales performance, expertise, and commitment to selling the OEM’s products, including ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software and services.

OEMs often provide more generous discounts to new resellers to their partnership program. This is a strategic move to encourage newer partners to sell the ERP software and services actively, essentially helping the OEM build their customer base and expand their market presence. But wait, this might only be applicable for the first few deals, after that they are likely to lose this privilege as they will need to match the performance with their larger peers to be able to receive the same discounts.

Understanding their tier would be especially critical while switching resellers. The discount ERP contract terms and the overall agreement may not be the same with a new reseller as with the previous one. Therefore, it’s essential to carefully analyze the implications and terms of such a change to ensure it aligns with the company’s objectives and budget.

5. Discounts

Each vendors have their own discounting strategy, some keep their list pricing higher and discount heavily. The others, on the other hand, are likely to offer much lower discounts. The discounts could be up to 50-60% off the original list price, but they might also vary per line item. This is especially true with implementation and support line items. They might not offer as deep discounts. Some discounts might be available only in certain regions or with certain types of resellers, depending upon the strategic priority of the OEM. 

Some discounts could also be timely. The discounts are likely to be higher in Q4 as ERP vendors might be trying to meet their numbers for the year and might offer much heavier discount. While planning your ERP implementation around discounts is a great idea, don’t make your decisions purely based on discounts. This is especially true while signing the ERP contracts. Don’t rush to sign an ERP contract just because the discounts might expire. Generally, ERP vendors match up the offer if the decision is likely to be purely based on price especially if they might not have a true differentiator.

The discounting might vary per rep as well, just because ERP vendors carry hundreds of SKUs and several different pricing and discounting strategies. Depending upon the skillset of the rep, you might not the best discount just because they might not understand all permutations and combinations. This is where ERP selection consultants can help. They have access to thousands of their previous quotes and can compare the discount at the line level, ensuring maximum discounts, without assuming unnecessary risk that might lead to financial surprises.

6. Price Lock

The decision about how long to sign the ERP contract might be tricky. If you sign up for a longer term and if the software doesn’t work to your expectations, you might be locked in the contract even if you are not able to use the software. But the shorter the term, the lower the discount. In the case of implementation issues, most ERP vendors might offer suggestions such as changing resellers or another round of implementation methodology but if there are serious implementation challenges due to the design of the software, you may end up losing even more. This would be true even after paying for the full term of the contract, without getting any value from the software. 

So depending upon the risk profile of the project, you need to assess the right length of the contract. Don’t sign for longer term contracts purely because of discounts. Make an informed decision based on the risk profile of your implementation.

7. More Users/Feature Discount Guarantee

This clause addresses the situation where an organization plans to expand its usage of the ERP system by adding more users or activating additional features beyond what was initially agreed upon in the ERP contract. In such cases, the software vendor might have mechanisms to negotiate the pricing for these additional users or features.

Instead of guaranteeing the cheapest initial quote, some ERP vendors provide a different kind of assurance – a discount guarantee for future purchases or modifications. This means that if you decide to scale up your ERP usage by adding more users or enabling new features, the vendor commits to providing you with the same discounted rate, ensuring that you don’t pay the expensive list price.

By including this clause, you ensure that the favorable pricing and discounts you negotiated during the initial contract negotiation phase will still be applicable even when you make changes to the ERP system. This can help avoid unexpected expenses, accommodating your to-be state as you learn more about your needs in the implementation phase.

8. License Price Increase

Most ERP vendors understand that customers are not likely to switch from their ERP system once they are settled on it. Also, winning an ERP deal is extremely challenging because of the same issue. For these reasons, ERP vendors offer substantial discounts in the initial years. But the increase is likely to be steep with renewal. 

Sometimes the increase might be so steep that smaller companies might struggle to afford it. That’s why negotiating a license price increase is essential. Some vendors are fair and they might not increase more than 5% and will be willing to include that provision. The other vendors might be tricky to work with and might discount the pricing so much in the initial years that a 5% increase or including such provision might not be feasible. Have a clause for the license increase baked in as part of the contract, even if you sign a shorter term contract.

Also, coverage of all items as part of the license price increase clause is critical. In some cases, if several third-party add-ons are included as part of the solution, the ERP vendor might not be able to guarantee the license price increase on those line items. In fact, changes in add-ons might also drive architectural changes and as a result, licensing, which might not be covered by the license price increase clause. Perform a risk analysis of each line item and assess if there might be any charges that might not be covered by the license price increase clause.

9. License Fee Waived Off First Year

When a vendor offers to “waive off” the license fee for the first year, it means they are willing to provide the ERP software to the customer for the initial year without charging the regular annual licensing fee. This offer is often made to ensure that customers only pay when they use the software in production. During the test phase, the cost for the ERP vendor is relatively low as the test infrastructure or the cloud instance is likely to be on inferior infrastructure and some vendors are willing to do that to ensure that the customers are not paying twice as they are likely to still pay for their old software while they implement and test the new one.

However, it’s crucial to understand that while waiving the license fee for the first year can be financially beneficial in the short term, it may impact the overall cost of the ERP solution over the long term. To evaluate the true cost-effectiveness of this arrangement, it is advisable to create a comprehensive cost schedule that takes into account all costs associated with the ERP implementation over a more extended period, such as 5 to 10 years. 

10. Financing Options

Many ERP vendors may collaborate with third-party financial institutions to offer this option to their clients. However, it’s crucial to understand that ERP vendors often use this financing option as a negotiation tool to gain leverage on other ERP contract terms. They might expect concessions in other areas, such as customization, support, or pricing, in exchange for offering financing. Therefore, businesses should carefully assess whether this financing option aligns with their needs and objectives.

Suppose the financing option is not directly relevant to your situation, or you have access to other external funding sources. In that case, it may be wiser to concentrate on the contractual clauses likely to impact your overall cost structure significantly. Ultimately, the decision to utilize the financing option should be based on a thorough evaluation of your financial circumstances and the specific conditions outlined in the ERP contract. By doing so, you can ensure that you make informed choices that are in the best interest of your organization’s ERP implementation project.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

11. User Limit by Version

Your current edition and version may restrict the number of users that you can have on that version. If you outgrow that, then you need to switch to the next version, which might be more expensive than the smaller version. It’s crucial to understand your current version and edition to determine how this will impact your future pricing. Additionally, ensure that the price lock remains applicable if you switch versions or editions.

12. Transaction Restrictions

Similar to user limits, your current edition may also have transaction restrictions. Upon reaching these limits, you may be required to upgrade to a higher, more costly tier. It’s worth noting that the nature of transactions can vary substantially across industries. For industries with low-value transactions, such as retail, these restrictions can be particularly important during contract negotiations. Be sure to assess the implications of transaction limits.

13. Infrastructure Price Changes

Similar to third-party add-ons, ERP vendors may have limited control over the underlying infrastructure. Furthermore, claims of unlimited users may come with unexpressed restrictions. It’s essential to comprehend any imposed limitations to enable an unlimited model fully. These limits could pertain to storage, bandwidth, speed, infrastructure, and additional charges for add-ons. In some cases, these charges might surpass the licensing costs.

14. Application User Pricing

Pricing for application users or connectors may deviate from the pricing structure for named users. Familiarize yourself with the pricing variables, such as the number of transactions, API calls, queue messages, and other factors. Typically, these users need higher technical expertise to estimate transaction volumes accurately.

15. Third-Party Products and Warranties

ERP contracts are similar to complex bills of materials involving various dependencies, white-labeled add-ons, and products owned by third parties. Scrutinize the contracts and request the vendor to clearly specify the software products where warranty coverage may depend on their relationships with the vendors. Identify all the connections between the software providers and their vendors and how these relationships are established. Assess the potential consequences of losing these relationships and understand the warranties, especially in the context of pass-through warranties.

16. Ownership of Custom Code and Intellectual Property

Resellers or Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) may customize the software for you but might not grant access to the code, limiting your ability to seek support in the future. If a reseller or ISV plans to utilize any intellectual property (IP), ensure the contract includes provisions specifying ownership.

17. Data Ownership

Each ERP vendor may have distinct policies regarding data ownership. Thoroughly review the contract provisions to understand the format in which data will be provided and the duration for data access or deletion in the event of contract termination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ERP contracts require expertise to uncover financial risks that might not be as obvious to a layperson. By understanding these ERP contract terms, you will be empowered to negotiate and minimize financial risks. Remember, ERP selection is only the beginning; managing change and ensuring the terms of your contract align with your business goals are ongoing processes. Having a knowledgeable ally by your side, one who keeps abreast of industry developments can be invaluable. So, as you embark on your ERP journey, don’t take ERP contracts lightly as they might fire back in ways you wouldn’t expect. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Top 6 Cloud ERP vs On-Premise ERP Differences

In today’s evolving business landscape, ERP systems play an important role in streamlining operations, enhancing efficiency, and providing real-time insights to support decision-making. When it comes to ERP implementation, businesses often face a crucial decision: choosing between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP. Each option has its unique advantages and drawbacks, and the choice largely depends on your organization’s specific needs and objectives. Therefore, here are six criteria that might help you choose between the two:



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Top 6 Cloud ERP vs On-Premise ERP Differences

1. Contractual Model

One of the fundamental differences when choosing between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP lies in their contractual models. Cloud ERP typically operates under a subscription services agreement, often referred to as software as a service (SaaS). This means that when you opt for a cloud ERP solution, you essentially enter into a recurring fee arrangement. Much like a monthly or annual subscription, you pay for access to the software for a predetermined period. This subscription-based model offers businesses a pay-as-you-go approach, allowing them to access the ERP system without needing a substantial upfront investment.

On the other hand, the contractual model for on-premise ERP follows a different path. It involves a one-time license fee for purchasing the software. In addition to the upfront licensing cost, businesses need to budget for periodic maintenance and support fees to ensure the software remains updated and well-supported. Unlike the cloud ERP’s subscription-based approach, on-premise ERP necessitates a significant initial investment in the license fee. This cost model often results in higher upfront expenses, making it crucial for organizations to weigh the benefits of perpetual ownership against the immediate financial implications. Therefore, the choice between these two contractual models represents a fundamental decision point in ERP selection, heavily influenced by the organization’s financial capacity, long-term strategy, and budgeting preferences.

2. Fee Structure

When it comes to cloud ERP, businesses must pay a periodic subscription fee. This fee grants them access to the ERP software for a specific duration, much like a monthly or annual subscription to an online service. This subscription model provides a high degree of flexibility and scalability, making it a compelling option for organizations seeking to effectively manage their expenditures while maintaining the capacity to adapt to evolving business requirements. Cloud ERP’s subscription-based fee structure offers the advantage of pay-as-you-go, allowing businesses to pay for what they use and adjust their subscription as their needs change. This financial agility is particularly appealing to smaller enterprises and those operating in dynamic environments where the ability to scale resources up or down is a critical requirement.

In contrast, the fee structure for on-premise ERP significantly diverges from cloud-based counterparts. When opting for an on-premise ERP system, an organization must make a one-time payment as a license fee to acquire the software. This initial license fee can be a substantial upfront investment. However, this is not the end of the financial commitment. Ongoing maintenance and support fees are obligatory to ensure the software remains up-to-date, well-supported, and compliant with changing regulations and business requirements. These fees are recurrent and necessary to keep the software functioning optimally. While the up-front license fee grants perpetual ownership of the software, these additional recurring costs are crucial for maintaining the efficiency, security, and functionality of the on-premise ERP system

This fee structure reflects a different approach to financial investment, emphasizing a one-time capital outlay followed by recurring operational expenses. This approach might be more suitable for larger enterprises with the capacity to invest significantly upfront and maintain dedicated IT staff to manage the system.

3. Rights

Cloud ERP operates under a subscription model, meaning that your organization essentially rents the software for the subscription period. This arrangement offers flexibility, allowing businesses to scale their usage up or down as needed, and it provides a sense of agility. However, it’s crucial to understand that your right to access and use the software is contingent on the continuation of your subscription. Once the subscription period ends, so does your access. This can be a double-edged sword, as it provides adaptability but also means ongoing costs.

On the other hand, on-premise ERP takes a different approach by offering a perpetual license. This means that, upon purchase, your organization secures the right to use the software indefinitely. This can particularly appeal to businesses looking for a long-term, one-time investment. It essentially grants you ownership of the software, providing a sense of control and independence. However, it’s important to note that this perpetual license doesn’t necessarily cover ongoing support and maintenance, which typically come with additional costs. The choice between these models hinges on your organization’s specific needs and long-term objectives. Cloud ERP’s subscription model suits those seeking flexibility and scalability, while on-premise ERP’s perpetual license is favored by those aiming for a lasting investment with full control over the software.

4. Hosting Model

The hosting model in the cloud ERP versus on-premise ERP comparison defines the ownership and management of the enterprise architecture where your ERP system resides. In the case of cloud ERP, the hosting responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of the ERP vendor. This means the vendor sets up, maintains, and manages the servers and the underlying infrastructure required for the ERP system to function. They are also responsible for ensuring the system runs smoothly and any technical issues or updates are addressed promptly. This hands-off approach can appeal to businesses as it relieves them of the burden of managing IT infrastructure, which can be resource-intensive.

In contrast, on-premise ERP shifts the hosting responsibility to the customer. When an organization opts for an on-premise solution, they need to invest in and maintain their own servers and IT infrastructure to house the ERP system. This entails purchasing the necessary hardware, setting up data centers or server rooms, and having IT personnel oversee the ongoing enterprise architecture maintenance and support. While this approach provides greater control and privacy over data, it also requires a significant upfront investment and ongoing operational costs. It’s important to carefully assess your organization’s IT capabilities and resources when considering the hosting model, as it can substantially impact the long-term management of your ERP system.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

5. Application Backup And Redundancy

Data backup and redundancy are fundamental to any robust ERP system, ensuring business continuity and data integrity. When it comes to cloud ERP, these aspects are typically handled by the vendor, relieving the user’s burden. The vendor implements automated data backup processes, regularly copying and storing your data in secure, off-site locations. This meticulous approach minimizes the risk of data loss in case of unexpected events, such as hardware failures, natural disasters, or cyberattacks. In essence, your data is well-protected and can be swiftly restored, reducing downtime and potential financial losses.

Conversely, with on-premise ERP, your organization is responsible for application backup and redundancy. This entails investing in backup solutions, establishing comprehensive project recovery plans, and maintaining the necessary infrastructure to safeguard your data. While this approach grants you greater control over your data’s security and recovery processes, it requires substantial resources, including IT expertise and budget allocation. Failing to adequately address these aspects can result in prolonged system downtime and potential data loss, making it critical for on-premise ERP users to proactively manage their data backup and redundancy solutions to maintain business continuity.

6. Software Source Code Modifications

Customization significantly tailors an ERP system to align with a business’s specific needs and processes. The customization differs significantly in the context of cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP. Cloud ERP solutions typically limit the extent of customization permitted by the vendor. While you may have some flexibility to configure settings, make minor adjustments, and personalize certain aspects of the system, extensive modifications to the software’s source code are generally restricted in cloud-based systems. This limitation is mainly in place to maintain system stability and ensure that customizations don’t interfere with the software’s core functionality. Cloud ERP providers aim to provide standardized, easily maintainable solutions that cater to a broad range of businesses, so they often limit deep-level source code alterations.

Conversely, on-premise ERP software offers a more significant degree of flexibility when it comes to software source code modifications. Businesses can often negotiate with the ERP vendor to make changes customizations, or fine-tune the source code to align more closely with their highly specialized or unique requirements. This extensive customization ability is a major advantage for businesses with intricate processes or specific industry demands. With on-premise ERP, you have greater control over the software’s underlying code, allowing you to create a more tailored solution. However, it’s essential to recognize that this level of customization may require a skilled IT team and lead to higher ERP implementation and maintenance costs, as well as the need for more significant oversight to ensure that the system remains stable and secure.

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between cloud ERP vs on-premise ERP depends on your organization’s specific needs, budget, and IT infrastructure capabilities. Cloud ERP offers flexibility, scalability, and hands-off management, making it suitable for businesses looking to streamline operations quickly. On the other hand, on-premise ERP provides a long-term investment with greater control over customization and data management. 

Carefully assessing your business requirements and considering the factors mentioned above will help you make an informed decision and choose the ERP solution that aligns with your objectives and growth plans. Ultimately, both options have their strengths, and the right choice is the one that best serves your unique business needs. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with independent ERP consultants.

FAQs

Top 10 TMS Systems In 2024

What exactly is a TMS system? The interpretation can vary depending on who you ask. In the transportation and 3PL sectors, a TMS essentially functions as their ERP, overseeing up to 90% of their processes. Historically, TMS packages excluded accounting, relying on external accounting software like Sage or Microsoft GP. With the advent of cloud-based TMS systems, a comprehensive solution, including accounting, is now possible. This complexity adds an extra layer of challenge to the process of selecting a TMS system.

Similar to WMS, TMS systems come in various forms. At times, they function as tools for supply chain consulting firms to oversee their transportation clients. Given that certain TMS vendors may not exclusively be technology-focused, political considerations influence carrier participation in their network. These factors play a role in determining the quality of the rating algorithm and the insights derived from AI and ML.

Additionally, the scale of TMS systems can differ depending on their size. For example, smaller TMS systems may serve as basic shipping add-ons, offering streamlined features like rate shopping. In contrast, larger TMS systems not only encompass all transportation modes but may also include a carrier network and other integrated supply chain capabilities. So for those seeking a TMS solution, grasping the impact of these layers on TMS scope is crucial. Now, let’s explore the top 10 TMS systems in 2024.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Criteria

  • Overall market share/# of customers: How large is the market share of this TMS product? TMS vendors‘ overall market share is irrelevant for this list if they have multiple TMS products in their portfolio. 
  • Ownership/funding: Who owns the TMS vendor? Is it a private equity company, a family or a group of families, or a wealthy corporate investor?
  • Quality of development (legacy vs. legacy dressed as modern vs. modern UX/cloud-native): How modern is the tech stack? Not clunky! How aggressively is the TMS vendor pushing cloud-native functionality for this product? No fake clouds! Is the roadmap officially announced? Or uncertain?
  • Community/Ecosystem: How vibrant is the community? Social media groups? In-person user groups? Forums?
  • Depth of native functionality (for specific industries): Last-mile functionality for specific industries natively built into the product?
  • Quality of publicly available product documentation: How well-documented is the product? Is the documentation available publicly? How updated is the demo content available on YouTube?
  • Product share and documented commitment (of the publisher through financial statements): Is the product share reported separately in financial statements if the TMS  vendor is public?
  • Acquisition strategy aligned with the product: Are there any recent acquisitions to fill a specific hole with this product? Are there any official announcements to integrate recently acquired capabilities?
  • Maturity of the Supply Chain Suite: How mature are other capabilities that would augment TMS, such as WMS, S&OP, and the network?
  • User Reviews: How specific are the reviews about this product’s capabilities? How recent and frequent are the reviews?
  • Must be a TMS product: Must be a recognized TMS product by several analyst firms with a proven track record and market share.

10. CH Robinson/Navisphere TMS

Navisphere, a TMS solution provided by supply chain consulting firm CH Robinson, is tailored for companies seeking both supply chain subject matter expertise and a technical solution. However, it may not be the ideal choice for those solely seeking a TMS solution without managed services. So opt for CH Robinson if you require a TMS solution supporting multiple transportation modes, including managed services from a single vendor.

Pros
  1. Network strength of CH Robinson. A notable advantage is the robustness of CH Robinson’s proprietary network, influencing rates and providing quality insights.
  2. Supply chain industry expertise. CH Robinson brings extensive subject matter knowledge and holds licenses for various transportation modes, eliminating the need for third-party consulting firms.
  3. Comprehensive supply chain services. CH Robinson serves as a one-stop shop for various supply chain needs, particularly excelling in the food and produce market.
Cons
  1. Potential conflict of interest. Some may perceive CH Robinson’s pricing algorithm as biased, leading to concerns about carriers avoiding collaboration due to potential conflicts of interest.
  2. Not a pure TMS solution. While smaller companies exclusively working with CH Robinson might find it suitable as a TMS solution, it may not be the best fit for those collaborating with multiple vendors.
  3. Limited to the CH Robinson network. A significant limitation is that the solution is confined to the CH Robinson network

9. Trimble TMS

Trimble, a robust TMS solution tailored for transportation companies, stands out with its features for driver compliance, reporting, and monitoring. While an excellent fit for the trucking or 3PL industry managing internal fleets, Trimble TMS may not be suitable for businesses with non-transportation-centric models, such as retail or manufacturing. 

Opting for Trimble is advisable if you operate in the trucking or 3PL sector, particularly with an internal fleet. However, for cloud-native solutions, especially in industries with different business models, exploring other options may be more appropriate. Choose Trimble if you are in the trucking or 3PL industry with an internal fleet, but look elsewhere for cloud-native solutions, especially in industries without transportation-like business models.

Pros
  1. Maps and telematics. Trimble facilitates accurate data collection from drivers, minimizing errors and operational overhead.
  2. Tailored for trucking companies. Designed with unique TMS capabilities essential for trucking operations, including dispatch, scheduling, and batch load planning.
  3. Pre-built compliance for trucking. Compliance requirements are seamlessly integrated into operational workflows, reducing administrative efforts for trucking companies.
Cons
  1. Legacy technology. While functionally strong, Trimble’s solution relies on legacy technology.
  2. Limited industry focus. Due to its industry-specific focus, Trimble may not be the optimal choice for diverse companies.
  3. Not fully independent. Similar to CH Robinson, Trimble provides managed services, making it less independent than some solutions on this list.

8. Descartes TMS

Descartes proves to be an excellent choice for companies seeking multi-modal capabilities within their international supply chain networks. It also has another TMS platform in its portfolio tailored for trucking companies and 3PL providers, providing options for multiple market segments. 

Opt for Descartes if you require a best-of-breed TMS solution with multi-modal capabilities and operate within a large enterprise setting. Descartes might also have options for smaller trucking companies as well as 3PL with smaller operations.

Pros
  1. Managed services available. Descartes TMS provides managed services, offering support for international regulatory and compliance requirements.
  2. Comprehensive TMS with international data analytics. The solution is a comprehensive TMS featuring extensive capabilities, including a visibility platform for the international supply chain.
  3. Options for multiple Market Segments. Descartes has specific solutions for different market segments, covering their unique needs without pushing them for solutions that are one-size-fits-all.
Cons
  1. Not completely independent. Similar to CH Robinson, Descartes relies on managed services, which may limit its independence.
  2. May not be SMB-friendly. SMB companies seeking a cost-effective solution might find Descartes to be relatively expensive.
  3. Not a complete suite with WMS, etc. As a best-of-breed TMS solution, Descartes requires integration with external systems, such as WMS and S&OP, to achieve parity with other solutions on this list.

7. Mercury Gate

Mercury Gate, a cloud-native TMS solution, caters to SMB companies transitioning from smaller shipping add-ons like Pacejet or ShipStation. However, it may not be the optimal choice for large enterprises or businesses with international supply chains.

Consider Mercury Gate if you are an SMB DTC or CPG company seeking a cloud-native solution. On the contrary, if you are an enterprise or have an international supply chain, Mercury Gate may not align with your requirements.

Pros
  1. Fleet management and last-mile capabilities. Particularly beneficial for companies in the CPG and DTC space.
  2. Claims management capabilities. Aiding in freight audits for companies with 3PL components in their business model.
  3. Cloud-native UI. Attractive for companies using cloud-native ERP solutions like NetSuite or Acumatica.
Cons
  1. Limited to North America. Mercury Gate currently focuses solely on North America, which may be restrictive for companies with international supply chains.
  2. Not integrated with other platforms such as WMS. As a standalone TMS solution, it lacks integration with a complete suite, including pre-integrated WMS or S&OP, posing a limitation for budget-conscious companies.
  3. Limiting reporting capabilities. Users have reported that the reporting capabilities are not as pre-configured compared to some other platforms.

6. 3Gtms TMS (Pacejet)

3Gtms, tailored for SMB trucking companies and bolstered by the Pacejet acquisition, expands its capabilities to cover not just LTL and FTL but also parcel shipments. However, it’s not the ideal choice for large enterprises.

Consider 3Gtms if you seek a TMS solution encompassing all transportation modes—LTL, FTL, and parcels—for domestic shippers with some international presence. Nevertheless, if you are in pursuit of a cloud-native experience with a sophisticated supply chain suite, 3Gtms might not align with your requirements.

Pros
  1. SMB-friendly. The solution offers advanced dispatch and load management capabilities, catering to the needs of SMBs.
  2. Complete shipping solution. Encompassing all transportation modes for domestic shippers, 3Gtms provides a comprehensive shipping solution, albeit with a focus on SMBs.
  3. Ideal for light TMS needs. Particularly useful for companies with light shipping requirements, especially those seeking a native or hybrid experience within SMB ERP ecosystems like Acumatica or Infor CloudSuite Industrial (Syteline).
Cons
  1. Not enterprise and integrated suite. Lacking components found in larger supply chain suites, 3Gtms is not the best fit for large enterprises.
  2. May require add-ons for advanced capabilities. Advanced features may necessitate third-party add-ons or customization, potentially limiting applicability to all business models.
  3. Patchy User Experience. While the PaceJet solution is cloud-native, the older components remain legacy, potentially affecting the overall user experience.

5. e2open (BlueJays/Cloud Logistics)

e2open stands out as the most comprehensive suite, offering balanced capabilities in execution, planning, and network. It caters to enterprises seeking a pre-integrated suite with robust planning and forecasting, leveraging AI and ML. However, it may not be the ideal choice for smaller companies.

Consider e2open if you are a large enterprise utilizing SAP or Oracle, seeking an enterprise-grade supply chain suite to manage international supply chains, especially if collaborative planning and forecasting with suppliers are essential.

Pros
  1. All Modes. The execution component covers road, rail, ocean, and air, boasting strong enterprise-grade capabilities.
  2. Global Reach. e2open spans a broad geographic reach, encompassing most regions worldwide, providing an advantage over smaller solutions.
  3. Ideal for Collaboration-Centric Businesses. With robust capabilities for channel-centric businesses and integrated TMS capabilities, e2open suits companies seeking a comprehensive, pre-integrated suite.
Cons
  1. Not as Complete as Some Competitors. While highly comprehensive, e2open may not boast the strongest TMS solution compared to others on this list, especially in areas like in-house fleet and driver compliance.
  2. Not SMB-Friendly. The solution’s complexity and cost may be overwhelming for SMBs.
  3. Limited Ecosystem. Being relatively new in the market, e2open has a somewhat limited ecosystem compared to more established solutions.

4. Manhattan Associates

Manhattan is renowned for its WMS but also integrates TMS capabilities into its Supply Chain suite, which is particularly beneficial for industries with substantial retail store traffic like apparel, footwear, or grocery. Ideal for those already using Manhattan WMS, it provides integrated TMS functionality, though not recommended for SMBs.

Choose Manhattan TMS if you are currently utilizing or considering Manhattan as part of your architectural framework.

Pros
  1. Pre-Integrated with WMS. Simplifies operations for companies with limited IT capabilities or a constrained budget, although pre-integrated workflows should be thoroughly assessed based on specific use cases.
  2. Suited for Retail-Centric Industries. Manhattan’s focus on retail ensures robust TMS workflows for high-volume grocery, apparel, and shoe verticals.
Cons
  1. TMS as an Add-On. TMS is not Manhattan’s primary offering, potentially lacking the mature capabilities found in best-of-breed TMS systems.
  2. Not for SMBs. Tailored for upper-mid market and enterprise segments, it may overwhelm SMBs with its extensive features.
  3. Expensive. Geared towards enterprises, Manhattan’s premium offering might be costly for SMBs not requiring advanced enterprise features.

3. SAP Transportation Management

SAP transportation management solutions cater primarily to companies already entrenched in SAP technologies, especially SAP EWM, seeking to build their entire tech stack on SAP. These solutions are well-suited for large enterprises with product-centric operations and distributors, especially with complex business models such as 3PL.

Smaller companies may find SAP’s offerings overwhelming. Opt for an SAP transportation management solution if you need an execution component pre-integrated with SAP technologies, compatible with other enterprise-grade solutions like e2open or Project44.

Pros
  1. Pre-Integrated with SAP Suite. SAP TM seamlessly integrates with other SAP offerings within the SAP S/4 HANA suite, particularly EWM, though careful vetting is essential to ensure compatibility with unique use cases.
  2. Ideal for Large Enterprises (> $10B). Companies exceeding $10 billion in size, requiring global compliance and transactional traceability, stand to gain the most value from SAP transportation management.
  3. Ideal for Complex Business Models. Companies with intricate business models, such as distributors with 3PL operations or 3PL firms needing comprehensive billing functionality, will find SAP’s solution compelling.
Cons
  1. Relies on Descartes for Carrier Communication. External communication and document management may not be as advanced as other solutions, necessitating additional expenses, such as Descartes, for carrier communication.
  2. Requires Add-Ons for Comparison with Manhattan and Blue Yonder. Achieving parity with other components of a supply chain suite may demand several costly add-ons not readily available with SAP.
  3. Not Suitable for SMBs. SMBs may find SAP’s capabilities not only overwhelming but also cost-prohibitive due to their alignment with more mature functionalities.

2. Blue Yonder

Blue Yonder boasts one of the most robust supply chain suites, encompassing various facets, including planning and execution, with a particularly robust execution component for transportation management. 

Notably, Blue Yonder distinguishes itself from e2open by leveraging network and data from partners, while e2open operates on its proprietary network. Blue Yonder stands out with a significant number of enterprise-grade installations compared to other vendors. Opt for Blue Yonder if you need a fully integrated supply chain suite, specially tailored for retail-centric industries, covering diverse areas, from execution to planning.

Pros
  1. Comprehensive Supply Chain Suite. Blue Yonder offers one of the most comprehensive supply chain suites, aligning particularly well with retailers due to its data model.
  2. Ideal for Enterprises. Enterprises aiming for supply chain process maturity will find Blue Yonder’s capabilities valuable, designed to seamlessly integrate global supply chain processes.
  3. Global Supply Chain Capabilities with Control Tower. Blue Yonder’s supply chain spans all modes and geographies, providing end-to-end traceability for global supply chain operations.
Cons
  1. Not for SMBs. SMBs seeking simpler solutions may find Blue Yonder overwhelming.
  2. Not Ideal for Standalone TMS Needs. The integrated suite might be excessive for companies seeking straightforward capabilities to manage transportation and logistics processes independently.
  3. Expensive. Companies seeking simpler solutions might perceive Blue Yonder’s mature capabilities as costly.

1. Oracle TMS

Much like SAP, Oracle excels in providing enterprise-grade execution components for transportation management, particularly in industries where tight collaboration with other Oracle solutions like ERP or RMS is essential. 

This is especially beneficial for sectors with stringent compliance and regulatory requirements, such as international trade compliance and reporting. So opt for Oracle TMS if you require enterprise-grade transportation solutions with a dynamic ecosystem integrating best-of-breed capabilities for other components of the supply chain suite.

Pros
  1. Pre-Integrated with Oracle ERP. Oracle TMS offers a seamlessly embedded experience with WMS, RMS, and ERP, a feature not available in standalone systems.
  2. Ideal for Retail and Transportation-Centric Industries. With a strong presence in retail and transportation verticals, Oracle’s R&D focus caters to the unique needs of these sectors.
  3. Global Supply Chain Capabilities with Control Tower. Oracle TMS spans all transportation modes globally, ensuring end-to-end traceability of the execution component and featuring control tower capabilities.
Cons
  1. Not for SMBs. SMBs seeking simpler solutions may find Oracle’s enterprise capabilities overwhelming and unnecessary.
  2. Not Ideal for Standalone TMS Needs. Companies desiring straightforward standalone TMS solutions without impacting other departments or processes might find Oracle to be too comprehensive.
  3. Expensive. Enterprises seeking simpler solutions may perceive Oracle’s enterprise-grade features as overwhelming and unnecessarily costly.
+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

Conclusion

Much like other enterprise software categories, TMS systems come in various configurations. The suitability of a TMS system for a business largely depends on how it aligns with the enterprise architecture and business model.

If you’re considering a TMS system, it’s crucial to distinguish between systems provided by consulting firms and those by pure-play technology firms. Delve into your business model and enterprise architecture to evaluate which system aligns best with your needs. This list aims to offer potential options for your further evaluation with Independent TMS consultants.

FAQs

Team collaboration in an ERP environment - Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams.

Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams

If you can build the consensus as part of your ERP projects, your ERP implementation will likely be successful. Building consensus is always the first challenge. Since ERP implementations involve various teams and stakeholders, the challenges associated with it are multifaceted if everybody is not on the same page. What consensus does not usually represent is when decision-making in the organization is very centralized and is not spread across the departments.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

If a broad consensus does not exist among the leadership team, the management team, and even the process owners, it can make the ERP project fall apart if the controller walks out of it in the middle of the project. It can be a nightmare. Therefore, in this blog, we will explore the top 10 strategies to build consensus among ERP teams. 

Top 10 Strategies To Build Consensus Among ERP Teams

1. Establishing Clear Goals and Objectives

The ERP implementation process should always begin with setting crystal-clear objectives and goals. Keeping the goals straightforward and comprehensive cannot be stressed enough. For example, if your existing ERP system is outdated and you wish to upgrade to the latest technology, this simple and high-level goal can be the guiding light for the entire team. These goals act as a foundation upon which the strategies and actions are built, ensuring that everyone is moving in the same direction.

A balanced approach, in this case, always works to establish clear goals and objectives. Simply asking team members, “What do you want to do?” might lead to uncertainty and vague responses. Therefore,  providing a framework or structure for these goals, and then seeking input and feedback from team members, can be highly effective. By offering guidelines and allowing team members to have their say within a defined framework, you strike a balance between giving them a sense of involvement and providing a structured direction.

2. Leadership Commitment and Engagement

Effective ERP implementation requires leadership that leads by example. When leaders are actively engaged and committed to the project, their enthusiasm becomes contagious. Their involvement sets the tone for the entire team, demonstrating the importance of the ERP project. In essence, they act as cheerleaders, rallying the troops and showing that they believe in the project’s potential. Leadership commitment is essential not only to encourage the team but also to convey the message that this ERP implementation is a top priority for the organization. When team members see that leaders are dedicated, they are more likely to follow suit, building consensus around the project’s significance.

3. Effective Communication and Transparency

Open and transparent communication is the lifeblood of any successful ERP project. Clear communication channels ensure team members are on the same page and aware of project developments. Transparency fosters trust, as team members feel informed and included in the decision-making process. It also helps in addressing concerns early, preventing any misalignments or misunderstandings from derailing the project.

Effective communication generally includes regular team meetings, progress updates, and a willingness to listen to team members’ feedback and concerns. Moreover, providing straightforward answers to questions and being candid about potential challenges and roadblocks will further enhance the team’s understanding and willingness to support the project.

4. Inclusive Team Collaboration

ERP implementations often involve various teams and departments within an organization. To build consensus, it’s essential to foster inclusive team collaboration. This means breaking down silos and encouraging different functional teams to work together. By involving all relevant departments, you can ensure that no critical perspectives or needs are overlooked. Cross-functional collaboration also instills a sense of ownership within the team as they collectively contribute to shaping the ERP system.

In practice, you can create interdisciplinary teams that consist of members from different departments who work together to understand and address the unique requirements of their respective functions. This approach encourages a collaborative spirit and ensures that all voices are heard. When everyone has a say in how the ERP system will work for their department, it paves the way for stronger consensus and alignment across the organization.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

5. Identifying and Addressing Stakeholder Concerns

ERP implementations can be a source of uncertainty and apprehension for many stakeholders. It’s crucial to identify and address their concerns proactively. The hesitation to embrace change is a common issue, and it’s vital to understand these concerns. Open dialogue is the key to resolving these doubts and gaining consensus.

Stakeholder concerns can vary widely, from fears of job displacement to worries about workflow disruption. A crucial step is to engage with stakeholders directly, listen to their worries, and provide clear and honest responses. When their concerns are acknowledged and addressed, it can go a long way in building their trust and consensus in the ERP project. In addition to formal channels, informal conversations and feedback mechanisms should be established, ensuring that no issue remains unaddressed. By recognizing and dealing with these concerns, the ERP team can create a supportive environment that facilitates consensus-building.

6. Early User Involvement

End-users are the backbone of any ERP system. Their involvement should start from the project’s inception. It’s common for teams to claim that they understand the ERP system’s implications and are ready for implementation, but the actual testing reveals otherwise. To avoid such situations, engage end-users from the beginning.

Incorporating end-users in the initial stages allows them to take ownership of the project. Their hands-on insights are invaluable for tailoring the ERP system to meet their specific needs. Additionally, early involvement helps prevent surprises during testing and rollout, as issues are identified and resolved beforehand. When end-users have a say in shaping the system that will impact their daily work, they are more likely to embrace it enthusiastically.

+

Digital Transformation Change And Project Management

Learn how Big Country Raw managed the change and transformation despite their limited budget for ERP implementation and eCommerce integration.

7. Training and Skill Development

An ERP system is only as effective as the team using it. Providing comprehensive training and skill development programs is crucial for team members to navigate the system with confidence. Training should be an ongoing process, adapting to the evolving needs of the team and the ERP system itself.

Training ensures that team members are not only capable of using the ERP system but are also proficient in doing so. Proper training results in a smoother transition during system adoption and reduces the likelihood of errors or inefficiencies. Additionally, ongoing skill development keeps the team updated on new features and functionalities, maximizing the system’s potential and ensuring long-term consensus.

8. Change Management

Change is a natural part of any ERP implementation. Effective change management involves guiding teams through this transition period. The lack of change management can lead to confusion and resistance, which can hinder consensus.

A structured change management approach helps the team adapt to new processes and procedures with minimal disruption. It includes communicating the reasons for the changes, addressing concerns, and involving team members in the change process. Successful change management not only aids in building consensus but also streamlines the ERP implementation journey.

9. Recognizing And Addressing Red Flags

The ability to recognize early warning signs of resistance or misalignment within the ERP team is critical. The failure to identify and address red flags can lead to project delays and increased costs.

These red flags may include resistance to change, disputes over system functionalities, or a lack of engagement during team meetings. The key is to remain vigilant and address these issues promptly. Whether it’s by offering additional support, clarifying project goals, or revisiting training sessions, early intervention is crucial for maintaining consensus and ensuring a successful ERP implementation.

10. Building Consensus With Executives

While building consensus among team members is essential, it’s equally crucial to gain the support and alignment of executives. Some executives may not fully comprehend the operational intricacies of ERP implementations. Therefore, strategies are needed to ensure that executives are well-informed and engaged in the project.

Building consensus with executives involves providing them with a clear understanding of the project’s objectives, benefits, and potential challenges. It also entails keeping them actively involved in decision-making and ensuring that their expectations align with the project’s realities. When executives and team members share a common understanding and commitment to the ERP project, consensus is more likely to be achieved.

Conclusion


In conclusion, building consensus among ERP teams is a multifaceted process that involves clear objectives, strong leadership, transparent communication, and inclusive collaboration. Identifying and addressing stakeholder concerns, early user involvement, and comprehensive training are essential components of this journey. Effective change management and the ability to recognize red flags ensure that consensus is maintained throughout the project.

Building consensus with executives adds another layer of alignment. By implementing these strategies, ERP teams can navigate the challenges and complexities of ERP projects while achieving successful outcomes. Consensus within the team paves the way for a seamless ERP implementation and empowers organizations to leverage their systems effectively.

FAQs

Top 10 WMS Systems In 2024

Traditionally, ERP systems lacked WMS capabilities due to technological and architectural differences. However, with the advent of cloud technology, modern systems now include basic WMS features for mid-market users, eliminating concerns about complex integration or the need for a separate WMS package. Nevertheless, companies, even with simpler operations, often outgrow these basic capabilities and find the need for best-of-breed WMS software.

Once you reach this stage, the next step is to identify the most suitable best-of-breed WMS software. A crucial consideration emerges for companies with a 3PL focus, even if it constitutes a minor component of their business model. As distributors seek diversification, many explore 3PL offerings, leading to a warehouse architecture distinct from the traditional approach closely tied to inventory accounting. Moreover, the requirements for accelerated transactions and round-the-clock operations highlight the essential need for a dedicated warehouse management system.

With technological advancements, warehouse architecture has undergone significant evolution, comprising three key components: the warehouse management system (WMS), warehouse execution system (WES), and warehouse control system (WCS). The control system’s role is to transmit commands, facilitate integration with hardware, and ensure smooth coordination. The warehouse management system primarily handles data and inventory management, while the execution component unifies these functions. WMS solutions may offer some or all of these capabilities, often bundled with additional systems in their suite. Now, let’s explore the top 10 WMS systems in 2024.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Criteria

  • Overall market share/# of customers. How large is the market share of this WMS product? WMS vendors‘ overall market share is irrelevant for this list if they have multiple WMS products in their portfolio. 
  • Ownership/funding. Who owns the WMS vendor? Is it a private equity company, a family or a group of families, or a wealthy corporate investor?
  • Quality of development (legacy vs. legacy dressed as modern vs. modern UX/cloud-native). How modern is the tech stack? Not clunky! How aggressively is the WMS vendor pushing cloud-native functionality for this product? No fake clouds! Is the roadmap officially announced? Or uncertain?
  • Community/Ecosystem. How vibrant is the community? Social media groups? In-person user groups? Forums?
  • Depth of native functionality (for specific industries). Last-mile functionality for specific industries natively built into the product?
  • Quality of publicly available product documentation. How well-documented is the product? Is the documentation available publicly? How updated is the demo content available on YouTube?
  • Product share and documented commitment (of the publisher through financial statements). Is the product share reported separately in financial statements if the WMS vendor is public?
  • Acquisition strategy aligned with the product. Are there any recent acquisitions to fill a specific hole with this product? Are there any official announcements to integrate recently acquired capabilities?
  • Maturity of the Supply Chain Suite. How mature are other capabilities that would augment WMS, such as TMS, WMS, S&OP, and the network?
  • User Reviews. How specific are the reviews about this product’s capabilities? How recent and frequent are the reviews?
  • Must be a WMS product. Must be a recognized WMS product by several analyst firms with a proven track record and market share.

10. Tecsys 

Tecsys specializes in serving healthcare and retail sectors, offering unique capabilities tailored to specific verticals, particularly in point-of-use inventory management. While many WMS vendors may include hardware or have partnerships for devices and ASRS systems, Tecsys stands out with its focus on specialized hardware and interfaces crucial for point-of-use systems, which could be costly to develop on generic WMS platforms. 

These sectors also benefit from Tecsys’ robust multi-location inventory features, facilitating seamless goods transfer across various locations. Opt for Tecsys if you’re a mid-market healthcare or retail organization, especially if you have distinct needs they uniquely address.

Pros
  1. Point-of-use inventory management, with specialized hardware and interfaces, is crucial for traceability.
  2. Multi-location Capabilities are suitable for facilities with diverse locations, such as hospitals or retail businesses.
  3. eCommerce and retail-friendly with an integrated Order Management System (OMS), catering to budget-conscious mid-market Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) and e-commerce-centric companies.
Cons
  1. Outdated technology compared to some modern cloud-native options.
  2. Not a comprehensive suite like larger players such as Blue Yonder and Manhattan, lacking a full supply chain suite.
  3. Limited ecosystem and consulting options compared to other alternatives on the list.

9. Mobe3 WMS

Mobe3 WMS is among the more compact solutions featured on this list, commonly integrated into smaller ERP ecosystems. Despite its size, it boasts rich features tailored to support the specific requirements of smaller warehouses, particularly in process and batch-centric industries. 

These industries demand specialized capabilities, such as pallet and lot attributes, integrated into the solution. Opt for Mobe3 WMS if you are a small organization seeking a cost-effective and easily implementable WMS tool.

Pros
  1. iOS-friendly and cloud-native, uniquely designed for iOS interfaces, making it one of the few cloud-native WMS systems.
  2. Advanced capabilities for SMBs, including features like measuring picking metrics, surpassing expectations for its size.
  3. Advanced capabilities for process and batch manufacturing, offering support for lot attributes, bin attributes, and pallet attributes crucial for advanced slotting and cross-docking.
Cons
  1. Technology and compatibility issues with some devices require careful consideration of device compatibility.
  2. Reports of software bugs from some users, indicating potential stability concerns compared to larger vendors.
  3. Not suitable for enterprises, lacking the transaction processing capabilities required by larger organizations.

8. Logiwa WMS

Logiwa WMS is tailored for eCommerce and parcel-centric operations, excelling in various aspects of warehouse management, including WMS, WCS, and WES. While its capabilities are robust, they may not be as comprehensive as those offered by some other enterprise solutions featured on this list. Opt for Logiwa if you require a cloud-native, feature-rich WMS designed for mid-size warehouses with a focus on parcel-centric operations.

Pros
  1. Ideal for eCommerce and parcel-centric operations, making it particularly well-suited for businesses in these sectors.
  2. Feature-rich, offering advanced capabilities typically found in mid-size WMS systems, although not as advanced as some enterprise solutions.
  3. Cloud-native UI/UX, providing an intuitive interface and user experience. Encompasses capabilities across WMS, WCS, and WES, including integration with ASRS systems and AGVs.
Cons
  1. Learning curve, requiring users to adapt to the system, especially if they lack prior experience with WMS solutions.
  2. Not as user-friendly as simpler WMS systems like Mobe3, necessitating training and implementation efforts.
  3. Limited coverage for complex enterprise modes, primarily designed for parcel-centric operations, makes it less suitable for warehouses with diverse modes.

7. Softeon

Softeon caters to a customer base similar to Infor WMS, focusing on the upper mid-market segment. However, it lacks proven experience with enterprise customers compared to some other solutions on this list, and it might be too robust for smaller companies. 

Consider Softeon if you are a mid-sized organization in search of an advanced WMS that not only offers additional capabilities like distributed order management but also supports crucial batch processing required for larger warehouse operations.

Pros
  1. Robust batch capabilities, addressing the needs of mid-sized companies that have outgrown basic barcoding solutions.
  2. Seamless integration with other solutions included in the suite, streamlining the connectivity between different components like distributed order management.
  3. Distributed order management capabilities are beneficial for high-volume retail and distribution organizations managing complex transactions, including micro-fulfillment operations.
Cons
  1. Not tailored for enterprise-scale operations. lacking a proven track record with larger companies.
  2. Requires third-party add-ons for enterprises needing additional supply chain capabilities, making the suite less comprehensive than larger solutions like Blue Yonder or Manhattan.
  3. May be too intricate for very small operations, with layers supporting batch processing potentially overwhelming for companies with minimal scale.
+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

6. Infor WMS

Infor WMS is tailored for distributors in the upper mid-market segment, particularly prevalent in manufacturing industries, with a notable focus on verticals where solutions like Infor LN and M3 hold prominence. This is particularly applicable to sectors such as Automotive, Aerospace, Fashion, and Industrial distribution. If you are a mid-market manufacturer, especially considering or already utilizing Infor LN or M3 ERP systems, Infor WMS might be a suitable choice.

Pros
  1. Seamless integration with other Infor ERPs. Infor WMS offers pre-integrated solutions with Infor LN and M3, addressing the inherent challenges of ERP-WMS integration, especially for manufacturers already leveraging these ERP systems.
  2. Comprehensive supply chain capabilities. In addition to WMS, Infor WMS incorporates various supply chain offerings, including S&OP and visibility platforms, making it comparable to larger supply chain suites like Blue Yonder or Manhattan.
  3. 3D warehouse functionality. The unique 3D warehouse capability is particularly advantageous for larger warehouses, enhancing operational efficiencies through a virtual 3D layout.
Cons
  1. Limited suitability for large enterprises. While excelling in upper mid-market warehouses, Infor WMS might not be the optimal choice for high-volume warehouses with smaller dollar transactions.
  2. Weakness in TMS execution. The Transportation Management System (TMS) component is not as robust, necessitating the adoption of a best-of-breed TMS execution product to align with more robust suites like Blue Yonder.
  3. Suboptimal for 3PL. While possessing capabilities similar to SAP EWM, Infor WMS is not tailored for 3PL perspectives, lacking in-depth compliance, freight audit features, and dispatch and rate shopping functionalities typically essential for 3PL operations.

5. Oracle WMS

Oracle WMS is well-suited for expansive transactional warehouses seeking a dedicated supply chain layer to manage high transaction volumes, 24/7 operations, or the warehouse architecture of a 3PL business model. It is particularly advantageous for enterprises desiring comprehensive supply chain capabilities within a unified suite, especially if already integrated with Oracle Cloud ERP. If you are a large enterprise, particularly leveraging other Oracle products like ERP or RMS, Oracle WMS may be a suitable choice.

Pros
  1. Complete suite for a comprehensive tech stack. Oracle WMS integrates various supply chain capabilities, including RMS, S&OP, TMS, etc., offering a comparable feature set to other expansive suites like Blue Yonder and Manhattan.
  2. Pre-integration with other Oracle apps. Oracle WMS seamlessly integrates with other Oracle applications such as ERP and TMS, eliminating the need for expensive custom integration efforts, making it suitable for large enterprises.
  3. Proven for high transaction volumes. Oracle WMS has demonstrated its effectiveness in managing millions of transactions and large, busy warehouses and operations.
Cons
  1. Overwhelming for smaller companies. The data model and product design may pose challenges for smaller organizations, introducing additional steps and operational overhead.
  2. Dependency on add-ons for specific capabilities. Oracle lacks native capabilities for network, data, and maps, relying on partners to provide these features, limiting its execution capabilities.
  3. Expensive customization for compliance workflows. Implementing compliance workflows not pre-built into the core requires substantial development and consulting efforts, contributing to higher customization costs compared to other solutions.
+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

4. SAP EWM

SAP EWM caters to enterprise-grade warehouses and distribution companies, especially those with a 3PL business model, particularly when integrated with other SAP solutions like SAP S/4 HANA. However, it may not be the best fit for smaller warehouses operating on a limited consulting budget. Opt for SAP EWM if you are a large distribution company with a global presence, particularly leveraging other SAP products such as SAP S/4 HANA or SAP Hybris.

Pros
  1. Support for both decoupled and embedded architecture. This flexibility enables companies to facilitate 24/7 warehouse operations and accommodate the unique warehouse architecture demands of a 3PL business model, distinct from the financial representation in the ERP system.
  2. Power of HANA. Leveraging the robust capabilities of HANA, SAP EWM can efficiently handle the demanding workloads of Fortune 500 organizations, providing a competitive edge compared to solutions that might struggle with such volumes.
  3. Advanced capabilities for 3PL. SAP EWM offers features tailored for 3PL operations, including support for value-added services integral to the 3PL business model, and enhancing capabilities for billing and service offerings.
Cons
  1. Too big for smaller companies. The complex data model of SAP EWM may pose challenges for smaller organizations seeking streamlined systems without the overhead crucial for larger enterprises.
  2. Learning curve and expensive implementation. Implementing SAP EWM involves a significant learning curve and substantial implementation costs due to the system’s complexity.
  3. Expensive. In comparison to other solutions on this list, SAP EWM’s pricing may not be as accommodating for smaller organizations.

3. Korber/HighJump 

Korber/HighJump serves mid- to upper-mid-sized companies seeking an integrated suite, including last-mile capabilities. Although Korber/HighJump features various integrated components like TMS, DSD, and freight audit capabilities, it may not offer the same level of comprehensiveness as some other solutions on this list. Opt for Korber if you have graduated from standalone, smaller WMS systems and require a suite with advanced WMS capabilities tailored for mid-market companies.

Pros
  1. Fairly comprehensive suite for both WMS and TMS. Korber’s suite encompasses several pre-integrated components, providing advantages not found in smaller solutions like mobe3.
  2. Pre-integrated WMS and TMS. The pre-integrated WMS and TMS offered by Korber are particularly beneficial for mid-market companies, eliminating the need for extensive integration efforts required by standalone WMS and TMS systems.
  3. DSD capabilities. Korber addresses the needs of companies in the DSD space, offering specialized capabilities such as proof of delivery, in-house fleet management, and unique dispatch and scheduling features based on routing or priority.
Cons
  1. Issues with pre-baked integration. While Korber provides pre-baked integration, thorough vetting of integration flows based on specific requirements may be necessary. Custom integration might be required if existing flows prove insufficient for particular use cases.
  2. Not a complete Supply Chain suite. Compared to other suites on this list, Korber may lack some comprehensive capabilities, such as integrated S&OP and control tower features that are more expansive in other solutions.
  3. Not for enterprises. Unlike proven solutions such as Blue Yonder and Manhattan, Korber may not have as extensive experience with large accounts.

2. Blue Yonder

Blue Yonder boasts the strongest supply chain suite, coupled with advanced WMS capabilities, well-established in enterprises, particularly within high-volume retail companies. However, Blue Yonder may not be suitable for smaller businesses. Opt for Blue Yonder if you are a large enterprise, especially in the retail sector, seeking a comprehensive supply chain suite seamlessly integrated with a WMS.

Pros
  1. Enterprise-grade WMS with pre-built components. Blue Yonder stands out as a leading supply chain suite, validated through successful collaborations with Fortune 500 accounts.
  2. Ideal for retail-centric industries. Offering advanced capabilities tailored for retailers managing extensive SKU portfolios and multiple locations, Blue Yonder excels in location-level planning.
  3. Pre-integrated support for all supply chain modes. Blue Yonder provides comprehensive assistance across all supply chain modes, inclusive of a supply chain control tower with advanced AI and ML capabilities, enhancing the existing WMS features.
Cons
  1. Too large for SMBs. Blue Yonder’s extensive capabilities may be overwhelming for small and medium-sized businesses seeking simpler WMS solutions.
  2. Cost-prohibitive for SMBs. The expense associated with Blue Yonder may be deemed excessive by SMBs without enterprise-scale requirements.
  3. Lack of a network component in the supply chain suite. A notable drawback is Blue Yonder’s absence of an owned network. Solutions with an integrated network possess enhanced data control, enabling richer insights to augment WMS capabilities.

1. Manhattan Associates

Manhattan WMS stands as one of the most robust solutions in the market, particularly excelling in high-volume retail scenarios. While Manhattan may not offer the same comprehensiveness in its Supply Chain suite, it is exceptionally well-suited for large enterprises in the food, grocery, shoe, and apparel industries. However, it may not be the optimal choice for smaller businesses. Opt for Manhattan if you are a sizable company, particularly in the food, grocery, shoe, and apparel sectors, seeking a top-tier WMS solution.

Pros
  1. The suite includes a pre-integrated point of sale. Manhattan’s suite incorporates a pre-integrated point of sale, offering significant advantages for companies lacking internal IT capabilities for integration or unwilling to invest in costly integration processes.
  2. Capable of handling enterprise workloads. Proven with enterprise retailers dealing with extensive transaction volumes and SKU portfolios, Manhattan demonstrates proficiency in deep planning and merchandising capabilities.
  3. Effective management of complex verticals. Manhattan excels in handling unique requirements associated with inventory planning in verticals like grocery, shoes, and apparel, showcasing specialized WMS capabilities.
Cons
  1. Incomplete supply chain suite. Although Manhattan’s suite covers essential execution components such as WMS, TMS, OMS, and POS, it falls short in other supply chain pillars such as S&OP and network.
  2. Requires add-ons for comprehensive supply chain capabilities. Companies seeking a holistic suite experience may need multiple add-ons to match the capabilities of other Supply Chain suites like Blue Yonder.
  3. Not designed for SMBs. Tailored for enterprise companies, Manhattan’s design may not be as accommodating for smaller businesses seeking simpler solutions.

Conclusion

Selecting a WMS system can be challenging, given its intersection with various software categories and evolving packaging strategies. As technology progresses, the distinctions are becoming less clear, adding to the complexity.

For those seeking a new WMS system, a crucial step is understanding your business model and transactions and aligning them with suitable software with the help of independent WMS consultants. This list aims to offer a concise starting point for further evaluation.

FAQs

Top 5 Types of ERP Contracts

Top 5 Types of ERP Contracts

ERP contracts are not as straightforward. Depending upon the engagement structure (and different parties involved), the arrangements could vary, with serious implications on the outcome. These agreements include various elements, such as relationships and obligations of different parties involved, including licensing, pricing, implementation, support, and maintenance. They set the tone for your ERP initiatives.



The 2025 Digital Transformation Report

Thinking of embarking on a ERP journey and looking for a digital transformation report? Want to learn the best practices of digital transformation? Then, you have come to the right place.

Misunderstandings start with the misalignment in expectations. Even if different parties claim to be aligned, they might still arise because of the language used. The same keyword could mean different things in different contexts. For example, customers might expect ERP vendors to do the heavy lifting. However, vendors might expect their role to be just advisory due to the limited budget. Even if contracts might include detailed RACI charts, there might still be layers that might cause confusion and disagreements.

Moreover, customers struggle with ERP contracts due to their myopic focus on hourly rates, pricing, and discounts, and because of this, they lose sight of details. The problems with contracts are very similar to any complex project, especially with scheduling. Because customers underestimate the complexity and expertise required to read between the lines. This article will explore the top five types of ERP contracts, discussing their nuances, benefits, and potential drawbacks.



ERP Selection: The Ultimate Guide

This is an in-depth guide with over 80 pages and covers every topic as it pertains to ERP selection in sufficient detail to help you make an informed decision.

1. Software License, Implementation,  and Support on OEM Papers

In this ERP contract arrangement, you enter into multiple contracts directly with the software OEMs. In the ERP industry, the OEM would be software publishers such as SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft. The software OEMs would not only provide the software and product support, but they would also use their professional services to help with implementation. These contracts are usually segregated into software, service, and support agreements, each serving a distinct purpose and carrying different legal obligations.

The software agreement encompasses an End User Licensing Agreement (EULA), which defines the terms and conditions for utilizing the ERP software and the accompanying IP rights. On the other hand, the services agreement focuses on the services related to implementing the ERP software. This typically includes information about the skills required, the methodology for implementing the software, project timelines, and the roles and responsibilities of both parties involved.

The support agreement specifies the support services provided for the ERP system. It often categorizes support into different tiers based on the severity of issues, sets timelines for issue resolution, and may define billing rates for additional services not covered by the initial support agreement. This agreement may also contain provisions related to warranties.

Key points to remember: OEMs are generally cautious in their consulting and support recommendations. The caution arises because any help or recommendations they provide in areas not explicitly defined in the contract may affect their obligations under the software agreement. By assuming too much risk in these areas, the software company may potentially jeopardize its software contract so they may be conservative in their approach.

2. Software Licenses on OEM Papers; Engagement with a Reseller

In this arrangement, the software contract is still with an OEM, but your primary engagement will likely be with a reseller. These resellers typically have access to the OEM’s quoting software and can provide a quote on official OEM documents.

In this arrangement, the OEM works in the background. They may not actively engage with the customer unless specific issues arise that may require their involvement, particularly if the customer’s relationship with the reseller becomes problematic. In such cases, the OEMs generally take over the reseller and might suggest switching to another reseller. In this arrangement, there are potential issues to consider:

  • Discounts and Costs: The discounts and costs associated with the ERP software may change based on new resellers’ tier status. 
  • Reseller Commissions: Switching to a different reseller might affect the commission structure, potentially leading to a loss of existing discounts or benefits.
  • Support Costs: If the company decides to switch back to the OEM for support, this may be more expensive than receiving support from the reseller.

Key points to remember: The support for the ERP software in this arrangement can vary. Sometimes, the software OEM may still provide support directly, or the reseller might handle the first level of support. The reseller will collaborate with the OEM if more advanced support is required. Implementation contracts with resellers are usually easier to switch unless the reseller has used proprietary intellectual property (IP) in the implementation. In such cases, changing resellers can be more challenging, as the new reseller or the OEM may not possess the specific industry-specific IP needed for the system to be useful for the customer.

3. Software Licenses on Reseller’s Papers 

In this arrangement, the software vendor (OEM) transfers the legal responsibility for the software to the reseller. This means that the reseller becomes primarily accountable for the software sales, support, and any legal issues that may arise. The relationship between the OEM and the reseller remains transactional, meaning the OEM would still transact with the reseller for each transaction rather than buying in bulk. The reseller earns a commission for each sale it makes. 

However, the OEM does not control (at least not directly) the final selling price the reseller offers to customers. The OEM provides the software to resellers at a wholesale price. This wholesale price is typically lower than what end customers pay. In this arrangement, the reseller can determine the final selling price to customers. 

Key points to remember: The legal responsibility for the software product is entirely shifted to the reseller. In other words, if any legal issues or disputes arise related to the software, the reseller is held accountable. The reseller is also responsible for providing customer support for the software. Customers may contact the reseller for assistance, and the reseller is expected to resolve any issues. Additionally, the reseller may be able to customize the software to meet industry-specific needs.  It’s common for resellers in this arrangement, especially those dealing with horizontal software platforms such as SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, or Microsoft, to have their own Intellectual Property (IP) that enhances the core software. This IP may provide industry-specific functionalities that cater to the unique needs of specific business sectors or verticals.

+

ERP Implementation Failure Recovery

Learn how Frederick Wildman struggled with Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP implementation failure even after spending over $5M and what options they had for recovery.

4. Software Licenses Sold in an OEM Relationship by Software OEMs

This is a special arrangement with resellers and might be reserved only for certain territories/geographies or for very large resellers. In this arrangement, the resellers acquire licenses from their software publishers (or software OEMs) in an OEM arrangement. This agreement might be based on a volume purchase, which means the reseller commits to buying a large number of software licenses. 

In this scenario, the reseller could substantially change the software’s code, including selling under a completely new brand in a white-label arrangement. This can include customizing the software to meet specific needs, adding new features, or altering the software’s appearance. 

Key points to remember: In this situation, the reseller OEM primarily acts as the software platform provider. They focus on creating and maintaining the core software product. You might have limited or no direct interaction with the software OEM as a customer. Instead, your dealings would be mainly with the reseller OEM. Since you’re primarily dealing with the reseller OEM, you may not have access to the software OEM’s support and resources. If you encounter issues or need assistance, you typically contact the reseller OEM. If the reseller chooses to white-label the software, they may establish support and implementation services. This means they’ll provide customer support and help with the software’s deployment independently of the software OEM. They might have their dedicated support team and resources to assist you.

5. Software Licenses Sold in a Master Distributor Relationship

In this arrangement, the software OEMs may have several layers of master distributors with their respective channels to distribute the licenses. This arrangement is similar to the reseller OEM relationship in #4, where the software OEM will likely be least involved with the licensing and support. And for the most part, you are likely to deal with a master distributor

Key points to remember: This arrangement is especially common with companies selling hardware, but software vendors like Microsoft will likely have similar relationships even for their ERP channel. Due to the nesting of relationships and contractual dependencies, this is perhaps the most convoluted arrangement where understanding the roles and responsibilities of each party might be harder, even for ERP experts.

+

ECommerce Supply Chain Transformation

Learn how LockNLube transformed its inventory and supply chain challenges by consolidating over 20 systems.

Conclusion

Understanding the legal obligations of each party involved is essential for the project’s success. Otherwise, get ready to face the financial and legal surprises. These relationships and arrangements can challenge even the professionals tracking the space daily. So, don’t underestimate the expertise required to understand these contracts. Hire the advisors at least for negotiation before creating a million-dollar disaster by not fully understanding what you are signing up for.



ERP Selection Requirements Template

This resource provides the template that you need to capture the requirements of different functional areas, processes, and teams.

FAQs

FREE RESOURCE

2025 Digital Transformation Report

This digital transformation report summarizes our annual research on ERP and digital transformation trends and forecasts for the year 2025. 

Send this to a friend